<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Re: WPA cracking, are you scared yet?&#x27; in forum &#x27;Wireless Security&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-WPA-cracking-are-you-scared-yet-22526526</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:03:27 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:03:27 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: WPA cracking, are you scared yet?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-WPA-cracking-are-you-scared-yet-22790844</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1143582" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1143582');">Thane_Bitter</a>:</small><br><br><div class="bquote">"The SSID and the SSID length is seeded into the passphrase hash. This means that the passphrase of 'password' will be hashed differently on a network with the SSID of 'linksys' than it will on a network with the SSID of 'default'." <br></div><small>&raquo;<A HREF="http://hak5.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=12708&st=0&p=128919entry128919" >hak5.org/forums/index.php?showto&middot;&middot;&middot;ry128919</A></small><br><br>If you use a standard SSID like "default", "linksys", or any of the other ones they included in the table it allows a hacker to more efficiently crack a WAP that is using a weak password.  Assuming you do use a SSID on the list but have a 63 digit random string (numbers, uppercase & lower case letters, punctuation and the rest of the keys usable on a keyboard) the would still have to crack your WAP via brute force because the rainbow lists would not have the processed shortcuts for your wireless key.<br><br>By using a unique SSID the rainbow list would have to be recomputed for that SSID, even then it would only allow the hacker to crack your password if the key was in the dictionary that was used to make the list.  <br><br>In short, the rainbow lists works as an efficient universal tool to crack poorly secured wireless networks with greater speed.<br> </div>thanks learned something.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-WPA-cracking-are-you-scared-yet-22790844</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 17:30:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: WPA cracking, are you scared yet?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-WPA-cracking-are-you-scared-yet-22756865</link>
<description><![CDATA[DataRiker posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1143582" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1143582');">Thane_Bitter</a>:</small><br><br>In short, the rainbow lists works as an efficient universal tool to crack poorly secured wireless networks with greater speed.<br> </div>I would take it even further. Consider the following password:<br><br>ddg7<br><br>We would both agree this is a weak password. But using precomputed hash table will surely fail because they can not possible contain significant amount of permutations as the space required to store the table would be astronomically large.<br><br>For a dictionary attack yes, but most passwords I have encountered in the wild ( all actually ) would not be found in a dictionary - such as most last names - a first initial and a last name - a name with a number - random spacing and caps.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-WPA-cracking-are-you-scared-yet-22756865</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 20:43:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: WPA cracking, are you scared yet?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-WPA-cracking-are-you-scared-yet-22756770</link>
<description><![CDATA[DataRiker posted : Very well put. Technically they are not "rainbow" tables, but rather precomputed hash tables.<br><br>These precomputed tables are somewhat of a useless sensation, since many users like to use passwords that include their last name or their last name plus a number.<br><br>For example, the biggest freely available PCT for SSID linksys will fail if i just used my last name for a password (like many people do - or even worse my last name plus a number)<br><br>PCT's will fail 99.99%. <br><br>Why don't they include numbers you ask? or even simple permutations - do you have 1 trillion GB's to spare?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-WPA-cracking-are-you-scared-yet-22756770</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 20:29:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: WPA cracking, are you scared yet?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-WPA-cracking-are-you-scared-yet-22720224</link>
<description><![CDATA[Thane_Bitter posted : <div class="bquote">"The SSID and the SSID length is seeded into the passphrase hash. This means that the passphrase of 'password' will be hashed differently on a network with the SSID of 'linksys' than it will on a network with the SSID of 'default'." <br></div><small>&raquo;<A HREF="http://hak5.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=12708&st=0&p=128919entry128919" >hak5.org/forums/index.php?showto&middot;&middot;&middot;ry128919</A></small><br><br>If you use a standard SSID like "default", "linksys", or any of the other ones they included in the table it allows a hacker to more efficiently crack a WAP that is using a weak password.  Assuming you do use a SSID on the list but have a 63 digit random string (numbers, uppercase & lower case letters, punctuation and the rest of the keys usable on a keyboard) the would still have to crack your WAP via brute force because the rainbow lists would not have the processed shortcuts for your wireless key.<br><br>By using a unique SSID the rainbow list would have to be recomputed for that SSID, even then it would only allow the hacker to crack your password if the key was in the dictionary that was used to make the list.  <br><br>In short, the rainbow lists works as an efficient universal tool to crack poorly secured wireless networks with greater speed.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-WPA-cracking-are-you-scared-yet-22720224</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 20:10:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: WPA cracking, are you scared yet?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-WPA-cracking-are-you-scared-yet-22716159</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : How does knowing my SSID make a password easier to guess, hack? My password is random gibberish also with the special symbols used.<br><br>Sure if you use a password that goes along with the SSID theme but a random password?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-WPA-cracking-are-you-scared-yet-22716159</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 03:58:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: WPA cracking, are you scared yet?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-WPA-cracking-are-you-scared-yet-22667078</link>
<description><![CDATA[Anav posted : What scares me is that, although these irresponsible and fearmongering types of post will have no effect on most of us, they may send more sensitive types into a tizzy quite needlessly.   Case in point, see pg1. :-)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-WPA-cracking-are-you-scared-yet-22667078</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 12:12:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: WPA cracking, are you scared yet?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-WPA-cracking-are-you-scared-yet-22665266</link>
<description><![CDATA[Nerdtalker posted : I'm still nowhere near concerned. Sure, WPA and WPA2 aren't invincible, but the level of protection they offer compared to the other options (WEP or nothing) is huge.<br><br>Anyone who really cares about what they're doing and sensitive data just uses a VPN. If you really care that much, you'd be doing so.<br><br>I use a 20 character PSK with upper and lower case letters, as well as numbers and symbols. Am I concerned in the least? Uh, no.<br><small>--<br>"Some people never see the light till it shines thru bullet holes." -Bruce Cockburn<br><br>I'm testing Gmail's spam filters: Broadbandreports1@gmail.com<br><b>Spam: 12900+</b> messages currently using 406 MB.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-WPA-cracking-are-you-scared-yet-22665266</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 01:46:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: WPA cracking, are you scared yet?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-WPA-cracking-are-you-scared-yet-22564799</link>
<description><![CDATA[JohnInSJ posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1245628" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1245628');">fonzbear2000</a>:</small><br><br>And if they do anything illegal using your connection and take off, you would be held responsible.<br> </div>I take it you're not a lawyer.<br><br>If you're that worried about it, I suggest you unhook your wifi AP, dig a hole in your back yard, and bury it there.<br><small>--<br>My place : &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.schettino.us" >www.schettino.us</A></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-WPA-cracking-are-you-scared-yet-22564799</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 09:23:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: WPA cracking, are you scared yet?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-WPA-cracking-are-you-scared-yet-22562598</link>
<description><![CDATA[fonzbear2000 posted : What if it's someone who is in a car with a laptop and they do it and then leave your area. How would they be found? And if they do anything illegal using your connection and take off, you would be held responsible.<br><small>--<br>&raquo;<A HREF="/forum/r22511483-Check-this-out!">Check this out!</A></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-WPA-cracking-are-you-scared-yet-22562598</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 20:10:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: WPA cracking, are you scared yet?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-WPA-cracking-are-you-scared-yet-22562522</link>
<description><![CDATA[JohnInSJ posted : They they get arrested, since the broke the law (by hacking my network) to gain access.<br><br>If I am running an open network then I might be responsible. If someone splices into my cable or hacks my wifi, I don't think I am.<br><br>Do you think you are? Really?<br><small>--<br>My place : &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.schettino.us" >www.schettino.us</A></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-WPA-cracking-are-you-scared-yet-22562522</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 19:55:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: WPA cracking, are you scared yet?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-WPA-cracking-are-you-scared-yet-22562159</link>
<description><![CDATA[fonzbear2000 posted : For those of you saying things like: "so what if someone hacks my network? Let them" and so on, what if someone hacks your network and starts downloading child porn?<br><small>--<br>&raquo;<A HREF="/forum/r22511483-Check-this-out!">Check this out!</A></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-WPA-cracking-are-you-scared-yet-22562159</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 18:48:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: WPA cracking, are you scared yet?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-WPA-cracking-are-you-scared-yet-22556352</link>
<description><![CDATA[Its a Secret posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1304122" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1304122');">Tonice2007</a>:</small><br><br>My question to you is what technology isn't hackable?  </div> Depends on how many decades you have to crack it.  ;)<br><br>If you can crack a 63 ASCII PW in a reasonable amount of time (days, not millinea), people will pay you a lot. Again, feel free to try.<br><small>--<br>"In the future, that which is not mandatory will be illegal"<br>"Nobody knows the age of the human race, but everybody agrees that it is old enough to know better" - Anonymous</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-WPA-cracking-are-you-scared-yet-22556352</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 19:53:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: WPA cracking, are you scared yet?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-WPA-cracking-are-you-scared-yet-22556246</link>
<description><![CDATA[munky99999 posted :  <blockquote><small>quote:</small><hr>My question to you is what technology isn't hackable? The answer is nothing<hr></blockquote><br>wpa2(aes) with a radius server. Cant see that being busted atm.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-WPA-cracking-are-you-scared-yet-22556246</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 19:37:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: WPA cracking, are you scared yet?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-WPA-cracking-are-you-scared-yet-22551993</link>
<description><![CDATA[Tonice2007 posted : My question to you is what technology isn't hackable? The answer is nothing, elsewise, there wouldn't be new technology such as WPA then WPA2 and before that WEP; it all depends on how many people use the technology and how "secure" the technology is.<br><br>Why does Microsoft products have more holes then other manufactures? It's because, it's a bigger target to hackers since the number of users of the software is more then other versions/manufactures, for an instance is a MAC computer more secure then a Windows? Not really, but Windows have more "holes" because more people hack it since Windows holds a bigger market share.<br><br>So, in the end what can you do about this security breach with WPA? Use all the characters available to you and don't only use letters, use everything you can and change your "password" every 3 months or so, so that if someone comprises your connection you can respond quickly if needed.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-WPA-cracking-are-you-scared-yet-22551993</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 23:48:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: WPA cracking, are you scared yet?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-WPA-cracking-are-you-scared-yet-22549948</link>
<description><![CDATA[tipstir posted : Those who are really into this crap, why bother talking about this. Most of us only worried about having a stable wireless in the dwelling then to worry about someone trying to get into the wireless. AES-EAP next gen though more expensive.. Time to mow the lawn..]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-WPA-cracking-are-you-scared-yet-22549948</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 15:58:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: WPA cracking, are you scared yet?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-WPA-cracking-are-you-scared-yet-22539064</link>
<description><![CDATA[Anav posted : Can we close this non-thread yet??  My cup of java is almost empty. ;-)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-WPA-cracking-are-you-scared-yet-22539064</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 08:55:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: WPA cracking, are you scared yet?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-WPA-cracking-are-you-scared-yet-22538490</link>
<description><![CDATA[Its a Secret posted : C'mon over to BC. I make a mean dark roast!  :D]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-WPA-cracking-are-you-scared-yet-22538490</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 02:56:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: WPA cracking, are you scared yet?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-WPA-cracking-are-you-scared-yet-22538462</link>
<description><![CDATA[antdude posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1531837" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1531837');">Its a Secret</a>:</small><br><br>*yawn*<br><br>Please feel free to try to hack my AP. I'll even bring you coffee. Lots of it...<br> </div>Where so we can get free coffee? :)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-WPA-cracking-are-you-scared-yet-22538462</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 02:37:13 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: WPA cracking, are you scared yet?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-WPA-cracking-are-you-scared-yet-22538225</link>
<description><![CDATA[Its a Secret posted : *yawn*<br><br>Please feel free to try to hack my AP. I'll even bring you coffee. Lots of it...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-WPA-cracking-are-you-scared-yet-22538225</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 00:51:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: WPA cracking, are you scared yet?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-WPA-cracking-are-you-scared-yet-22536537</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted :  <blockquote><small>quote:</small><hr>so therefore without forehand knowledge of the ssid,<hr></blockquote>You mean like not receiving the signal from the AP?  If you are able to receive the signal from the AP you are able to see the SSID in cleartext.  So how do you have no forehand knowledge of the SSID?  Could you explain this, please?  I think F430 and other are correct - use a unique SSID and don't bother trying to hide it since you are only fooling yourself.<br><br>BTW - brute force attacks are nothing new - they are far older then electronic communication.  The weaker your passphrase the more likely the attack will succeed. If you use a good passphrase  knowing the SSID is not going to have a measurable effect on the success/failure of the attack.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-WPA-cracking-are-you-scared-yet-22536537</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 18:55:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: WPA cracking, are you scared yet?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-WPA-cracking-are-you-scared-yet-22535144</link>
<description><![CDATA[Reimer posted : This is actually nothing new<br><br>the SSID doesn't need to be hidden. It just needs to be unique. And even if your SSID is in the tables, if the passphrase is strong enough then the tables won't have an impact regardless.<br><br>so bottom line.. strong passphrase is still the key and having a unique SSID helps]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-WPA-cracking-are-you-scared-yet-22535144</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 15:14:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: WPA cracking, are you scared yet?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-WPA-cracking-are-you-scared-yet-22535142</link>
<description><![CDATA[csiemers posted : Hmmm.. worried, heck no.<br>Lets see, someone breaks in and sees my CD collection on my NAS drive, oooh aaaah. . . I have more important thinks to worry about than what the script kiddies are doing.<br><small>--<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.wwiivehicles.com" >www.wwiivehicles.com</A><br><br>World War II Vehicles and Advanced Squad Leader</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-WPA-cracking-are-you-scared-yet-22535142</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 15:14:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: WPA cracking, are you scared yet?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-WPA-cracking-are-you-scared-yet-22534934</link>
<description><![CDATA[JohnInSJ posted : So l33t haxxor is sitting at the curb with his 27 node cluster, and me having my ssid hidden is going to protect me? Seriously?<br><br>Yeah, I'm not scared yet.<br><small>--<br>My place : &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.schettino.us" >www.schettino.us</A></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-WPA-cracking-are-you-scared-yet-22534934</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 14:41:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: WPA cracking, are you scared yet?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-WPA-cracking-are-you-scared-yet-22531542</link>
<description><![CDATA[CraftyPirate posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by F430 :</small><br><br>  <blockquote><small>quote:</small><hr>...you would know how pointless it is to reduce the number of times your SSID is transmitted (you cannot "hide" it).<hr></blockquote></div>Perhaps I should have reworded it so that it is not being "broadcasted." Limiting the number of times the ssid it is visible in plain-text can reduce the likelihood that it is exposed to being attacked. Both the ssid and passphrase are hashed in the encryption process so therefore without forehand knowledge of the ssid, the attacker is at least somewhat mitigated in his efforts but the mitigation nonetheless does have impact.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-WPA-cracking-are-you-scared-yet-22531542</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 23:14:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: WPA cracking, are you scared yet?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-WPA-cracking-are-you-scared-yet-22530835</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted :  <blockquote><small>quote:</small><hr>This is for AES WPA-PSK standard, just another reason why you should hide your *non-standard* ssid<hr></blockquote>I was with you until you wrote this.  Obviously you have limited knowledge of how wireless works.  Otherwise you would know how pointless it is to reduce the number of times your SSID is transmitted (you cannot "hide" it).  This kind of FUD destroys any useful message you may have tried to get across.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-WPA-cracking-are-you-scared-yet-22530835</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 21:02:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: WPA cracking, are you scared yet?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-WPA-cracking-are-you-scared-yet-22528291</link>
<description><![CDATA[Thane_Bitter posted : I don't see how hiding the SSID will make a difference, however I do wholeheartedly agree that people should use a unique SSID, and certainly a full random key (using alphanumeric / symbols).  <br><br>Short of using a 'one time pad', all encryption is breakable, it is only a function of processing power and time.  Personal I am not disturbed, it is only the logical extension of other hacking/cracking schemes and these guys have taken the time to speed up the process by compiling a convenient list of shortcuts. ;)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-WPA-cracking-are-you-scared-yet-22528291</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 13:55:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>WPA cracking, are you scared yet?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/WPA-cracking-are-you-scared-yet-22526526</link>
<description><![CDATA[CraftyPirate posted : Ok I just saw the <A HREF="http://revision3.com/hak5/hoboken">latest episode of hak5</a> and was quite disturbed. (Not at the three discussing random topics while taking shots at a NYC bar, but new developments on cracking tools like cowPATTY.)<br><br>Basically, some kids went out of their way and used a 27-node cluster to make a 40 gig rainbow table that effectively cracks the top 1000 ssid's (from wigle.net, covering 52% of all recorded ssids) and 1+ million passwords associated with them.<br><br>Scary part is, an attacker need <b>NOT</b> have all 40 gig's worth of tables, he just needs your ssid and <A HREF="http://hak5.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=12708&st=0&p=128919entry128919">BOOM</a> - he dl's a 40MB file and starts cracking it within seconds.<br><br>This is for AES WPA-PSK standard, just another reason why you should hide your *non-standard* ssid, use ALL 63 *NON-STANDARD* CHARACTERS FOR THE PASSPHRASE. Or you could just set up a Radius and breathe easily before computing power is able to catch up with bruteforcing even more ssid's. :p<br><br>One thing to add though, this is assuming the attacker gets at least the 2nd frame of the 4-way wpa authentication handshake. This needs to be a physical promiscuously capture or else honey-potted with silly Windows remember wifi location "feature."]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/WPA-cracking-are-you-scared-yet-22526526</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 08:48:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

