Stem Bolt
Premium
join:2002-11-08
Cleveland, OH | reply to Stem Bolt
Re: Giganews Hits 300 Days Retention
AstraWeb is officially at 305 days of retention now.
--
Dr. Web 5.0 + ThreatFire + Router/SPI |
|
imtim83
You All Deserve The Economic Meltdown
Premium
join:2001-06-03
Kenner, LA
1 edit | said by Stem Bolt  :AstraWeb is officially at 305 days of retention now. 365 day retention here we come! Hope it goes up a little more than their advertised 365 day retention for a little safety net room. Not that it would matter much with how big files are now days. Newsgroup providers would need well over 20 to 40 days more for the ideal safety net room for when usenet starts to grow bigger. Either by more uploaded useful posts or spam. Sometimes it can happen at a moments notice. I doubt any of them will do this but you never know. |
|
dvd536
as Mr. Pink as they come
Premium
join:2001-04-27
Phoenix, AZ
| reply to Stem Bolt
said by Stem Bolt :AstraWeb is officially at 305 days of retention now. Actually WHATS ON THEIR SERVERS or just what their retention settings are set to?
--
When I gez aju zavateh na nalechoo more new yonooz tonigh molinigh - Ken Lee |
|
imtim83
You All Deserve The Economic Meltdown
Premium
join:2001-06-03
Kenner, LA
| said by dvd536 :said by Stem Bolt :AstraWeb is officially at 305 days of retention now. Actually WHATS ON THEIR SERVERS or just what their retention settings are set to? Yeah I read somewhere that the actual header retention is like 40 to 60 days less which is sorta disappointing. Haven't tried Astraweb to see for myself though. Hope that isn't the case. |
|
NewsgroupRev
Premium
join:2008-06-25
| reply to Stem Bolt
Astraweb is now showing 315 days. It will be interesting to see where everyone stands on retention at the end of the year. Will they continue to grow after 365 days (Giganews and Astraweb) / 400 days (Highwinds) or will retention level off for awhile. Hopefully the providers have buffered in enough storage for Usenet growth this time around.
- NGR
Newsgroup Reviews |
|
unoriginal
join:2000-07-12
San Diego, CA
1 edit | reply to imtim83
said by imtim83 Yeah I read somewhere that the actual header retention is like 40 to 60 days less which is sorta disappointing. Haven't tried Astraweb to see for myself though. Hope that isn't the case.
:
»https://helpdesk.astraweb.com/index.php?···ewsid=20
According to their announcement of going to a year of retention, their storage includes headers as well. I can't vouch for this as I generally only look back a week or two at most. |
|
imtim83
You All Deserve The Economic Meltdown
Premium
join:2001-06-03
Kenner, LA
| said by unoriginal :said by imtim83 Yeah I read somewhere that the actual header retention is like 40 to 60 days less which is sorta disappointing. Haven't tried Astraweb to see for myself though. Hope that isn't the case.
: » https:// helpdesk.astraweb.com/index.php?···ewsid=20According to their announcement of going to a year of retention, their storage includes headers as well. I can't vouch for this as I generally only look back a week or two at most. Just got confirmation from a trusted source that Astaweb and Giganews headers are lower than their actual retention amount stated on their front page. Astraweb more so than Giganews. Sucks when a lot of indexing sites aren't going back to 400 days yet. Some only up to 300 or a little more. I know that is all we need now but what happens once we reach 350 to 400 day retention then what? I don't mind using headers I just hope all providers include a fast compression method to download 350 to 400 + days of headers. |
|
swintec
Premium
join:2003-12-19
Alfred, ME
 ·RapidVPS
·surpasshosting
 ·Sprint Mobile Broa..
 ·VoicePulse
 ·RoadRunner Cable
| said by imtim83 :Just got confirmation from a trusted source that Astaweb and Giganews headers are lower than their actual retention amount stated on their front page. Astraweb more so than Giganews. Keep in mind this is not because they choose to do it. This is something almost all providers are dealing with. The posting / retention volume has far outgrown what anyone ever thought, way back when. For example, a.b.boneless has reached the limit specified in the Usenet RFC. With that said, to take and store ANY new headers for boneless, the oldest have to be purged. Granted, I have yet to see someone complain about that...as I can not imagine anyone would download ALL headers in boneless and then go through them.
To be honest, a lot of band-aids had to be applied and pushing the limits of the software had to take place for providers to get where they are now with header retention. This included custom hacks that in house development teams had to come up with.
The solution for it all is to upgrade the software to a 64 bit version. However, I have seen some news readers absolutely tank when given headers under this addressing scheme. Diablo (powering many of the servers in use today) claims a 64 bit version is in development..until then...we can only wait...and cross our fingers. 
--
Block Accounts | UseNet Now |
|
imtim83
You All Deserve The Economic Meltdown
Premium
join:2001-06-03
Kenner, LA
| said by swintec :said by imtim83 :Just got confirmation from a trusted source that Astaweb and Giganews headers are lower than their actual retention amount stated on their front page. Astraweb more so than Giganews. Keep in mind this is not because they choose to do it. This is something almost all providers are dealing with. The posting / retention volume has far outgrown what anyone ever thought, way back when. For example, a.b.boneless has reached the limit specified in the Usenet RFC. With that said, to take and store ANY new headers for boneless, the oldest have to be purged. Granted, I have yet to see someone complain about that...as I can not imagine anyone would download ALL headers in boneless and then go through them. To be honest, a lot of band-aids had to be applied and pushing the limits of the software had to take place for providers to get where they are now with header retention. This included custom hacks that in house development teams had to come up with. The solution for it all is to upgrade the software to a 64 bit version. However, I have seen some news readers absolutely tank when given headers under this addressing scheme. Diablo (powering many of the servers in use today) claims a 64 bit version is in development..until then...we can only wait...and cross our fingers. Thanks swintec! That was a very interesting read! I wonder what newsgroup providers will do once we reach in to the 1000 day retention mark ? Wonder how soon it will be as well ? Guessing at least a good 2 to 5 years from now but you never know. |
|
kamm
join:2001-02-14
Brooklyn, NY
·T-Mobile US
1 edit | reply to swintec
said by swintec : Diablo (powering many of the servers in use today) I highly doubt it - all providers I used in the past ran Highwind servers: »www.highwinds-software.com/
They have 64-bit version since ages: »archive.highwinds-software.com/b···dex.html |
|
swintec
Premium
join:2003-12-19
Alfred, ME
·RapidVPS
·surpasshosting
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·VoicePulse
·RoadRunner Cable
| Fair enough. I should have said powering many non-Highwinds servers. I know what we use now, Megabitz uses it, Xentech uses it (both of which have limited header retention), Astraweb I *think* uses Diablo, Giganews I believe uses there own system for headers.
As for Highwinds...header retention also is not the same as article retention. NGroups for instance specifically says on there site: "*Via Message-ID or .nzb. Header retention may be less."
As for Newshosting...well, I can't say for sure, why not do a full header download of a.b.boneless and let us know how many come down, and what the max age of the header is.  We will come back Sunday to find out the results. 
--
Block Accounts | UseNet Now |
|
