 IPPlanManHoly Cable Modem Batman
join:2000-09-20
Washington, DC
kudos:1 | Something to look forward to with Comcast... Something to look forward to with Comcast... 
It's Comcastic! |
|
 baineschile2600 ways to livePremium
join:2008-05-10
Sterling Heights, MI | Except Comcast's cap is 250 gigs; much more reasonable than 10.
And they do supply McAfee, which does have a meter (though not as good as a router flashed with Tomato) |
|
|
|
 en102Canadian, eh?
join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA | reply to IPPlanMan
as well as AT&T and Time Warner Cable. 
--
Canada = Hollywood North |
|
AVonGaussPremium
join:2007-11-01
Boynton Beach, FL | reply to IPPlanMan
Yet, you are the one constantly advocating metered billing in the Comcast HSI forum. I think your comment may be out of place as Comcast has not announced any attention to do metered billing at this time. |
|
IPPlanManHoly Cable Modem Batman
join:2000-09-20
Washington, DC
kudos:1
3 edits | That's right... I am!
I think metered billing is a great idea.
Based on Cogeco, I think they're going to screw it up bigtime if they try it.
That doesn't mean that it shouldn't be done.
It should be done well.
My case for metered billing is that it encourages infrastructure investment. What incentive does Comcast have to invest in its infrastructure when you pay them a flat fee each month no matter how much you use... (well, up to 250GB that is).... |
|
Reviews:
 ·Verizon FiOS
| up front statement: I hate the concept of metered billing.
that being said, if it's going to be done, it has to be done well. but there should also be an independent entity (govt or otherwise) that certifies the accuracy of the metering system the ISP is using - much like what is done with gas pumps, electric meters, water meters, etc.
if they want to charge by the bit, they should be made to prove they are accurately measuring the bits being used. |
|
baineschile2600 ways to livePremium
join:2008-05-10
Sterling Heights, MI | reply to AVonGauss
I dont advocate it, i just think the current comcast cap is reasonable. I would prefer an uncapped, unmetered, unthrottled service; just as most heavy internet users would. |
|
IPPlanManHoly Cable Modem Batman
join:2000-09-20
Washington, DC
kudos:1 | reply to nasadude
Damn right! |
|
 KilroyPremium,MVM
join:2002-11-21
Ann Arbor, MI | reply to IPPlanMan
said by IPPlanMan:My case for metered billing is that it encourages infrastructure investment. What incentive does Comcast have to invest in its infrastructure when you pay them a flat fee each month no matter how much you use... (well, up to 250GB that is).... Great in theory. Unproven in reality. The encouragement for infrastructure should be customer retention and acquisition. Unfortunately if there is no competition there is no reason to do anything for the customer.
--
When will the people realize that with DRM they aren't purchasing anything? |
|
rcabor4
join:2007-04-17
Grand Prairie, TX | reply to IPPlanMan
said by IPPlanMan:That's right... I am! I think metered billing is a great idea. My case for metered billing is that it encourages infrastructure investment. What incentive does Comcast have to invest in its infrastructure when you pay them a flat fee each month no matter how much you use... (well, up to 250GB that is).... But if you cap the amount, then why would you need to invest in infrastructure. The need for growth would come to a crawl/stop. This is why its so attractive for the ISPs, more revenue, no video competition, no need to upgrade network capacity, and crazy profits! |
|
IPPlanManHoly Cable Modem Batman
join:2000-09-20
Washington, DC
kudos:1 | Damn right. |
|
| reply to IPPlanMan
not use where you get comcast out of this. sound like a hater. comcast has not said anything about metered billing. |
|
| reply to IPPlanMan
The only way to do it well is to not do it at all.
Encourages infrastructure investment?!?! Are you serious?!?! Do you actually want me to believe that anyone who implements metered billing is going to use that money to reinvest in infrastructure? BS! Roger isn't. If anything, now that caps keep people from using the high-bandwidth applications they want to use, it will only justify then continuing to NOT reinvest in infrastructure.
The incentive to invest in your infrastructure while charging a flat fee is that that flat fee is still orders of magnitude greater than the cost of infrastructure. The current flat fees being charged are more than enough to rake in fat profits even AFTER using a little to upgrade networks to keep up with the pace of traffic growth.
Your case for metered billing is unfounded. |
|
| reply to nasadude
As opposed to customer choice to go with another provider?
This just in "Obama names metered billing Czar"
Sarcasm: Where do I sign up for this |
|
Romney2012Defeat Obama 2012-Chg we can believe inPremium
join:2002-03-03
USA
kudos:4 | reply to IPPlanMan
said by IPPlanMan:Something to look forward to with Comcast... It's Comcastic! I thought this was a thread about Cogeco. Why are you talking about Comcast?
--
My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page |
|
| reply to nasadude
said by nasadude:that being said, if it's going to be done, it has to be done well. but there should also be an independent entity (govt or otherwise) that certifies the accuracy of the metering system the ISP is using - much like what is done with gas pumps, electric meters, water meters, etc. I haven't seen any independent govt agency checking my electrical or water meter. Does that happen? Is this also applicable to cell phones minutes too? |
|
patcat88
join:2002-04-05
Jamaica, NY
kudos:1 | said by yt:I haven't seen any independent govt agency checking my electrical or water meter. Does that happen? Is this also applicable to cell phones minutes too? Electrical and water meters you can get tests done on, mandated by law by your local PUC or Weights and Measures Dept.
Not sure who regulated cellphone minutes accuracy. |
|
 knightmbEverybody Lies
join:2003-12-01
Franklin, TN | reply to Michael Chaney
said by Michael Chaney :
The only way to do it well is to not do it at all.
Encourages infrastructure investment?!?! Are you serious?!?! Do you actually want me to believe that anyone who implements metered billing is going to use that money to reinvest in infrastructure? BS! Roger isn't. If anything, now that caps keep people from using the high-bandwidth applications they want to use, it will only justify then continuing to NOT reinvest in infrastructure.
The incentive to invest in your infrastructure while charging a flat fee is that that flat fee is still orders of magnitude greater than the cost of infrastructure. The current flat fees being charged are more than enough to rake in fat profits even AFTER using a little to upgrade networks to keep up with the pace of traffic growth.
Your case for metered billing is unfounded.
It's ok, let them shoot each other in the foot. It just makes my ISP business better because I don't mess with meters. As one ISP to the others, meters are for making money, not expanding services and upgrading your infrastructure to handle more customers.
Bandwidth gets cheaper every day, but rather than pass along the savings, they pocket the money.
--
Fight Insight Ready (Was NebuAD) and the like:
Click Here to pollute their data |
|
IPPlanManHoly Cable Modem Batman
join:2000-09-20
Washington, DC
kudos:1 | reply to Romney2012
I understand it's about Cogeco...
I expect the same level of competency from Comcast if they tried metered billing.
That doesn't mean that I don't think that it shouldn't be done.
It should be done well. |
|
approval from:
PIZZAMAN76 
| reply to IPPlanMan
And while they are at it, any meter needs to ignore:
a) reset packets if the provider throttles the connection (the cabeco/telco is doing this for their benefit, not mine)
b) ad insertion content (stuff I didn't ask for)
c) any cableco/telco 'test' packets/probes to customer premises (not on my dime) |
|
