republican-creole
Search:  

 
theme to white backgroundlet page decide theme
HomeFind ServiceReviewsISP NewsFAQsForumsToolsDatabaseAbout 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Tech and Talk » Technical » Digital Imaging Technology » [Lens] f/2.8 wide to normal zoom for Nikon
Search Topic:
 Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Posting:
Post a:
Post a:
Links: ·The Gallery ·Vote! Vote! Vote! ·Forum Guidelines ·DIFAQ ·Reviews ·Permanent Greeting ·User Equp
Continuous vs Flash Lighting and Everything in Between Part1 »
« New York AG after Brooklyn Scammers  
AuthorAll Replies


Kringle
Dr.D
Premium
join:2004-02-27
Pierrefonds, QC
·Bell Sympatico

reply to bfreas
Re: [Lens] f/2.8 wide to normal zoom for Nikon

I found that the 24mm wide end was pretty good in all kinds of museum situations. The aquariums, however, might be a different story.

My suggestion was based on the stated need for macro and general purpose indoor shooting. For what I do, 50 would be too short a tele end and I'd be stuck supplementing with another lens. What's the distortion like at 17mm?
to forum · permalink · · 2009-06-13 00:34:54 · Reply to this


bfreas
Premium
join:2001-06-16
Franklin, KY
·Comcast
said by Kringle See Profile :

What's the distortion like at 17mm?
Photozone's tests show that it has about average distortions for a lens in that focal length range. Pronounced barrel distortions at 17 and moderate pincusion at 50. Here's the review:

»www.photozone.de/nikon--nikkor-a···--review
--
My Gallery Site
Sunny 16 Camera Club
to forum · permalink · · 2009-06-13 11:34:13 · Reply to this


Kringle
Dr.D
Premium
join:2004-02-27
Pierrefonds, QC
·Bell Sympatico

2 edits		 Thanks for that link! Looks like a very decent lens. From what I can see, the main differences are:

17-50
More plastic in construction (upside = a bit lighter to carry)
7 blade iris
Close focus = 1:4.5

24-70
Construction comparable to Canon "L" pro glass
9 blade iris
Close focus = 1:3.8 (better for macro)
Less Chromatic aberration than the 17-50

The differing number of iris blades will change the look of the diffraction sparkles in night shots ( »dptnt.com/2007/12/what-causes-th···-photos/ ) and, subjectively, the bokeh isn't quite as smooth with the 17-50.

Both lenses seem like very good choices and the final conclusion will obviously boil down to the intended applications versus total cost.
to forum · permalink · · 2009-06-13 12:06:11 · Reply to this
-
Forums » Tech and Talk » Technical » Digital Imaging TechnologyContinuous vs Flash Lighting and Everything in Between Part1 »
« New York AG after Brooklyn Scammers  

Monday, 30-Nov 07:22:57 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [124] Time Warner Cable Fires Broadside At Broadcasters
· [112] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [96] Apple Joins AT&T Verizon Snark Fest
· [87] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [82] Weekend Open Thread
· [80] TiVo Sees Record Customer Losses
· [79] Verizon CEO: Hulu Will Be Dead Soon
· [69] In-Flight Internet Headed For Bumpy Landing?
· [63] Thanksgiving Open Thread
· [41] ICANN Slams DNS Redirection
Most people now reading
· Are GPS's better today? [General Questions]
· Considering Leaving Vonage, who should I Consider? [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Is Easynews down? [Filesharing Software]
· [Newsgroups] Newzleech down? [Filesharing Software]
· [How to] Install Asterisk on an Asus WL-520GU router [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Grey Cup on the Web? [Canadian Chat]
· Help with an old Photograph [Avatar/Graphics Help]
· Leveling to 85 [World of Warcraft]