republican-creole
site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


insomniac84

join:2002-01-03
Schererville, IN

2 edits

reply to Lazlow

Re: They make no sense.

said by Lazlow:

insomniac84

Why should one type of traffic receive higher priority than others? I do not VOIP and my neighbor does (we pay the same amount for internet). Why should his data get a higher priority than mine? Protocol agnostic is the only fair way to go. First come, first serve.
Well it can be protocol agnostic. I am saying look at sustained rates for specific transfers to specific hosts. VoIp isn't going to try to max out a 15mps connection, while bittorrent or other downloading will. You can leave lower bandwidth stuff alone since it's not a problem. Just throttle stuff that tries to max out the connection back enough to free up the congestion. It's way better to have a torrent drop back a few hundred kbps than it is to screw with stuff that isn't trying to use all possible bandwidth. There is no point in trying to throttle a 50kbps transfer, if another transfer is going 14.95mbps. Just throttle the faster transfer. And we are probably only talking between like 5-7pm, max. If at all.

Just throttle the specific traffic causing the problem, leave everything else alone.

Lazlow

join:2006-08-07
Saint Louis, MO

insomniac84

What you have just described is what Comcast is doing now.

The time frame will also shift from market to market. Here 7pm-10pm will (usually) be more congested than 5-7pm.


Saturday, 02-Jun 00:04:25 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics