<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Re: Dual-WAN Router - Traffic Control?&#x27; in forum &#x27;Networking&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-DualWAN-Router-Traffic-Control-22578699</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:21:23 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:21:23 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Dual-WAN Router - Traffic Control?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-DualWAN-Router-Traffic-Control-22648232</link>
<description><![CDATA[tubbynet posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/443491" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=443491');">Nightfall</a>:</small><br><br>The straight scoop is that you can accomplish this in the Linksys model. You don't need to go out and buy a Zyxel or Sonicwall like Lethal has said.<br></div>thats true, but nothing looks sexier than a cisco isr sitting on the desk passing packets ;-)<br>mmmm....loves me some dynamic policy nat...<br><br>[edit]<br>additionally, with cisco devices you could set up ip-sla to monitor your outgoing interfaces with something like a set of pings.  if the pings are dropped by one interface, it will report as down to the router and take all traffic that was exiting the interface that went down and push it out the interface that is still standing.<br><br>q.<br><small>--<br>"...if I in my north room dance naked, grotesquely before my mirror waving my shirt round my head and singing softly to myself..."</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-DualWAN-Router-Traffic-Control-22648232</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 01:13:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Dual-WAN Router - Traffic Control?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-DualWAN-Router-Traffic-Control-22646389</link>
<description><![CDATA[Nightfall posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/843138" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=843138');">Matt</a>:</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/581584" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=581584');">Leathal</a>:</small><br><br>I don't think you can do that without having load balance turned on because if you disable load balancing the 2nd WAN becomes a backup WAN which most firewall don't allow normal or otherwise configured traffic to pass-through it because it's in stand by mode.<br></div>You can do that. That is what I said I looked up in the Linksys RV042 manual. <br><br>I decided to go about it a different way that doesn't even require a load balancing router (because I don't want load balancing) by just manipulating my routing tables.<br> </div>The straight scoop is that you can accomplish this in the Linksys model.  You don't need to go out and buy a Zyxel or Sonicwall like Lethal has said.  Load balancing on or not, you can specify the traffic to go out one interface or the other.  Heck, when I had a dual WAN connection, I had all the FTP traffic going out the second connection.  I disconnected the second connection and about 3 days later was trying to figure out why my FTP sessions weren't working.  I literally had to go into the router and turn off that rule.<br><br>Ah well.<br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://www.nightfall.net">My domain - Nightfall.net</a></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-DualWAN-Router-Traffic-Control-22646389</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 17:31:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Dual-WAN Router - Traffic Control?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-DualWAN-Router-Traffic-Control-22646264</link>
<description><![CDATA[Matt posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/581584" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=581584');">Leathal</a>:</small><br><br>I don't think you can do that without having load balance turned on because if you disable load balancing the 2nd WAN becomes a backup WAN which most firewall don't allow normal or otherwise configured traffic to pass-through it because it's in stand by mode.<br></div>You can do that. That is what I said I looked up in the Linksys RV042 manual. <br><br>I decided to go about it a different way that doesn't even require a load balancing router (because I don't want load balancing) by just manipulating my routing tables.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-DualWAN-Router-Traffic-Control-22646264</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 17:09:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Dual-WAN Router - Traffic Control?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-DualWAN-Router-Traffic-Control-22646254</link>
<description><![CDATA[Leathal posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/843138" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=843138');">Matt</a>:</small><br><br>That is called sticky connections. You may refer to it as IP binding, although I would disagree as that implies something completely different to me.<br><br>I was asking if I could tell the router to send all traffic out a specific WAN port. For example, if I ALWAYS wanted my streaming radio connection to go out WAN2 rather than load balance it and randomly assign it to a WAN port. You are misunderstanding what I am asking for.<br> </div>I don't think you can do that without having load balance turned on because if you disable load balancing the 2nd WAN becomes a backup WAN which most firewall don't allow normal or otherwise configured traffic to pass-through it because it's in stand by mode.<br><br>And what you have load balance turned you have to make sure IP binding (as sonicwall calls it) sticky session is enabled. <br><br>Leathal<br> ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-DualWAN-Router-Traffic-Control-22646254</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 17:07:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Dual-WAN Router - Traffic Control?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-DualWAN-Router-Traffic-Control-22646237</link>
<description><![CDATA[Matt posted : That is called sticky connections. You may refer to it as IP binding, although I would disagree as that implies something completely different to me.<br><br>I was asking if I could tell the router to send all traffic out a specific WAN port. For example, if I ALWAYS wanted my streaming radio connection to go out WAN2 rather than load balance it and randomly assign it to a WAN port. You are misunderstanding what I am asking for.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-DualWAN-Router-Traffic-Control-22646237</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 17:03:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Dual-WAN Router - Traffic Control?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-DualWAN-Router-Traffic-Control-22646227</link>
<description><![CDATA[Leathal posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/843138" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=843138');">Matt</a>:</small><br><br>According to the manual, the RV042 supports this too. It's a simple firewall setting.<br><br>As far as "enabling it" since when did Zywall and Sonicwall obtain the ability to read minds? How do they know I want my streaming radio station to go out over WAN2 instead of WAN1? Why hasn't this technology been paraded? I think you're confusing my question with sticky sessions. They are two different things.<br> </div>It's simple you are confusing the basic principle of how IP binding works. <br><br>IP binding takes the destination IP address and binds it to the WAN port it connects through initially until the session is closed. <br><br>So if you are requesting a audio stream from di.fm through your winamp and the firewall talks to DI's servers on WAN2 initially it will automatically bind the IP to WAN2 until the session is closed. Not having IP binding enabled allows the load balance to randomly decide which WAN port it will request additional information from automatically.<br><br>Basically you have to remember, what goes out must come in. In the case of HTTPS connections servers bind your incoming connection to your IP address (like Nightfall said) if you are not binding the IP address on your firewall then the load balance "may" decide to use the opposite WAN port on the next request and the session will be terminated by the destination server. :)<br><br>Leathal]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-DualWAN-Router-Traffic-Control-22646227</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 17:01:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Dual-WAN Router - Traffic Control?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-DualWAN-Router-Traffic-Control-22644739</link>
<description><![CDATA[Nightfall posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/843138" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=843138');">Matt</a>:</small><br><br>According to the manual, the RV042 supports this too. It's a simple firewall setting.<br><br>As far as "enabling it" since when did Zywall and Sonicwall obtain the ability to read minds? How do they know I want my streaming radio station to go out over WAN2 instead of WAN1? Why hasn't this technology been paraded? I think you're confusing my question with sticky sessions. They are two different things.<br> </div>Thats correct Matt.<br><br>Setting this up in the Linksys unit is so easy.  In fact, you do have to setup a rule like this in ANY ROUTER that you want to have the flow of one specific kind of traffic go through one connection.<br><br>If you don't set this up, then the load balancing does as it was designed to do which is use the connection that is the least utilized.  This can be bad in terms of secure connections like HTTPS which is why all secure connections should go through one of your two connections.  Switching it over is a simple drop down selection in the router if you have a line outage.<br><br>All dual WAN routers I have setup have this ability and are just as easy to implement.<br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://www.nightfall.net">My domain - Nightfall.net</a></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-DualWAN-Router-Traffic-Control-22644739</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 12:07:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Dual-WAN Router - Traffic Control?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-DualWAN-Router-Traffic-Control-22644218</link>
<description><![CDATA[Matt posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/581584" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=581584');">Leathal</a>:</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/443491" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=443491');">Nightfall</a>:</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/581584" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=581584');">Leathal</a>:</small><br><br>that's why Matt needs to find a router that does IP binding on the load balancing if he want's to still be able to use NLB. Something which the linksys doesn't support...<br><br>Leathal<br> </div>Actually, the Linksys RV082 does support that.  I have set that up before and its not hard to setup.<br> </div>You shouldn't have to setup anything other than enabling it which is how it's done in the industry. The firewall itself should be smart enough to know how to use it otherwise you have a problem. :-)<br><br>Leathal<br> </div>According to the manual, the RV042 supports this too. It's a simple firewall setting.<br><br>As far as "enabling it" since when did Zywall and Sonicwall obtain the ability to read minds? How do they know I want my streaming radio station to go out over WAN2 instead of WAN1? Why hasn't this technology been paraded? I think you're confusing my question with sticky sessions. They are two different things.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-DualWAN-Router-Traffic-Control-22644218</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 10:28:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Dual-WAN Router - Traffic Control?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-DualWAN-Router-Traffic-Control-22643909</link>
<description><![CDATA[Leathal posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/443491" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=443491');">Nightfall</a>:</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/581584" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=581584');">Leathal</a>:</small><br><br>that's why Matt needs to find a router that does IP binding on the load balancing if he want's to still be able to use NLB. Something which the linksys doesn't support...<br><br>Leathal<br> </div>Actually, the Linksys RV082 does support that.  I have set that up before and its not hard to setup.<br> </div>You shouldn't have to setup anything other than enabling it which is how it's done in the industry. The firewall itself should be smart enough to know how to use it otherwise you have a problem. :-)<br><br>Leathal]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-DualWAN-Router-Traffic-Control-22643909</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 09:35:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Dual-WAN Router - Traffic Control?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-DualWAN-Router-Traffic-Control-22643879</link>
<description><![CDATA[Nightfall posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/581584" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=581584');">Leathal</a>:</small><br><br>that's why Matt needs to find a router that does IP binding on the load balancing if he want's to still be able to use NLB. Something which the linksys doesn't support...<br><br>Leathal<br> </div>Actually, the Linksys RV082 does support that.  I have set that up before and its not hard to setup.<br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://www.nightfall.net">My domain - Nightfall.net</a></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-DualWAN-Router-Traffic-Control-22643879</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 09:24:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Dual-WAN Router - Traffic Control?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-DualWAN-Router-Traffic-Control-22643772</link>
<description><![CDATA[Leathal posted : You may have to look at something more expensive to do IP binding on NLB such a Zywall, or SonicWALL, I am sure there other products with at the same hardware/software level as those who support IP binding.<br><br>Leathal]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-DualWAN-Router-Traffic-Control-22643772</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 08:59:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Dual-WAN Router - Traffic Control?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-DualWAN-Router-Traffic-Control-22643762</link>
<description><![CDATA[Leathal posted : that's why Matt needs to find a router that does IP binding on the load balancing if he want's to still be able to use NLB. Something which the linksys doesn't support...<br><br>Leathal]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-DualWAN-Router-Traffic-Control-22643762</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 08:56:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Dual-WAN Router - Traffic Control?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-DualWAN-Router-Traffic-Control-22582131</link>
<description><![CDATA[Matt posted : Thanks guys. It looks like the RV042 does what I need. For clarification, I don't mind creating say, one rule for all HTTPS traffic. I absolutely wanted to avoid having to create a hackish rule for each website I wanted to visit.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-DualWAN-Router-Traffic-Control-22582131</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 07:46:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Dual-WAN Router - Traffic Control?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-DualWAN-Router-Traffic-Control-22580413</link>
<description><![CDATA[Bink posted : I have to concur with  tubbynet <A HREF="/useremail/u/1520629"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>.  Even the consumer-class devices still use some kind of rule-based or ACL-based method to point the traffic to where you want it to go&#151;it just might be hidden behind a &#147;friendly&#148; GUI.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-DualWAN-Router-Traffic-Control-22580413</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 20:04:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Dual-WAN Router - Traffic Control?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-DualWAN-Router-Traffic-Control-22580256</link>
<description><![CDATA[tubbynet posted : while i don't use a dual-wan router myself, i've configured up quite a few of them in the medium-business/school district space using cisco routers.<br>nothing is more powerful than an acess-list and route-maps!<br><br>:D<br><br>q.<br><small>--<br>"...if I in my north room dance naked, grotesquely before my mirror waving my shirt round my head and singing softly to myself..."</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-DualWAN-Router-Traffic-Control-22580256</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 19:29:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Dual-WAN Router - Traffic Control?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-DualWAN-Router-Traffic-Control-22580249</link>
<description><![CDATA[Nightfall posted : Matt,<br><br>I have done this before.  In one example, I had HTTPS traffic flowing through one of the two connections.  Mainly because load balancing HTTPS traffic is hard to do.  Most secure sites remember one IP address for a transaction or when you are filling out a form.  Having that data load balance may trip the security and cause a HTTPS error.<br><br>So it is possible yes.  :)<br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://www.nightfall.net">My domain - Nightfall.net</a></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-DualWAN-Router-Traffic-Control-22580249</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 19:27:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Dual-WAN Router - Traffic Control?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-DualWAN-Router-Traffic-Control-22580202</link>
<description><![CDATA[keeska posted :  <blockquote><small>quote:</small><hr>For those of you with Dual-WAN routers, what sort of control do you have over your traffic?<hr></blockquote><br><br>Limit specific IP address and/or ports and/or types of traffic (deep packet inspection) to a single link.<br> <br>Specify what percentage of traffic is sent over each outgoing link based on src and/or destination ip address and/or port<br><br>Load balance each link based on static bandwidth.<br><br>Load balance each link based on actually measured bandwidth.<br><br>Detect upstream blackhole and reroute all traffic to the remaining link.<br><br>Use QoS to route traffic to the least used link or to separate traffic keeping high priority traffic in the front of the queue on a given link.<br><br>There are a few more features but I have not really used them.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-DualWAN-Router-Traffic-Control-22580202</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 19:17:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Dual-WAN Router - Traffic Control?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-DualWAN-Router-Traffic-Control-22580154</link>
<description><![CDATA[Matt posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/656685" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=656685');">drew</a>:</small><br><br>Interestingly enough, I think he might be purchasing a RV042 here soon ;)<br> </div>hax0r! r u in mi internets?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-DualWAN-Router-Traffic-Control-22580154</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 19:08:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Dual-WAN Router - Traffic Control?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-DualWAN-Router-Traffic-Control-22579935</link>
<description><![CDATA[drew posted : He's referring to a way of making sure, for example, VNC traffic goes out WAN1 rather than WAN2.<br><br>More likely VoIP traffic than VNC, but you get the idea.<br><br>Interestingly enough, I think he might be purchasing a RV042 here soon ;)<br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://www.dslreports.com/forum/pubgames">Come play Mafia!</a> | <A HREF="http://ppd.wundervoll.us">My Picture Blog</a></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-DualWAN-Router-Traffic-Control-22579935</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 18:22:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Dual-WAN Router - Traffic Control?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-DualWAN-Router-Traffic-Control-22579779</link>
<description><![CDATA[jimbopalmer posted : As you see, VNC is allowed via WAN1<div class="borderless"><TABLE WIDTH=95% align=center border=0 CELLPADDING=4"><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/22579779?c=1441007&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IyMjU4MDE1NC54bWw%3D"><IMG class="apic" BORDER=0 TITLE="65219 bytes" WIDTH=600 HEIGHT=332 SRC="/r0/download/1441007.thumb600~5800fc0ce877da681008112af777f57d/protocol per WAN port.jpg/thumb.jpg" ALT="Click for full size"></A></TD></TABLE></div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-DualWAN-Router-Traffic-Control-22579779</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 17:52:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Dual-WAN Router - Traffic Control?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-DualWAN-Router-Traffic-Control-22579519</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : Most of the dual wan port routers i have used (linksys and Netgear) have a protocol binding feature that lets you force certains protocols or ports over specific wan links. Works quite well from what i can remember. This was all done through the GUI interface, and was pretty simple to do.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-DualWAN-Router-Traffic-Control-22579519</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 17:03:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Dual-WAN Router - Traffic Control?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/DualWAN-Router-Traffic-Control-22578699</link>
<description><![CDATA[Matt posted : For those of you with Dual-WAN routers, what sort of control do you have over your traffic? For example, can you send HTTP across one link but FTP across another without resorting to manual firewall rule creation?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/DualWAN-Router-Traffic-Control-22578699</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 14:35:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

