 44402812Hack The PlanetPremium
join:2006-08-28
Plattsburgh, NY | reply to bmize13
Re: Features said by bmize13:I'm assuming you read the whole review, including the part that says plainly, "though I certainly knew what they offered going in?" I want to be honest in the review, rather than simply cheer on / bash a service. This is just an honest view of the service so far. If they are as good as you believe them to be, it'll rise to the surface. Well then why did you give call quality and reliability only a 60 without explaining why? Same with installation unless plugging in a box and waiting 10 minutes caused you to break a sweat, what gives?  |
|
| I'm sorry, Mr. Helper. I'll do my best to ensure all reviews meet with your stringent expectations in the future, rather than communicating the actual experiences of any given user. Perhaps an Approval Committee would be in order? 
Call Quality has been rated an 80... Never was a 60. Why 80 rather than 100? Simple... Some choppiness. Not as much as other providers, but present none the less. There's not a "90" selection, so it gets 80.
Reliability at 60? That would be because I have reached 'dead air' on a couple of occasions. Not much, and very possibly related to initial setup. HOWEVER, THIS IS A REVIEW OF MY EXPERIENCES WITH THE SERVICE, and not a grandstand by which to elevate or trash any service unduly.
Do note the beginning of the review that stated I'm just starting out with them. Should the service continue to work as it should, the values will change. Should it go south, they'll also change accordingly. Frankly, I feel the review was quite generous in putting Phone Power in a positive light. |
|
|
|
44402812Hack The PlanetPremium
join:2006-08-28
Plattsburgh, NY
2 edits | said by bmize13:I'm sorry, Mr. Helper. I'll do my best to ensure all reviews meet with your stringent expectations in the future, rather than communicating the actual experiences of any given user. Perhaps an Approval Committee would be in order? Call Quality has been rated an 80... Never was a 60. Why 80 rather than 100? Simple... Some choppiness. Not as much as other providers, but present none the less. There's not a "90" selection, so it gets 80. Reliability at 60? That would be because I have reached 'dead air' on a couple of occasions. Not much, and very possibly related to initial setup. HOWEVER, THIS IS A REVIEW OF MY EXPERIENCES WITH THE SERVICE, and not a grandstand by which to elevate or trash any service unduly. Do note the beginning of the review that stated I'm just starting out with them. Should the service continue to work as it should, the values will change. Should it go south, they'll also change accordingly. Frankly, I feel the review was quite generous in putting Phone Power in a positive light. Thanks Much better! I was just curious, and no you don't need an approval committee although since the RIAA feels they are the majority ya might want to consult with them, lol.
Run this test during and\or shortly after to find out what is really going on when you have choppiness. It could very well be you ISP.
»speedtest.phonepower.com/repeat.html
I have the same problem with dead air every so often 1 call every (4-5) days with Verizon DSL. Do you have a dynamic or static IP and is your device before or after the router.
Support has concluded it is because my ht-502 is before the router and is not being sent a keep alive because of this. With Verizon DSL the IP changes every few days and when the public IP address changes it seems PhonePower won't pull the updated IP until I try making a phone call or someone calls me?
---Email From PP support--------------------------------------
The keep alive is invoked when my network sees the registration traffic request coming from a private IP. With the device in front, no keep alive is sent, so if your IP changes, then the Grandstream will have no way of relaying the IP address update to my network.
-------------------------------------------------------------
Let me know as I'm sure PhonePower would like to have more data on this. Thanks |
|
 ptrowskiGot Helix?Premium
join:2005-03-14
Putnam, CT
kudos:4 | Simple speedtests are not really a good indicator of line quality. RockyBB turned me on to one from Nuvio that I think is WAY better...
»voiptest.nuvio.com/ |
|
44402812Hack The PlanetPremium
join:2006-08-28
Plattsburgh, NY | said by ptrowski:Simple speedtests are not really a good indicator of line quality. RockyBB turned me on to one from Nuvio that I think is WAY better... » voiptest.nuvio.com/ Only problem with nuvio is no max pause or jitter? |
|
ptrowskiGot Helix?Premium
join:2005-03-14
Putnam, CT
kudos:4 Reviews:
 ·VOIPo
| said by 44402812:said by ptrowski:Simple speedtests are not really a good indicator of line quality. RockyBB turned me on to one from Nuvio that I think is WAY better... » voiptest.nuvio.com/ Only problem with nuvio is no max pause or jitter? Sure it shows them. Audio and video jitter.
--
"So, Lone Starr, now you see that evil will always triumph because good is dumb."
Have you been touched by his noodly appendage? »www.venganza.org |
|
44402812Hack The PlanetPremium
join:2006-08-28
Plattsburgh, NY | said by ptrowski:said by 44402812:said by ptrowski:Simple speedtests are not really a good indicator of line quality. RockyBB turned me on to one from Nuvio that I think is WAY better... » voiptest.nuvio.com/ Only problem with nuvio is no max pause or jitter? Sure it shows them. Audio and video jitter. Can you attach a screen shot? Thanks |
|
ptrowskiGot Helix?Premium
join:2005-03-14
Putnam, CT
kudos:4 | Run the test, it's all there. |
|
44402812Hack The PlanetPremium
join:2006-08-28
Plattsburgh, NY | said by ptrowski:Run the test, it's all there. Problem with that is your not testing the route to PP but instead to Nuvio. As you can see the results are not consistent. |
|
ptrowskiGot Helix?Premium
join:2005-03-14
Putnam, CT
kudos:4 | When you start you can put in whatever website or IP address you chose. |
|
