In this case NO PROOF of distribution was provided. The entire judgement is based on the assumption that distribution occurred. $1.92B based on an unproved assumption. Quite incredible.
----- ----- "Unproved assumption"! Hello??? Ever heard of the OJ Simpson trial? Who needs proof of any crime for conviction (or vise versa) when you have a jury of "a moron's" peers? (unlike peers of the accused). Why be shocked? It's tough to find 12 intelligent people in one room at the same time these days.
