Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » comments on review of Callcentric » Looking to migrate from Callvantage
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
64
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
« Using Call Treatments for time based Do Not Disturb rules  
AuthorAll Replies
-


igotthisone

join:2001-11-23
Davidson, NC
·Callcentric
·AT&T CallVantage

reply to Mat
Re: Looking to migrate from Callvantage

1. Yes you need to choose both, and yes you need an inbound number to port. I used a temporary one for the period I was testing. I'd recommend reading the following »www.callcentric.com/faq/17#29

2. I selected "Pay per Call" for $1.95/month and $0.015/minute to test with the intention to switching to unlimited once I decided if the service was right for me. Because I calculated I would need to use over 1596 minutes a month to break even with the unlimited plan incoming and outgoing I'm staying with the "Pay per Call" as my primary plan.

3. Yes you can switch at a later time if you think you need more or less.

4. Not exactly the same as CallVantage. They do offer a feature called "Call Treatment" and "DID Forwarding" that aren't exactly the same but do allow customized routing of very specific scenarios or general scenarios. This isn't the same though as what you have used.


Mat



I am also a current customer of AT&T Callvantage and wanted to test these guys out. I have a few questions.
1. Do we need to select an inbound product and an outbound product? If I read right, we need an inbound product to get our number ported.
2. If we have to take an inbound product what was your selection?
3. Do you know if its possible to change the outbound product selection later? Like if I see my usage has changed, can I switch from pay per call to unlimited?
4. One of the feature that I liked with AT&T was the 'Locate Me' with simultaneous ring? Does Callvantage have the same or do I have to forward the call each time I go anywhere?

Thanks in advance
Mat
Forums » comments on review of Callcentric« Using Call Treatments for time based Do Not Disturb rules  


Thursday, 03-Dec 11:52:35 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [162] Comcast Releasing Promised Usage Meter
· [120] Avast Antivirus Has Gone Mad
· [103] Graduate Student Unveils Sprint's GPS Sharing With Feds
· [80] Latest Consumer Reports Survey Not Kind To AT&T
· [70] Baltimore To Ban Lazy Cable Installs
· [63] Broadband Killed The Game Console
· [60] Comcast Makes NBC Universal Acquisition Official
· [55] Rogers Unveils The ISP Dream Model
· [47] ACTA: Global Three Strikes
· [42] Cable Industry's 'Adoption Plus': Altruism Or PR Stunt?
Most people now reading
· False positive in Avast! or is it real? [Security]
· Many Sites Unreachable [Rogers]
· [TWC] Audio/Video outage in Brooklyn [Time Warner Cable TV/Voice]
· [Rant] Disrespect of PTO [Rants, Raves, and Praise]
· Quality/longevity of 15A 120V receptacles [Home Repair & Improvement]
· Patch 3.3 preperation [World of Warcraft]
· Warrior tank seem underpowered these days [World of Warcraft]
· Surfers beware !!! [TekSavvy]
· Microsoft actively urges IE 6 users to upgrade [Security]