Good signal, low speeds in Sprint Mobile Broadband http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r22545283 en Thu, 03 Dec 2009 06:34:11 EDT Thu, 03 Dec 2009 06:34:11 EDT Re: Good signal, low speeds http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22584583 Belinrahs :
quote:
Anyway...now Sprint has joined the SmartPhone revolution...let's sell the ability to send as much useless stuff as we can over our limited bandwidth....But let's not add any infastructure to support all the new bandwidth hungry apps.


You made me remember! I totally forgot - Palm Pre. Maybe that isn't helping. Let's hope that hype dies down soon.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22584583 Sat, 20 Jun 2009 20:46:40 EDT Re: Good signal, low speeds http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22551487 cbobby : from my experience. I was with AT&T, the day they released the iPhone, my signal was strong and solid, the speed dropped to sub dial-up. After several calls to tech, I stumbled on an honest tech to said "oh you noticed that"..

story short, switched to Sprint with a Mill BYOD plan.
when the leaves came out had to ad an Amp.

By the way...........I can't say enough about Jim in VA at EDVO Tips and Tweaks, his website has helped me navigate this moras of what I term BroadBand Redlining. Youse live in the wrong place, youse get no service.

Anyway...now Sprint has joined the SmartPhone revolution...let's sell the ability to send as much useless stuff as we can over our limited bandwidth....But let's not add any infastructure to support all the new bandwidth hungry apps.

So in good times, I get up to 1.9 downloads.
But when the Tower is clogged, .25. I know it's app overload becase my upload speeds are 4X the download speed.
All with a Strong signal.

Seems like a metaphor for our current financial hole....spend and expect more than you can support.

Was that a screed or what :)]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22551487 Sun, 14 Jun 2009 22:12:19 EDT Re: Good signal, low speeds http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22549175 Belinrahs :
said by Sprint_MBB See Profile :

Beli,
I'm no expert, but can share what worked for me.

I had a Pantech PX-500 and Wilson Omni. It was picking up two towers (there are apparently only two in range in my very rural area). My RSSI would bonce around and I didn't stay connected. Take a look at Jim_in_VA's website:

»evdotips.blogspot.com/

Look at how to use the debugging screen in the connection manager:
»evdotips.blogspot.com/2008/02/co···ens.html
»evdotips.blogspot.com/2008/03/de···ned.html

Look and see how many towers the omni is reading and follow his advice. I didn't do this when I had the omni, and recently went to a Sierra 598U and Wilson directional. When I used the debugging screen, I found I had the antenna pointed at the wrong tower for best service!

I have detailed this somewhat in another post in this section.

Long story short, I went from an intermittent connection and at best .3 down and .03 up with 260+ latency to a max of 1.4 down and .24 up with 170 latency.
I would go with this, however even with the omni, I only pick up one tower. And fortunately it's not intermittent, I don't disconnect at all! It's great in terms of reliablilty. Considering what's been said I'm willing to say that I'm getting top speed from my tower.
--
DW6000/1m dish/SatMex5(99'W)/Small Office/Windows XP/Dell Latitude D820/DNS cache + TurboPage disabled, using OpenDNS!!!

PEANUT BUTTER JELLY TIME!!!]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22549175 Sun, 14 Jun 2009 12:13:16 EDT Re: Good signal, low speeds http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22548853 Jack_in_VA :

On the speedtest page look at the info block where it compares your test with the averages. Bottom line is if it's not there to start with no amount of fiddling, tweaking, antennas or amps will produce any significant results. Another point is I've notice latency has little effect on speed results. Low latency does not equate into higher speeds.

Download:

My average: 1.08
Sprint U.S. Average: 1.01

Upload:

My average: 0.25
Sprint U.S. Average: 0.28

]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22548853 Sun, 14 Jun 2009 10:40:44 EDT Re: Good signal, low speeds http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22548089 Sprint_MBB : Beli,
I'm no expert, but can share what worked for me.

I had a Pantech PX-500 and Wilson Omni. It was picking up two towers (there are apparently only two in range in my very rural area). My RSSI would bonce around and I didn't stay connected. Take a look at Jim_in_VA's website:

»evdotips.blogspot.com/

Look at how to use the debugging screen in the connection manager:
»evdotips.blogspot.com/2008/02/co···ens.html
»evdotips.blogspot.com/2008/03/de···ned.html

Look and see how many towers the omni is reading and follow his advice. I didn't do this when I had the omni, and recently went to a Sierra 598U and Wilson directional. When I used the debugging screen, I found I had the antenna pointed at the wrong tower for best service!

I have detailed this somewhat in another post in this section.

Long story short, I went from an intermittent connection and at best .3 down and .03 up with 260+ latency to a max of 1.4 down and .24 up with 170 latency. The Speedtests I've done since then have all been .7~.9 down and .2~.3 up with latency under 200. My connection has been steady for over a day! I used to have to power cycle the router at least once a day with the old setup.

What I can't understand on your Speedtest is the high latency and low upload rate. I think it may be worthwhile to pickup a directional antenna and try the debugging software.

Let us know how it works out.

I just ran another Speedtest:

This new setup rocks!!!
--
Old setup: Wilson omni, Cellmate 2000, Pantech PX-500 in Linksys WRT543G3-ST.
Current setup: Wilson yagi, Cellmate 2000, Sierra 598U in Cradlepoint MBR1000.
Pending: Cyfre CA-819 amp & parabolic grid.
Thanks to Jim_in_VA for the tips!]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22548089 Sun, 14 Jun 2009 00:51:06 EDT Re: Good signal, low speeds http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22545979 Belinrahs : I probably am on a single T1 tower then. Anyways though, I can live with this speed :)

Thanks Jack_in_VA]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22545979 Sat, 13 Jun 2009 14:30:34 EDT Re: Good signal, low speeds http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22545450 Jack_in_VA :
said by Belinrahs See Profile :

Hey everyone. I have a Franklin CDU-680 from Millenicom I got a while ago - I recently mounted and connected the 32" omni external antenna from 3GStore to improve my signal, and it did improve to about -72dBm. However I'm still a little unsatisfied with the speed.

That isn't super bad, but at my signal I should be able to get better speeds. My location is Nashville, MI zip 49073. I get constant EVDO Rev. A just fine, no problem as long as I'm connected to the omni. Any help is appreciated very much!

Thanks, Beli
If you are on a single T-1 tower your speed is very good. The most you can expect with a perfect signal strength is around 1.2MB down.

Here's my results with a -72dBm signal. Single T-1 tower.

]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22545450 Sat, 13 Jun 2009 12:12:00 EDT Good signal, low speeds http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22545283 Belinrahs : Hey everyone. I have a Franklin CDU-680 from Millenicom I got a while ago - I recently mounted and connected the 32" omni external antenna from 3GStore to improve my signal, and it did improve to about -72dBm. However I'm still a little unsatisfied with the speed.



That isn't super bad, but at my signal I should be able to get better speeds. My location is Nashville, MI zip 49073. I get constant EVDO Rev. A just fine, no problem as long as I'm connected to the omni. Any help is appreciated very much!

Thanks, Beli]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22545283 Sat, 13 Jun 2009 11:20:42 EDT