<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Re: There is a difference&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-There-is-a-difference-22581210</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:16:35 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:16:35 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: There is a difference</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-There-is-a-difference-22613238</link>
<description><![CDATA[alanxenos posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/708401" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=708401');">Catmando</a>:</small><br><br>ATT is not a division of comcast and the sale of there product in the Chicago land area was complete and final. ATT has comparable products like Call Advantage, UVERSE which can go as fast as 18Mbps down and 10Mbps up it also can offer over a 100 channels in HD depending on how far you are from the VRAD you are. ATT also offer DSL which can go as fast as 6Mbps down and 768kbps up and it's price very reasonable. ATT got out of the cable business because the future in the technology was limited and was getting to close to the end. ATT discovered fiber has a bigger future due unlimited bandwidth that can be exploited from it.<br> </div>Cable had a fine future in 2001, and AT&T [notice the & in AT&T] will milk copper as long as possible, where as FiOS costs more, but is true FTTP. BTW, CallVantage shut down (good, it sucks monkey nuts).<br>See my reviews of:<br>AT&T CallVantage<br>SBC Yahoo! DSL<br>Comcast<br>Dish Network<br><small>--<br>"When it comes to technology, if you are not part of the steamroller, you are part of the road." -Anon.<br>Find me @: &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.tinyurl.com/alanxweb" >www.tinyurl.com/alanxweb</A></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-There-is-a-difference-22613238</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 03:16:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: There is a difference</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-There-is-a-difference-22587177</link>
<description><![CDATA[alanxenos posted : What I meant was, I signed on with ATT Broadband, and am still w/ comcast after the sale went through. thanks 4 pointing it out.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-There-is-a-difference-22587177</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 14:08:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>There is a difference</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/There-is-a-difference-22581210</link>
<description><![CDATA[Catmando posted : ATT is not a division of comcast and the sale of there product in the Chicago land area was complete and final. ATT has comparable products like Call Advantage, UVERSE which can go as fast as 18Mbps down and 10Mbps up it also can offer over a 100 channels in HD depending on how far you are from the VRAD you are. ATT also offer DSL which can go as fast as 6Mbps down and 768kbps up and it's price very reasonable. ATT got out of the cable business because the future in the technology was limited and was getting to close to the end. ATT discovered fiber has a bigger future due unlimited bandwidth that can be exploited from it.<br><small>--<br>Catmando</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/There-is-a-difference-22581210</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 23:04:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

