<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Re: See all the conditions for approval in Appendix C&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-See-all-the-conditions-for-approval-in-Appendix-C-22610026</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 06:11:45 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 06:11:45 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: See all the conditions for approval in Appendix C</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-See-all-the-conditions-for-approval-in-Appendix-C-22624024</link>
<description><![CDATA[cameronsfx posted : I guess Barack Obama's "Change" meant just Higher Taxes. :o :uhh:]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-See-all-the-conditions-for-approval-in-Appendix-C-22624024</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 13:58:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: See all the conditions for approval in Appendix C</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-See-all-the-conditions-for-approval-in-Appendix-C-22613574</link>
<description><![CDATA[iansltx posted : Uh, ClearWire doesn't have caps on their new WiMAX service.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-See-all-the-conditions-for-approval-in-Appendix-C-22613574</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 07:46:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: See all the conditions for approval in Appendix C</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-See-all-the-conditions-for-approval-in-Appendix-C-22612813</link>
<description><![CDATA[Time posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/731512" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=731512');">jjeffeory</a>:</small><br><br>U-verse experince is better than Cox in Vegas on the TV side. Embarq is a joke around here. Cox owns the market for sure. Clearwire wouldn't work for a home with that lovely 5GB cap they have! Man, Vegas needs more options! Fios here would be wonderful!<br> </div>I'd kill to have Verizon here, or even AT&T. Here's to hoping CenturyLink realizes it bit off more than it can chew and sells this market off to a real teclo.<br><small>--<br>"If it can't be done with brains, it can't be done with hours" - Clarence "Kelly" Johnson</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-See-all-the-conditions-for-approval-in-Appendix-C-22612813</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 00:16:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: See all the conditions for approval in Appendix C</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-See-all-the-conditions-for-approval-in-Appendix-C-22612519</link>
<description><![CDATA[jjeffeory posted : U-verse experince is better than Cox in Vegas on the TV side. Embarq is a joke around here. Cox owns the market for sure. Clearwire wouldn't work for a home with that lovely 5GB cap they have! Man, Vegas needs more options! Fios here would be wonderful!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-See-all-the-conditions-for-approval-in-Appendix-C-22612519</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 23:12:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: See all the conditions for approval in Appendix C</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-See-all-the-conditions-for-approval-in-Appendix-C-22611873</link>
<description><![CDATA[iansltx posted : I'm surprised nobody has done anything with Vegas...don't you guys have Clear wireless broadband now? Don't tell me it's lame; 6 Mbit down and 512k up is better than 1.5/512 on Embarq.<br><br>As for U-Verse, cable companies don't need to upgrade to even DOCSIS 2.0 to deal with them. A decent cable system (860MHz or so of bandwidth) on DOCSIS 1.1 has successfully allowed for 15/2 and even 20/1.5 internet service, which meet or beat U-Verse. Kick in some PowerBoost and U-Verse is vanquished.<br><br>The only thing that competes with DOCSIS 3 on speed is fiber at this point. VDSL2 might be an option, but nobody's deploying it.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-See-all-the-conditions-for-approval-in-Appendix-C-22611873</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 20:58:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: See all the conditions for approval in Appendix C</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-See-all-the-conditions-for-approval-in-Appendix-C-22611794</link>
<description><![CDATA[Time posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1440579" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1440579');">iansltx</a>:</small><br><br>Apples to oranges.<br><br>I'm pretty sure CenturyTel isn't in any heavily competitive markets. 20 Mbps fiber, and Windstream's 24 Mbps service, are competing against DOCSIS 1.1. By its nature, fiber can be ratcheted up to as high speeds as are needed to compete. When CenTel does fiber, it's the best-speed service in the area.<br><br>On the DSL side of things, yes it's crappy. Then again, AT&T's U-Verse tops out at 18 Mbps if you don't have TV running, 15 Mbps if you do. That's their next-generation technology. DOCSIS 3 beats that, too.<br> </div>I'd happily accept U-Verse over the 1.5 Mbps DSL that is available to me, at least it would give the local cable company a reason to transit to DOCSIS 3.0.<br><br>Vegas could be a competitive market, but Embarq ignores it. I'm pretty sure that CenturyLink will ignore it as well, which is sad because the old Sprint had this city wired with tons of fiber.<br><small>--<br>"If it can't be done with brains, it can't be done with hours" - Clarence "Kelly" Johnson</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-See-all-the-conditions-for-approval-in-Appendix-C-22611794</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 20:40:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: See all the conditions for approval in Appendix C</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-See-all-the-conditions-for-approval-in-Appendix-C-22611698</link>
<description><![CDATA[iansltx posted : Apples to oranges.<br><br>I'm pretty sure CenturyTel isn't in any heavily competitive markets. 20 Mbps fiber, and Windstream's 24 Mbps service, are competing against DOCSIS 1.1. By its nature, fiber can be ratcheted up to as high speeds as are needed to compete. When CenTel does fiber, it's the best-speed service in the area.<br><br>On the DSL side of things, yes it's crappy. Then again, AT&T's U-Verse tops out at 18 Mbps if you don't have TV running, 15 Mbps if you do. That's their next-generation technology. DOCSIS 3 beats that, too.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-See-all-the-conditions-for-approval-in-Appendix-C-22611698</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 20:23:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: See all the conditions for approval in Appendix C</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-See-all-the-conditions-for-approval-in-Appendix-C-22611429</link>
<description><![CDATA[me1212 posted : "It seems CenturyTel's idea of "FTTH" is 20 Mbps" <br><br>Its a start, at least they are doing something, and they can(and most likely will) up the speed some time.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-See-all-the-conditions-for-approval-in-Appendix-C-22611429</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 19:31:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: See all the conditions for approval in Appendix C</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-See-all-the-conditions-for-approval-in-Appendix-C-22610993</link>
<description><![CDATA[Time posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/693768" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=693768');">fifty nine</a>:</small><br><br>Same here in NJ.<br><br>I was hoping the merger would have meant some form of FTTH, but it looks like the cable company will be getting my business for now.<br> </div>It seems CenturyTel's idea of "FTTH" is 20 Mbps, which Cox can surpass fairly easily. I think those of us stuck in Embarq's service (or lack there-of) regions are screwed. As much as people rag on AT&T, at least they are working to provide something more than ADSL, 1.5 Mbps ADSL to <b>urban</b> regions at that. I could totally understand the lack of service if this was a small town with sparse farms, but you have literally a ton of customers in areas of Vegas that are either without DSL, or stuck with the lower tiers. How about some competition?<br><br>2 more years and I'm out of this hellhole, hopefully I am stationed in a Verizon FiOS area next time around.<br><small>--<br>"If it can't be done with brains, it can't be done with hours" - Clarence "Kelly" Johnson</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-See-all-the-conditions-for-approval-in-Appendix-C-22610993</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 18:23:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: See all the conditions for approval in Appendix C</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-See-all-the-conditions-for-approval-in-Appendix-C-22610648</link>
<description><![CDATA[fifty nine posted : Same here in NJ.<br><br>I was hoping the merger would have meant some form of FTTH, but it looks like the cable company will be getting my business for now.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-See-all-the-conditions-for-approval-in-Appendix-C-22610648</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 17:29:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: See all the conditions for approval in Appendix C</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-See-all-the-conditions-for-approval-in-Appendix-C-22610640</link>
<description><![CDATA[Time posted : Considering Embarq can't even deploy their highest tiers city-wide in Vegas, I don't have much hope for CenturyLink.<br><small>--<br>"If it can't be done with brains, it can't be done with hours" - Clarence "Kelly" Johnson</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-See-all-the-conditions-for-approval-in-Appendix-C-22610640</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 17:27:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: See all the conditions for approval in Appendix C</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-See-all-the-conditions-for-approval-in-Appendix-C-22610553</link>
<description><![CDATA[me1212 posted : Yeah fixed wireless would work fine. I just hope they don't us sat.<br><br>EDIT: Looks like they may be useing some wireless &raquo;<A HREF="/shownews/CenturyTel-Plans-To-Use-LTE-For-Rural-Deployment-101044">CenturyTel Plans To Use LTE For Rural Deployment</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-See-all-the-conditions-for-approval-in-Appendix-C-22610553</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 17:10:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: See all the conditions for approval in Appendix C</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-See-all-the-conditions-for-approval-in-Appendix-C-22610486</link>
<description><![CDATA[iansltx posted : The other 10% can be sat or fixed wireless. Honestly, fixed wireless would be fine with me...sat OTOH sux0rz]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-See-all-the-conditions-for-approval-in-Appendix-C-22610486</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 16:56:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: See all the conditions for approval in Appendix C</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-See-all-the-conditions-for-approval-in-Appendix-C-22610481</link>
<description><![CDATA[iansltx posted : Duly noted.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-See-all-the-conditions-for-approval-in-Appendix-C-22610481</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 16:55:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: See all the conditions for approval in Appendix C</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-See-all-the-conditions-for-approval-in-Appendix-C-22610414</link>
<description><![CDATA[Karl Bode posted : <div class="bquote">The merged company will offer retail broadband Internet access service to 100 percent of its broadband<br>eligible access lines within three years of the Transaction Closing Date.</div>That metric does include satellite.<div class="bquote">To meet this commitment the merged company will make available retail broadband Internet access service with a download speed of 768 kbps to 90 percent of its broadband eligible access lines using wireline technologies within three years of the Transaction Closing Date.</div>If they're already at 87%, DSL expansion of 1% per year is less than many companies do organically. CenturyTel tells investors they're lowering Capex, so they're actually slowing down expansion over the next three years from my understanding....<br><br>Really, these conditions on expansion aren't actually saying anything whatsoever. They're just words on a page.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-See-all-the-conditions-for-approval-in-Appendix-C-22610414</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 16:43:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: See all the conditions for approval in Appendix C</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-See-all-the-conditions-for-approval-in-Appendix-C-22610354</link>
<description><![CDATA[me1212 posted : "To meet this commitment the merged company will make available retail broadband<br>Internet access service with a download speed of 768 kbps to 90 percent of its broadband<br>eligible access lines <b>using wireline technologies</b> within three years of the Transaction<br>Closing Date.<br><br>It says they have to be wired not sat or wireless. <br><br>And <br><br>&middot; In addition, the merged company will make available retail broadband Internet access<br>service with a download speed of (1) 1.5 Mbps to 87% of the broadband eligible access<br>lines within two years of the Transaction Closing Date and (2) 3 Mbps to 75% of<br>broadband eligible access lines within one year of the Transaction Closing Date, 78% of<br>broadband eligible lines within two years of the Transaction Closing Date, and 80% of<br>broadband eligible lines within three years of the Transaction Closing Date.<br>&middot; Broadband eligible access lines are defined as retail single-line residential and single-line<br>business access lines. <br><br>If anyone cares.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-See-all-the-conditions-for-approval-in-Appendix-C-22610354</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 16:33:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: See all the conditions for approval in Appendix C</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-See-all-the-conditions-for-approval-in-Appendix-C-22610229</link>
<description><![CDATA[iansltx posted : On page 31 the broadband details are fleshed out slightly. CenLink will provide 100% penetration in three years and, by the FCC's definition of broadband, that service has to be 768+ kbps. If sat internet can't make that 768 in some areas due to capacity issues, there might be some weasel room in there for customers. In addition, for places that can't get satellite internet CenLink has to figure out some way to get at least 768k to them as a residential tier ;)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-See-all-the-conditions-for-approval-in-Appendix-C-22610229</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 16:16:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>See all the conditions for approval in Appendix C</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/See-all-the-conditions-for-approval-in-Appendix-C-22610026</link>
<description><![CDATA[ThrowDemsOut posted : If you want to see all the conditions imposed and/or agreed to, see starting at page 27(thru 31) of the FCC PDF:<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-54A1.pdf" >hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/a&middot;&middot;&middot;54A1.pdf</A><br><br>High level summary of only the broadband conditions:<br><div class="bquote">The merged company expects to make substantial additional investment in broadband services. The<br>merged company will offer retail broadband Internet access service to 100 percent of its broadband<br>eligible access lines within three years of the Transaction Closing Date.<br><br>&middot; To meet this commitment the merged company will make available retail broadband<br>Internet access service with a download speed of 768 kbps to 90 percent of its broadband<br>eligible access lines using wireline technologies within three years of the Transaction<br>Closing Date. The merged company will make available retail broadband Internet access<br>service in accordance with the FCC&#146;s current definition of broadband to the remaining<br>broadband eligible access lines using alternative technologies and operating<br>arrangements, including but not limited to satellite and terrestrial wireless broadband<br>technologies.<br><br>&middot; In addition, the merged company will make available retail broadband Internet access<br>service with a download speed of (1) 1.5 Mbps to 87% of the broadband eligible access<br>lines within two years of the Transaction Closing Date and (2) 3 Mbps to 75% of<br>broadband eligible access lines within one year of the Transaction Closing Date, 78% of<br>broadband eligible lines within two years of the Transaction Closing Date, and 80% of<br>broadband eligible lines within three years of the Transaction Closing Date.<br><br>&middot; Broadband eligible access lines are defined as retail single-line residential and single-line<br>business access lines.<br></div>You can read more detailed info on each of the above conditions in the document.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/See-all-the-conditions-for-approval-in-Appendix-C-22610026</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 15:44:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

