Re: its a front in http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r22600959 en Wed, 10 Feb 2010 05:01:19 EDT Wed, 10 Feb 2010 05:01:19 EDT Re: its a front http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22600959 KrK :
said by patcat88 See Profile :

And IP based cable IPTV services will magically be highest priority.
Yeah, and third party VOIP and Video will be part of the "unwashed masses" tiers... :(
--
"Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power." -- Benito Mussolini
]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22600959 Wed, 24 Jun 2009 01:18:48 EDT Re: its a front http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22599333 RARPSL :
said by patcat88 See Profile :

And IP based cable IPTV services will magically be highest priority. And this is all a front for ISPs not wanting to pay for bigger backbone and peering links. Watch the caps roll out, 10GB high priority, 100GB low priority, $1 a GB after 100GB low priority.

1000 cable modems per node FOREVER!!!!!
A major part of the problem is not the backbone and peering links but the lack of adequate bandwidth on the "Last Mile" link (ie: Between the Customer and the Cable Company's Head End). IOW: Congestion on the Last Mile not between the Head End and the Internet.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22599333 Tue, 23 Jun 2009 19:23:35 EDT its a front http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22599196 patcat88 : And IP based cable IPTV services will magically be highest priority. And this is all a front for ISPs not wanting to pay for bigger backbone and peering links. Watch the caps roll out, 10GB high priority, 100GB low priority, $1 a GB after 100GB low priority.

1000 cable modems per node FOREVER!!!!!]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22599196 Tue, 23 Jun 2009 18:56:38 EDT