<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Routing between the same subnet in Networking</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r22603404</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 11:39:48 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 11:39:48 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Routing between the same subnet</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22628264</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/712841"><b>carp</b></A> : Do you have Spanning Tree enabled on the switches?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22628264</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 12:43:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Routing between the same subnet</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22625287</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/226051"><b>bbarrera</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  A900MHz Fan <A HREF="/useremail/u/1040002"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Yes, there is a group of RVON gear spread out at different locations via wireless, fiber and standard Cat5e links.  There is other equipment that is on the same switch(es) as the RVON. </div>I suspect you have a lot of VoIP traffic from LAN to Internet and that is reason for 'slowdown' -- it would really help if you explained what you meant by slowdown. If you have significant VoIP traffic to/from the Internet then you either need more bandwidth or a better router.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22625287</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 19:41:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Routing between the same subnet</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22621443</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/495027"><b>billaustin</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  A900MHz Fan <A HREF="/useremail/u/1040002"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Single switch would be nice but I must use existing infrastructure. I will have to just live with the slowdown, which really seems to only manifest in the Linksys router.  <br><br>I appreciate the responses guys!<br><br>Neal<br> </div>If the slowdown is in the router, that's what you should look at replacing.  I would suggest a router with a little more horsepower.  I run Mikrotik on an older PC and use multiple AP's for wireless coverage.  The Netopia 3386-ENT is also a decent little unit.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22621443</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 18:28:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Routing between the same subnet</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22620733</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1387340"><b>elnino</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  tschmidt <A HREF="/useremail/u/239636"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  A900MHz Fan <A HREF="/useremail/u/1040002"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br> There is other equipment that is on the same switch(es) as the RVON.<br> </div>Do your switches support trunking or plug in high speed ports? That way you can upgrade the link between switches.<br><br>/tom<br> </div>Each switch has 2 gigabit ports on them, that should be plenty of uplink speed even when they aren't bonded.<br><br>I'm still not sure why you can't keep the existing subnet for the RVON stuff and then make a new subnet for everything else.  If the network is designed as the picture above (with the Internet switch as a different subnet), there's no reason I can see why it wouldn't work.  If there needs to be broadcast traffic from the internet subnet to the RVON side, then you can't separate them.  As long as the second router has NAT disabled, every device can be accessed as if they were on the same subnet.<br><br>I couldn't find any info online about RVON devices so I'm not sure how that protocol or whatever actually work]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22620733</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 14:21:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Routing between the same subnet</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22620302</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/239636"><b>tschmidt</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  A900MHz Fan <A HREF="/useremail/u/1040002"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br> There is other equipment that is on the same switch(es) as the RVON.<br> </div>Do your switches support trunking or plug in high speed ports? That way you can upgrade the link between switches.<br><br>/tom]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22620302</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 12:18:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Routing between the same subnet</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22619837</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1040002"><b>A900MHz Fan</b></A> : Yes, there is a group of RVON gear spread out at different locations via wireless, fiber and standard Cat5e links.  There is other equipment that is on the same switch(es) as the RVON.<br><br>Neal]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22619837</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 10:05:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Routing between the same subnet</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22618202</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/226051"><b>bbarrera</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  A900MHz Fan <A HREF="/useremail/u/1040002"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>I will have to just live with the slowdown, which really seems to only manifest in the Linksys router.</div>Can you explain that a bit more? Does the RVON gear talk to RVON gear in another office?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22618202</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 21:02:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Routing between the same subnet</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22618146</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1040002"><b>A900MHz Fan</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  Cabal <A HREF="/useremail/u/1432955"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>There's nothing to stop you from filtering on the bridge. It works well for devices that have a need for same-subnet access but can't be filtered on the host (but there are plenty of other ways of doing so). A dumb bridge wouldn't gain you anything, of course.<br> </div>I have never attempted such a thing, where can I get more information and equipment to do this?<br><br>Neal]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22618146</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 20:48:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Routing between the same subnet</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22612770</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1432955"><b>Cabal</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  A900MHz Fan <A HREF="/useremail/u/1040002"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  elnino <A HREF="/useremail/u/1387340"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  A900MHz Fan <A HREF="/useremail/u/1040002"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>     :</small><br><br>Would a bridge not forward all broadcast from the RVON though?  Using two subnets is not an option. </div>No, a bridge/switch would forward broadcast traffic to everyone on that subnet.  The only way to create a new broadcast domain is to install a router and make a new subnet.  Switches separate collision domains; routers separate broadcast domains.<br><br>Have you sniffed the traffic to see that it is broadcast traffic?  Do you realize you're also using non-RFC1918 IP addresses for your internal network?<br> </div>The 192.170.1.xxx was chosen as more than 50% of the gear came with that block OEM.<br><br>So are you saying there is no same subnet routing solution?<br><br>Neal<br> </div>There's nothing to stop you from filtering on the bridge. It works well for devices that have a need for same-subnet access but can't be filtered on the host (but there are plenty of other ways of doing so). A dumb bridge wouldn't gain you anything, of course.<br><small>--<br>Interested in <A HREF="http://www.romraider.com/">open source engine management</a> for your Subaru?</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22612770</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 00:04:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Routing between the same subnet</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22612248</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1040002"><b>A900MHz Fan</b></A> : Single switch would be nice but I must use existing infrastructure. I will have to just live with the slowdown, which really seems to only manifest in the Linksys router.  <br><br>I appreciate the responses guys!<br><br>Neal]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22612248</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 22:11:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Routing between the same subnet</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22611639</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/239636"><b>tschmidt</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  A900MHz Fan <A HREF="/useremail/u/1040002"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br> So are you saying there is no same subnet routing solution?  </div>Correct - that is the definition of routing. When a host wants to send a packet to another host <b>not on the same subnet</b> it forwards it to router (also called gateway). It is the router's responsibility to figure out how to deliver the packet or at least advance it along the route to the ultimate destination. <br><br>Since you are concerned about "chatty" traffic have you though about using a single large switch? Switch back-plane is much faster then individual ports so it is able to handle a lot of traffic.<br><br>Have you done the test  elnino <A HREF="/useremail/u/1387340"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> recommended? You may find out this is much to do about nothing. Even though RVON devices constantly send packets the amount of capacity they use is minimal.<br><br>/tom ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22611639</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 20:12:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Routing between the same subnet</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22611558</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1040002"><b>A900MHz Fan</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  elnino <A HREF="/useremail/u/1387340"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  A900MHz Fan <A HREF="/useremail/u/1040002"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>    :</small><br><br>Would a bridge not forward all broadcast from the RVON though?  Using two subnets is not an option. </div>No, a bridge/switch would forward broadcast traffic to everyone on that subnet.  The only way to create a new broadcast domain is to install a router and make a new subnet.  Switches separate collision domains; routers separate broadcast domains.<br><br>Have you sniffed the traffic to see that it is broadcast traffic?  Do you realize you're also using non-RFC1918 IP addresses for your internal network?<br> </div>The 192.170.1.xxx was chosen as more than 50% of the gear came with that block OEM.<br><br>So are you saying there is no same subnet routing solution?<br><br>Neal]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22611558</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 19:51:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Routing between the same subnet</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22606183</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1387340"><b>elnino</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  A900MHz Fan <A HREF="/useremail/u/1040002"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>   :</small><br><br>Would a bridge not forward all broadcast from the RVON though?  Using two subnets is not an option. </div>No, a bridge/switch would forward broadcast traffic to everyone on that subnet.  The only way to create a new broadcast domain is to install a router and make a new subnet.  Switches separate collision domains; routers separate broadcast domains.<br><br>Have you sniffed the traffic to see that it is broadcast traffic?  Do you realize you're also using non-RFC1918 IP addresses for your internal network?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22606183</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 22:11:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Routing between the same subnet</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22605547</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1040002"><b>A900MHz Fan</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  Cabal <A HREF="/useremail/u/1432955"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  A900MHz Fan <A HREF="/useremail/u/1040002"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Every port on the RVON switch (that is connected) is constantly flashing in time with the group.</div>That's not a very good indication of capacity.<br><br>But you could easily do what you want to do with a system/router configured as a bridge, or use two subnets (simpler).<br> </div>Would a bridge not forward all broadcast from the RVON though?  Using two subnets is not an option.<br><br>Neal]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22605547</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 20:13:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Routing between the same subnet</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22605501</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1432955"><b>Cabal</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  A900MHz Fan <A HREF="/useremail/u/1040002"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Every port on the RVON switch (that is connected) is constantly flashing in time with the group.</div>That's not a very good indication of capacity.<br><br>But you could easily do what you want to do with a system/router configured as a bridge, or use two subnets (simpler).<br><small>--<br>Interested in <A HREF="http://www.romraider.com/">open source engine management</a> for your Subaru?</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22605501</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 20:01:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Routing between the same subnet</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22605479</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1040002"><b>A900MHz Fan</b></A> : RVON is all broadcast VoIP and data though, I need to keep that off the internet switch.  Every port on the RVON switch (that is connected) is constantly flashing in time with the group.<br><br>Neal]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22605479</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 19:57:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Routing between the same subnet</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22604175</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/239636"><b>tschmidt</b></A> : Ethernet switch only broadcasts frame if if it does not know which port to use. If you put all the RVON stuff on one switch then the only traffic visible to the other switch will be broadcasts and any device not directly connected to the switch.<br><br>/tom]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22604175</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 16:03:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Routing between the same subnet</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22603404</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1040002"><b>A900MHz Fan</b></A> : Is there any router (consumer) out there that can route between the same subnet?  I have a need to send Internet and RVON over a single link but I would like to keep the noisy RVON gear off the internet switch except for the single link which needs to have both.  Is this possible with something I can pick up at Best Buy?<br><br>Neal <div class="borderless"><TABLE WIDTH=95% align=center border=0 CELLPADDING=4"><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/22603404?c=1442460&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IyMjYwMzQwNC54bWw%3D"><IMG class="apic" BORDER=0 TITLE="125155 bytes" WIDTH=600 HEIGHT=479 SRC="/r0/download/1442460.thumb600~8af083cf29bdf6e10c74bb32e5fd7303/SAMESUBN.jpg/thumb.jpg" ALT="Click for full size"></A></TD></TABLE></div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22603404</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 14:06:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
