<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Re: I don&#x27;t see a a problem&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-I-dont-see-a-a-problem-22558928</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:14:20 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:14:20 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: I don&#x27;t see a a problem</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-I-dont-see-a-a-problem-22563483</link>
<description><![CDATA[manfmmd posted : Libel and slander have nothing to do with free speech and I never said that the 1st Amendment was only about free speech.  You'll notice there isn't a single U.S. vs. Anyone in that entire section.<br><br>Libel and slander has to do with causing harm to an entity by using false statements or testimony and depends on the medium and audience as to whether is qualifies as libel or slander.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-I-dont-see-a-a-problem-22563483</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 22:48:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: I don&#x27;t see a a problem</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-I-dont-see-a-a-problem-22562669</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : Your rate plan is in the contract you should be reading before signing as I clearly wrote above.<br><br>As a sales person you can say whatever you want but if you contradict the contract terms or promise what you know you can't deliver you'll probably be fired once the customer complains about it.  As you should know, the CSRs have no power to change the terms and if they say something which appears to do that--and the customer relies on that information--the company will duly exercise employee disciplinary procedures and release the customer from whatever obligation resulted.  The company can easily escape your fraud allegation by pointing to the contract and their swift, decisive action regarding the agent who exceeded his authority.<br><br>Car salesmen are covered by specific laws, and yes if they can get you to buy it they certainly will sell you the worst car on the lot.  If you are stupid enough to believe them without taking advantage of the consumer protections the law provides than you deserve to be the sucker.<br><br>What school is your law degree from?  Mine's DePaul.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-I-dont-see-a-a-problem-22562669</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 20:26:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: I don&#x27;t see a a problem</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-I-dont-see-a-a-problem-22562034</link>
<description><![CDATA[jester121 posted : The first amendment is <b>precisely</b> just the government:<br><br>"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."<br><br>It's not more than that. It is that. It doesn't need to be expounded on by a link to wikipedia. The words are small and easy to understand, with simple sentence structure.<br><br>Become a supporter of reading comprehension, it's in much more danger than free speech. Stop researching, and just read it. :)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-I-dont-see-a-a-problem-22562034</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 18:27:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: I don&#x27;t see a a problem</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-I-dont-see-a-a-problem-22561532</link>
<description><![CDATA[k1ll3rdr4g0n posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/753545" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=753545');">manfmmd</a>:</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1175917" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1175917');">k1ll3rdr4g0n</a>:</small><br><br>I also think its infiging against my 1st amendment right preventing me from speaking out as I want. But, that's just my two cents.<br> </div>The 1st Amendment is a limitation on the Federal Governments powers, nothing more.  Not private citizens, public or private corporations, just the government.<br><br>I wish people would stop misusing it as such.<br> </div>We both know that is not for me or you to decide, that is for the supreme court to decide.<br><br>To point out the facts the first amendment is, can, and <A HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1st_amendment#Libel.2C_slander.2C_and_private_action">has been used in court cases</a> with public and private matters. <br><br>The first amendment is more than just a "the government can't make laws against freedom of speech".<br><br>If you haven't noticed by now I am a supporter of free speech. I believe everyone should be able to say what they want and feel without fear of retribution (within reason and the situation...ie don't tell a terminal patient he is going to die).<br><br>I wish people would do some research.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-I-dont-see-a-a-problem-22561532</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 16:58:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: I don&#x27;t see a a problem</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-I-dont-see-a-a-problem-22561490</link>
<description><![CDATA[k1ll3rdr4g0n posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/402245" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=402245');">AlexNYC</a>:</small><br><br>You may want to hide the email addresses from that pdf ...<br> </div> <blockquote><small>quote:</small><hr>Here it is, even though I expose my email, I don't care. Gmail does a good job with spam, and I really don't use it for anything.<hr></blockquote>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-I-dont-see-a-a-problem-22561490</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 16:50:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: I don&#x27;t see a a problem</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-I-dont-see-a-a-problem-22561479</link>
<description><![CDATA[k1ll3rdr4g0n posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by Post Now :</small><br><br>Your AT&T Store example has no associated law to be broken.  All your recording would do is possibly let you back out of the contract you should have read completely, that does specifically lay out the terms, charges and has a clause stating that store agents and employees do not have the authority to change any of them.  You would get the agent in trouble and nothing else would happen.  Sorry to pop your balloon.<br> </div>Please explain your reasoning. No where in the TOS does it say my rate plan?<br><br>Also <A HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fraud">fraud</a> IS a crime.<br> <blockquote><small>quote:</small><hr>A civil fraud typically involves the act of intentionally making a false representation of a material fact, with the intent to deceive, which is reasonably relied upon by another person to that person's detriment.<hr></blockquote><br> I can't tell you one thing and turn around do something completely different without the customer being able to do something about it. Are you saying that as a CSR I can say whatever to the customer (such as a cell phone can do this and that) and when they come back and say it doesn't I can tell them to screw off? Absolutely not. If I have in writing or a recording that you were telling me that the cell phone could do X Y and Z just to sell it to me when it doesn't that is fraud plan and simple. What about car salesmen? Do they not have to abide by some rule of conduct? Or can they just tell me the worst car on the lot is the best?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-I-dont-see-a-a-problem-22561479</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 16:49:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: I don&#x27;t see a a problem</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-I-dont-see-a-a-problem-22561461</link>
<description><![CDATA[AlexNYC posted : You may want to hide the email addresses from that pdf ...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-I-dont-see-a-a-problem-22561461</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 16:45:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: I don&#x27;t see a a problem</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-I-dont-see-a-a-problem-22561012</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : Your AT&T Store example has no associated law to be broken.  All your recording would do is possibly let you back out of the contract you should have read completely, that does specifically lay out the terms, charges and has a clause stating that store agents and employees do not have the authority to change any of them.  You would get the agent in trouble and nothing else would happen.  Sorry to pop your balloon.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-I-dont-see-a-a-problem-22561012</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 15:45:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: I don&#x27;t see a a problem</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-I-dont-see-a-a-problem-22560715</link>
<description><![CDATA[BBBanditRuR posted : The client/server model, under certain microscopes, can be applied to a lot of things that would certainly violate the TOS. Servers being run for profit, malware, spam and other types of traffic, specific to solely being distributed (FTP) are illegal/violations of the TOS. You can't place hosting an online game server (i.e. L4D lobby system) or VPN to transfer files to your workplace in the same category. I assume that's what "Frank" envisions as permissible. Then again, the TOS is made by the company, maybe they are subjective when it comes to these things...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-I-dont-see-a-a-problem-22560715</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 14:50:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: I don&#x27;t see a a problem</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-I-dont-see-a-a-problem-22560069</link>
<description><![CDATA[manfmmd posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1175917" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1175917');">k1ll3rdr4g0n</a>:</small><br><br>I also think its infiging against my 1st amendment right preventing me from speaking out as I want. But, that's just my two cents.<br> </div>The 1st Amendment is a limitation on the Federal Governments powers, nothing more.  Not private citizens, public or private corporations, just the government.<br><br>I wish people would stop misusing it as such.<br><small>--<br>If the road to Hell is paved with good intentions, what is the road to Heaven paved with?<br><br>Obama 2008 - Where Transparent = Opaque</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-I-dont-see-a-a-problem-22560069</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 12:59:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: I don&#x27;t see a a problem</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-I-dont-see-a-a-problem-22559801</link>
<description><![CDATA[k1ll3rdr4g0n posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/416162" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=416162');">GeekJedi</a>:</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1175917" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1175917');">k1ll3rdr4g0n</a>:</small><br><br>Comcast's Rep Frank told me that using torrent's isn't against the TOS so I don't see how this is (torrent's are technically individual servers and clients in themselves so Frank has now sanctioned using servers on Comcast. Doesn't matter what it says in the TOS; Frank is the mouth piece of corporate.). I have the email to prove it if anyone wants me to post it.<br> </div>Quote applicable law, please?  It's pretty explicitly implied that in the case of ambiguity, the TOS is the final authority on what is allowed or prohibited, not "Frank".  "Frank" is in fact not the mouthpiece of the company.  If "Frank" told you that your service is free, Comcast would not be obligated to provide you service for free.  You don't get to pick and choose here.<br><br>But hey, if you feel you've found a loophole, enjoy...<br> </div>I was waiting for a "you found a loophole but it doesn't work" post.<br><br>I think we need a reality check for law. If I walk into a AT&T corp. store and purchase a new phone, ask about data plan and they say it will be free and I have it on recording - if AT&T charges me .01c for data then they have broken the law. In this certain instance I think that would be considered bait and switch. We can even go a step further and say that if I inquired after I had the phone for weeks and they said it would be free - AT&T cannot charge me anything (assuming of course I can prove that they told me it would be free).<br><br>Just because a CSR may have said something, doesn't mean they aren't held by law by it. So, your telling me that I can go around saying that this ball of wax is magical healing powers which it really does not?<br><br>This isn't a loophole, it's the law. Doesn't matter what the TOS say, if the CSR says it and you have proof - then the company has to abide by it - unless of course we shouldn't trust what CSR tell us? The CSR are the ones that interpert the TOS to the customer, if they don't full understand it, that's not a loophole, that's just stupidity on the companies part and they should higher smarter CSRs or train the ones they have better.<br><br>How about this - next time you sign up for service over the phone, such as high speed internet, and the CSR quotes you $50/month but when you get the bill you are paying $60/month don't even think of coming back here to complain because you think it's a "loophole".<br><br>To make my point more apparent, and to test those who actually read the PDF, I emailed the RFC definition of a server - you can NOT argue that - to Frank and he indirectly said that torrents and services like logmein that by definition are a server ARE allowed. The next person who posts - think about what I want you to take away from it - not a license for you host servers but a point that ISPs don't care if you do run a server that isn't bandwidth intensive.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-I-dont-see-a-a-problem-22559801</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 12:13:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: I don&#x27;t see a a problem</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-I-dont-see-a-a-problem-22559697</link>
<description><![CDATA[GeekJedi posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1175917" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1175917');">k1ll3rdr4g0n</a>:</small><br><br>Comcast's Rep Frank told me that using torrent's isn't against the TOS so I don't see how this is (torrent's are technically individual servers and clients in themselves so Frank has now sanctioned using servers on Comcast. Doesn't matter what it says in the TOS; Frank is the mouth piece of corporate.). I have the email to prove it if anyone wants me to post it.<br> </div>Quote applicable law, please?  It's pretty explicitly implied that in the case of ambiguity, the TOS is the final authority on what is allowed or prohibited, not "Frank".  "Frank" is in fact not the mouthpiece of the company.  If "Frank" told you that your service is free, Comcast would not be obligated to provide you service for free.  You don't get to pick and choose here.<br><br>But hey, if you feel you've found a loophole, enjoy...<br><small>--<br>The goal of the broadcast engineer is to get all the meters on the transmitter to go as far to the right as possible!!</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-I-dont-see-a-a-problem-22559697</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 11:54:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: I don&#x27;t see a a problem</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-I-dont-see-a-a-problem-22559538</link>
<description><![CDATA[k1ll3rdr4g0n posted : Here it is, even though I expose my email, I don't care. Gmail does a good job with spam, and I really don't use it for anything.<br><br>Even though he does say server's aren't allowed, his response to bittorrent and other service protocols are that those are ok.<br>You can't pick and choose, I quoted him the RFC definition for server and he still said that Bittorrent and logmein are ok as long as long as its not very high bandwidth requirements. For those who claim that this is "tap dancing" around the TOS - I really doubt any ISP would care if you were carefully using any server on the network. Setting up a file hosting site is a no-no, running your own blog probably wont attract any attention.<br><br>I also think its infiging against my 1st amendment right preventing me from speaking out as I want. But, that's just my two cents.<div class="borderless"><TABLE WIDTH=95% align=center border=0 CELLPADDING=4"><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/r0/download/1439890~ebebfd325476a16837c29cdee0436a37/Gmail%20-%20[TOS%20Questions].pdf">Gmail - [TOS&middot;&middot;&middot;ons].pdf</A></TD></TABLE></div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-I-dont-see-a-a-problem-22559538</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 11:32:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: I don&#x27;t see a a problem</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-I-dont-see-a-a-problem-22558990</link>
<description><![CDATA[ISurfTooMuch posted : Actually, in all seriousness, I think you should share it.  Any decent CSR or tech should know not to say anything, especially in written format, that contradicts company policy, so let's see what Frank's interpretation of Comcast's policy  is.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-I-dont-see-a-a-problem-22558990</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 09:59:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>I don&#x27;t see a a problem</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/I-dont-see-a-a-problem-22558928</link>
<description><![CDATA[k1ll3rdr4g0n posted : Comcast's Rep Frank told me that using torrent's isn't against the TOS so I don't see how this is (torrent's are technically individual servers and clients in themselves so Frank has now sanctioned using servers on Comcast. Doesn't matter what it says in the TOS; Frank is the mouth piece of corporate.). I have the email to prove it if anyone wants me to post it.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/I-dont-see-a-a-problem-22558928</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 09:51:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

