2 edits | WRT160NL LinuxPowered is here. Can a WRT610NL be far behind? I just noticed that the WRT160NL Linux-Powered Linksys router was just announced. It supports FAT16, FAT32, and NTFS USB attached drives. I could not help myself from "speculating" that a WRT610NL might be not be far behind.
»www.linksysbycisco.com/US/en/pro···WRT160NL |
|
| The WRT610N already runs Linux inside it. You can download the GPL code off the Linksys site.
I believe it can handle NTFS drives, but it's something you really shouldn't do... |
|
| said by tlhIngan:The WRT610N already runs Linux inside it. You can download the GPL code off the Linksys site. I see, strange how Linksys advertised the 160NL as being Linux-based, but does not mention Linux anywhere in the product description or specs of the 610N. |
|
 dellsweigExtreme AerobaticsPremium,MVM
join:2003-12-10
Campbell Hall, NY
kudos:1
 ·Vonage
| reply to tamanaco
Both devices are already linus based - dd-wrt runs great on them.
Possilble reason for this announcment is that they may be planning on offering a neutered version (vxworks, less mem) much as they did with the WRT54G. The WRT54GL is the linux version. |
|
| DD-WRT won't work (yet) on the 160NL since it is Atheros based will it? |
|
dellsweigExtreme AerobaticsPremium,MVM
join:2003-12-10
Campbell Hall, NY
kudos:1 Reviews:
·Vonage
| said by Exterminat0r:DD-WRT won't work (yet) on the 160NL since it is Atheros based will it? What makes you think its Atheros based?? |
|
| said by dellsweig:What makes you think its Atheros based?? Because 'Atheros' is stamped all over the IC's 
»gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/oet/forms···_pdf=pdf
»gullfoss2.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/repo···160NL%27
(Caution: something is wrong with the FCC website certificate)
DD-WRT does support some Atheros chipsets (i.e. Accton's La Fonera line-up), though I can't think of a Linksys device that has used Atheros before. The OpenWRT people seem to be salivating over the design, electronic design that is (physically it has all the appeal of a soap dish) so if can be done they will likely be the first to port a working firmware. |
|
|
|
| reply to dellsweig
»www.smallnetbuilder.com/content/···0839/96/ |
|
PrntRhdPremium
join:2004-11-03
Fairfield, CA | reply to dellsweig
Yes it is Atheros based if this is to be believed:
»www.smallnetbuilder.com/content/···0839/96/ |
|
| reply to tamanaco
I guess the big difference is the 160NL has the Atheros chipset, which has a far more "open" set of drivers than the closed-source Broadcom chipset previously used.
As in, Atheros has promised open source drivers, and some have already been released. This allows any Linux to actually follow the latest kernel releases, rather than be limited to what Broadcom provides. |
|
 NetFixerFreedom is NOT freePremium
join:2004-06-24
The 'Boro
·Vonage
 ·Cingular Wireless
 ·Comcast
 ·AT&T Southeast
| reply to Thane_Bitter
Actually nothing is wrong with the SSL certificate, you just need to use the correct hostname in the URLs:
»fjallfoss.fcc.gov/prod/oet/forms···_pdf=pdf
»fjallfoss.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/repo···160NL%27
--
A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
»portscan.dcs-net.net
»nature-pics.com |
|
 Anonymous_AnonymousPremium
join:2004-06-21
127.0.0.1
kudos:2 | reply to tamanaco
i will stick with my WRT-54gS v3 32MB ram 8MB flash |
|
