republican-creole
site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
1615
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

dcdeadbeat5

join:2008-10-07
Washington, DC

still no FIOS in DC but Comcast saves the day

Most of us in DC have given up waiting for FIOS and ordered Comcast. And without asking, Comcast has once again upped the ante with faster speeds and even less.

My Comcast costs me $25 a month and I get 23Mbps down, 4Mpbs up. How can Verizon even begin to compete here?

It's a case of too little, too expensive, too late.

See ya Verizon (or more aptly: Fio-what? Oh yea...they never could get their act together even in the nation's capital).


aaronwt
Premium
join:2004-11-07
Woodbridge, VA
Reviews:
·Verizon FiOS

1 edit

said by dcdeadbeat5:

Most of us in DC have given up waiting for FIOS and ordered Comcast. And without asking, Comcast has once again upped the ante with faster speeds and even less.

My Comcast costs me $25 a month and I get 23Mbps down, 4Mpbs up. How can Verizon even begin to compete here?

It's a case of too little, too expensive, too late.

See ya Verizon (or more aptly: Fio-what? Oh yea...they never could get their act together even in the nation's capital).
In my area(Nothern VA) Comcast charges $52.95 for the 20mbs tier, $62.95 for the 30mbs tier, and $100 for the 50mbs tier.
FIOS charges me $90 for their 50mbs tier. Plus all the FIOS tiers have a much faster upload speed than Comcast.

UncleDirtNap

join:2006-08-26
Pittsburgh, PA

1 edit

reply to dcdeadbeat5
Sorry but all us former Comcast customers know those speeds are complete sham. They're theoretical to start and no customer ever sees them in real life and that's before the prime time slowdowns when the shared lines are under heaviest use - assuming the services is actually even available.

My FIOS line however tests at or above advertised speed 24/7 365.

Three years now with FIOS and not a single day of down time.


UncleDirtNap

join:2006-08-26
Pittsburgh, PA

reply to aaronwt
Comparing Comcast/cable to FIOS in this manner is a waste of time. Nobody ever gets anywhere near the speeds Comcast/cable claims and they'll just keep throwing out bigger and bigger numbers out to suck in customers.

The technology is what it is and there's no getting around it and cable is an inferior technology no matter what outlandish claim the cablecos are making on a given day.

Had them all, had DSL, had Comcast cable have FIOS and FIOS beats them hands down in every way and by big margins.


dcdeadbeat5

join:2008-10-07
Washington, DC

1 edit

reply to UncleDirtNap

said by UncleDirtNap:

Sorry but all us former Comcast customers know those speeds are complete sham. They're theoretical to start and no customer ever sees them in real life and that's before the prime time slowdowns when the shared lines are under heaviest use - assuming the services is actually even available.

My FIOS line however tests at or above advertised speed 24/7 365.

Three years now with FIOS and not a single day of down time.
You really should try cable again. I was under that same false impression and I have to say that I was pleasantly surprised. Comcast really got their act together. I NEVER see a slowdown even during peak times it always test at over 23Mbps down, 4Mbps up. So stop fooling yourself that FIOS is the only provider out there.

FIOS (which is still not available in the nation's capital except for a single condo building) is late to the party.

FIOS lost. Comcast won.

jjeffeory

join:2002-12-04
USA

reply to dcdeadbeat5

Re: still no FIOS in DC but Comcast saves the day

said by dcdeadbeat5:

Most of us in DC have given up waiting for FIOS and ordered Comcast. And without asking, Comcast has once again upped the ante with faster speeds and even less.

My Comcast costs me $25 a month and I get 23Mbps down, 4Mpbs up. How can Verizon even begin to compete here?

Thank the DC city gov't "kickback" negotiations for that. Fios is available in Nova and Maryland.
It's a case of too little, too expensive, too late.

See ya Verizon (or more aptly: Fio-what? Oh yea...they never could get their act together even in the nation's capital).

jjeffeory

join:2002-12-04
USA

reply to dcdeadbeat5
Picture quality of Comcast in DC is HORRIBLE! One of the worst I've seen around. Data has been decent.



dvd536
as Mr. Pink as they come
Premium
join:2001-04-27
Phoenix, AZ
kudos:4

reply to dcdeadbeat5

said by dcdeadbeat5:

My Comcast costs me $25 a month and I get 23Mbps down, 4Mpbs up. How can Verizon even begin to compete here?
Because unlike your powerboost poisoned comcast speedtests, fios can give you those speeds ALL THE TIME, not just a 20 second burst.
--
When I gez aju zavateh na nalechoo more new yonooz tonigh molinigh - Ken Lee

dcdeadbeat5

join:2008-10-07
Washington, DC

said by dvd536:

said by dcdeadbeat5:

My Comcast costs me $25 a month and I get 23Mbps down, 4Mpbs up. How can Verizon even begin to compete here?
Because unlike your powerboost poisoned comcast speedtests, fios can give you those speeds ALL THE TIME, not just a 20 second burst.
Actually I don't have PowerBoost provisioned on my speed tier (I am only paying $25 a month). Speed stays consistent the entire time and does not drop off. So yes I really am getting above my tier and not with PowerBoost.

This is typical for Comcast here in DC. It may be different in other areas. I have Comcast Business at work and it also does not appear to use PowerBoost. In fact I was told that we are getting Docsis 3 for the same price and that the connection will go as fast as the modem will currently go (around 33Mbps down, 4Mbps up). Comcast told me if I wanted faster than that all I would have to do is upgrade to a newer modem.

So to put it in another way, I get this speed at work and and home ALL THE TIME.

FIOS? It won't be rolled out here until 2014. So I think that puts FIOS speed at 0.

dcdeadbeat5

join:2008-10-07
Washington, DC

reply to jjeffeory

said by jjeffeory:

said by dcdeadbeat5:

Thank the DC city gov't "kickback" negotiations for that. Fios is available in Nova and Maryland.

There were no kickback negotiations, unless you mean Verizon's unwillingless to wire poor areas of the District. Comcast just beat FIOS to the finish line here and then dropped the price to an affordable level for everyone.

Nova and Maryland are different states so whatever FIOS and Comcast offer and charge there has no relation to what happens in DC.

dcdeadbeat5

join:2008-10-07
Washington, DC

reply to jjeffeory

said by jjeffeory:

Picture quality of Comcast in DC is HORRIBLE! One of the worst I've seen around. Data has been decent.
My picture quality is incredibly sharp with my TIVO. I don't have anything to compare it to as FIOS won't be widely available in the nation's capital for another 4 years.

UncleDirtNap

join:2006-08-26
Pittsburgh, PA

reply to jjeffeory
Picture quality of all cable, especially HD channels, is demonstrably inferior to FIOS. Cable doesn't have the bandwidth to feed true HD signals and is forced to compress them.

My friends in the city, were FIOS TV still isn't available, routinely travel to our place to watch the UFC events, Hockey championships, Superbowl etc etc because the picture on the same Panasonic Viera plasmas just plain sucks and they're paying more to boot. It's only a matter of time as ALL of them are already FIOS customers the minute it becomes available.

Comcast is all hype and they lost me as a customer FOREVER.


dcdeadbeat5

join:2008-10-07
Washington, DC

said by UncleDirtNap:

Picture quality of all cable, especially HD channels, is demonstrably inferior to FIOS. Cable doesn't have the bandwidth to feed true HD signals and is forced to compress them.

My friends in the city, were FIOS TV still isn't available, routinely travel to our place to watch the UFC events, Hockey championships, Superbowl etc etc because the picture on the same Panasonic Viera plasmas just plain sucks and they're paying more to boot. It's only a matter of time as ALL of them are already FIOS customers the minute it becomes available.

Comcast is all hype and they lost me as a customer FOREVER.
FIOS won't be widely available in DC until 2014. 5 years is a very long time and it will be an entirely different competition by then.


heiro

@cox.net

reply to dcdeadbeat5
Wow, so you cant get FiOS so automatically Cable is better? You really sound biased. Youre trying to get a guy who's had Cable, then switched to FiOS and kept it for 3 straight years, to switch back to Cable? "Comcast won, Fios lost (because you cant get it) LOL. Its FACTUAL that FiOS has faster internet and better TV picture quality. You CANNOT argue it. Just because FiOS has limited availability does not mean its inferior to cable. I have had Comcast and currently have Cox, and they are both horrible. I just ordered FiOS yesterday.


Saturday, 02-Jun 13:54:18 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics