<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>new provisioning question.. in Earthlink DSL</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r22597170</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 12:10:20 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 12:10:20 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: new provisioning question..</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22614093</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/372021"><b>Doctor Olds</b></A> : I would still run the test as posted by  DrStrange <A HREF="/useremail/u/436079"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> ;)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22614093</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 09:46:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: new provisioning question..</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22613953</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/462452"><b>sdillman</b></A> : Thanks to the Dr.s for the info.. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22613953</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 09:26:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: new provisioning question..</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22613335</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/372021"><b>Doctor Olds</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  sdillman <A HREF="/useremail/u/462452"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>So, Doctor Olds, any thoughts on the new numbers? <br><br>I'm getting 1.5/768 pretty reliably these days and the connection NEVER drops, like it use to at least once a day... But I wouldn't mind 3.0 now that I use XBMC to stream a lot of video.. :)<br> </div>I concur with  DrStrange <A HREF="/useremail/u/436079"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>'s diagnosis. ;)  You are getting pretty much the max the line can deliver under the current conditions.  10 dB is about as low as you want to go to remain stable.<br><br><A HREF="http://www.dslreports.com/faq/6734">How do I check modem statistics/event logs? What do the numbers mean?</a><br><br><div class="bquote">Although what is monitored and the exact name may be different depending on manufacturer, the overall information is pretty much the same.  Below are some of the common terms and measurements used to judge line quality. Remember these are not hard numbers but simply a generalization of line statistics:<br><br><b>SN Margin (AKA Signal to Noise Margin or Signal to Noise Ratio)</b><br>Relative strength of the DSL signal to Noise ratio. <b>6dB</b> is generally the lowest dB manufactures specify in order for the modem to be able to synch. In some instances <b><A HREF="/faq/2182">interleaving</a></b> can help raise the noise margin to an acceptable level.  Generally speaking, as overall bandwidth increases, your signal to noise ratio decreases.  So a customer that upgrades from 1.5 to 6.0 service will typically see a corresponding decrease in the signal to noise ratio. The <b>higher</b> the number the better for this measurement.<br><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bred.gif">6dB or below is bad and will experience no synch or intermittent synch problems<br><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bred.gif">7dB-10dB is fair but does not leave much room for variances in conditions  <br><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bred.gif">11dB-20dB is good with no synch problems<br><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bred.gif">20dB-28dB is excellent<br><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bred.gif">29dB or above is outstanding<br><br><b>Line Attenuation</b><br>Measure of how much the signal has degraded between the DSLAM and the modem. Maximum signal loss recommendation is usually about <b>60dB</b>. One of the biggest factors affecting line attenuation is distance from the DSLAM.  Generally speaking, bigger distances mean higher attenuation.  The <b>lower</b> the dB the better for this measurement.<br><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bred.gif">20dB and below is outstanding <br><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bred.gif">20dB-30dB is excellent<br><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bred.gif">30dB-40dB is very good<br><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bred.gif">40dB-50dB is good<br><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bred.gif">50dB-60dB is poor and may experience connectivity issues<br><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bred.gif">60dB or above is bad and will experience connectivity issues</div><br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/ford-gt/">What&#146;s the point of owning a supercar if you can&#146;t scare yourself stupid from time to time?</a></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22613335</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 04:42:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: new provisioning question..</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22602823</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/436079"><b>DrStrange</b></A> : Looks like you're maxed out at 1792kbps down. At that data rate, your S/N margin is 10dB, which is about the lowest margin you should have to avoid connection problems.<br><br>If you're not already using a whole-house splitter and a 'home-run' to your modem, connect your modem directly to the NID [usually outside] and see if the stats are any better there.<br>&raquo;<A HREF="/faq/earthlink">EarthLink DSL FAQ</A> &raquo;<A HREF="/faq/10860">How do I test at my NID? What does it look like?</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22602823</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 12:18:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>new provisioning question..</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22597170</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/462452"><b>sdillman</b></A> : I'm actually finally getting around to replying to this old thread ( &raquo;<A HREF="/forum/remark,21745689">[Services] Current Verizon deal</A> ). I keep forgetting to pull my DSL numbers and post them.. Well I'm stuck at home today and actually remembered I wanted to do this, so here we go:<br><br>New numbers:<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://dreamcycle.net/images/modemvz_02.jpg" >dreamcycle.net/images/modemvz_02.jpg</A><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://dreamcycle.net/images/modemvz_03.jpg" >dreamcycle.net/images/modemvz_03.jpg</A><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://dreamcycle.net/images/modemvz_04.jpg" >dreamcycle.net/images/modemvz_04.jpg</A><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://dreamcycle.net/images/modemvz_06.jpg" >dreamcycle.net/images/modemvz_06.jpg</A><br><br>Old numbers ( previous provisioning )<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://dreamcycle.net/images/modem01.jpg" >dreamcycle.net/images/modem01.jpg</A><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://dreamcycle.net/images/modem02.jpg" >dreamcycle.net/images/modem02.jpg</A><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://dreamcycle.net/images/modem03.jpg" >dreamcycle.net/images/modem03.jpg</A><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://dreamcycle.net/images/modem04.jpg" >dreamcycle.net/images/modem04.jpg</A><br><br>So, Doctor Olds, any thoughts on the new numbers? <br><br>I'm getting 1.5/768 pretty reliably these days and the connection NEVER drops, like it use to at least once a day... But I wouldn't mind 3.0 now that I use XBMC to stream a lot of video.. :)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22597170</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 13:40:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
