<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Re: The $300 &#x22;Ultra&#x22; entrance fee&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-300-Ultra-entrance-fee-22539448</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 08:13:21 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 08:13:21 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: The $300 &#x22;Ultra&#x22; entrance fee</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-300-Ultra-entrance-fee-22541960</link>
<description><![CDATA[Shamayim posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1640595" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1640595');">bn1221</a>:</small><br><br>The deployment, which combined with DOCSIS 3.0 upgrades cost $300 million . . .<br><br>Could that explain how CV really arrived at its controversial $300 figure: charge each customer buying Ultra (DOCSIS 3.0) exactly one <strike>ten-thousandth</strike> millionth of the total deployment cost?<br><br>+++++++++<br>I think you mean one *millionth*.   300 million for 1 million users equates to that 300 per user.<br> </div> :uhh:<br>Fixed it for me.<br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://www.whoisjesus.org">Who is Jesus? and Why it matters (to YOU).</a><br></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-300-Ultra-entrance-fee-22541960</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 16:51:13 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: The $300 &#x22;Ultra&#x22; entrance fee</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-300-Ultra-entrance-fee-22541385</link>
<description><![CDATA[NYR 56 posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/692752" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=692752');">Shamayim</a>:</small><br><br><i>The deployment, which combined with <b>DOCSIS 3.0</b> upgrades cost <b>$300</b> million . . .</i><br><br>Could that explain how CV really arrived at its <A HREF="http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/Cablevision-101Mbps-300-Activiation-Fee-102380">controversial</a> $300 figure: charge each customer buying Ultra (DOCSIS 3.0) exactly <i>one ten-thousandth</i> of the total deployment cost?<br> </div>Do you mean one millionth?  Not sure how this is relevant to this news article either (or why people were up in arms about the $300 price to begin with).]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-300-Ultra-entrance-fee-22541385</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 15:17:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: The $300 &#x22;Ultra&#x22; entrance fee</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-300-Ultra-entrance-fee-22540343</link>
<description><![CDATA[iansltx posted : They're not obligated to do anything except compete and amke a profit :p<br><br>Though reinvesting in infrastructure is a very good thing.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-300-Ultra-entrance-fee-22540343</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 12:29:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: The $300 &#x22;Ultra&#x22; entrance fee</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-300-Ultra-entrance-fee-22540040</link>
<description><![CDATA[bn1221 posted : The deployment, which combined with DOCSIS 3.0 upgrades cost $300 million . . .<br><br>Could that explain how CV really arrived at its controversial $300 figure: charge each customer buying Ultra (DOCSIS 3.0) exactly one ten-thousandth of the total deployment cost?<br><br>+++++++++<br>I think you mean one *millionth*.   300 million for 1 million users equates to that 300 per user.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-300-Ultra-entrance-fee-22540040</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 11:39:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: The $300 &#x22;Ultra&#x22; entrance fee</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-300-Ultra-entrance-fee-22539664</link>
<description><![CDATA[sonicmerlin posted : Seeing as how Cablevision already makes a hefty profit off of their current business model, I think they're obligated to reinvest at least some of those profits into their network.  Their activation fees are rather unfair to the consumer, but also likely a deterrent to prevent abrupt mass migration of power users to their highest tier.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-The-300-Ultra-entrance-fee-22539664</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 10:43:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>The $300 &#x22;Ultra&#x22; entrance fee</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/The-300-Ultra-entrance-fee-22539448</link>
<description><![CDATA[Shamayim posted : <i>The deployment, which combined with <b>DOCSIS 3.0</b> upgrades cost <b>$300</b> million . . .</i><br><br>Could that explain how CV really arrived at its <A HREF="http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/Cablevision-101Mbps-300-Activiation-Fee-102380">controversial</a> $300 figure: charge each customer buying Ultra (DOCSIS 3.0) exactly <i>one ten-thousandth</i> of the total deployment cost?<br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://www.whoisjesus.org">Who is Jesus? and Why it matters (to YOU).</a><br></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/The-300-Ultra-entrance-fee-22539448</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 10:11:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

