iPod Touch ZyWall Log Entries in ZyXEL http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r22588534 en Mon, 30 Nov 2009 12:44:10 EDT Mon, 30 Nov 2009 12:44:10 EDT Re: iPod Touch ZyWall Log Entries http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22646917 tnroroc : The thing is I am trying to get the iPod Touch Remote App to work. If you are not familiar, this app allows one to remotely control their iTunes over a network (in this case my local home network) so I am thinking I may need to allow this in order to get this to work.

How is this multicast different from the Network / LAN / LAN TCP/IP / Multicast dropdown in the ZW5 configuration?
--
rok - Enjoy this game called life, nobody is actually keeping score. ;)]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22646917 Thu, 02 Jul 2009 19:30:34 EDT Re: iPod Touch ZyWall Log Entries http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22622892 dslpartner : I assume your iPod works just fine now, so I'd guess no.
In general it is for your LAN and for the iPod to discover servers and their names on your LAN, it will most likely not work across your ISP's network anyway so no need to allow it.
--
"Perl is executable line noise, Python is executable pseudo-code."
]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22622892 Sun, 28 Jun 2009 03:55:54 EDT Re: iPod Touch ZyWall Log Entries http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22614713 tnroroc : Is that traffic something I "should" be allowing for the sake of the iPod?]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22614713 Fri, 26 Jun 2009 11:33:14 EDT Re: iPod Touch ZyWall Log Entries http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22589686 dslpartner : According to IANA 224.0.0.251 is multicast DNS, »www.multicastdns.org/
--
"Perl is executable line noise, Python is executable pseudo-code."
]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22589686 Mon, 22 Jun 2009 07:01:54 EDT iPod Touch ZyWall Log Entries http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22588534 tnroroc : Whenever my iPod Touch connects to my wireless network, I get the following in my ZW5 log as (WLAN --> WLAN/ZyWall) entries.

I believe these 224.*.*.* are broadcast stuff, is that correct?

Any idea why the iPod would be doing this?

As you can see, my default firewall setup is dropping these, should I allow them?

Thanks!


1  2009-06-21 20:42:45 Firewall default policy: UDP (WL to WL/ZW) aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd:5353 224 .0.0.251:5353 ACCESS DROPPED 
2  2009-06-21 20:42:12 Firewall default policy: UDP (WL to WL/ZW) aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd:5353 224 .0.0.251:5353 ACCESS DROPPED 
3  2009-06-21 20:41:56 Firewall default policy: UDP (WL to WL/ZW) aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd:5353 224 .0.0.251:5353 ACCESS DROPPED 
4  2009-06-21 20:41:48 Firewall default policy: UDP (WL to WL/ZW) aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd:5353 224 .0.0.251:5353 ACCESS DROPPED 
5  2009-06-21 20:41:44 Firewall default policy: UDP (WL to WL/ZW) aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd:5353 224 .0.0.251:5353 ACCESS DROPPED 
6  2009-06-21 20:41:42 Firewall default policy: UDP (WL to WL/ZW) aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd:5353 224 .0.0.251:5353 ACCESS DROPPED 
7  2009-06-21 20:41:42 Firewall default policy: IGMP (WL to WL/ZW) aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd 224.0.0 .251 ACCESS DROPPED 
8  2009-06-21 20:41:41 Firewall default policy: UDP (WL to WL/ZW) aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd:5353 224 .0.0.251:5353 ACCESS DROPPED 
9  2009-06-21 20:41:41 Firewall default policy: UDP (WL to WL/ZW) aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd:5353 224 .0.0.251:5353 ACCESS DROPPED 
10  2009-06-21 20:41:41 Firewall default policy: UDP (WL to WL/ZW) aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd:5353 22 4.0.0.251:5353 ACCESS DROPPED 
11  2009-06-21 20:41:40 Firewall default policy: UDP (WL to WL/ZW) aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd:5353 22 4.0.0.251:5353 ACCESS DROPPED 
12  2009-06-21 20:41:35 Firewall default policy: IGMP (WL to WL/ZW) aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd 224.0. 0.251 ACCESS DROPPED 
13  2009-06-21 20:41:35 Firewall default policy: IGMP (WL to WL/ZW) aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd 224.0. 0.2 ACCESS DROPPED 
14  2009-06-21 20:41:34 DHCP server assigns IP:aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd to Dad-s-Touch(00:aa:bb:cc: dd:ee).       
15  2009-06-21 20:41:34 Firewall rule match: UDP (WL to WL/ZW, rule:2) 0.0.0.0:68 255.255. 255.255:67 ACCESS PERMITTED


--
rok - Enjoy this game called life, nobody is actually keeping score. ;)]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22588534 Sun, 21 Jun 2009 20:50:42 EDT