[Firmware] DD-WRT vs Tomato for UPnP and TCP connections in Linksys http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r22610418 en Sun, 22 Nov 2009 20:18:28 EDT Sun, 22 Nov 2009 20:18:28 EDT Re: [Firmware] DD-WRT vs Tomato for UPnP and TCP connections http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22654493 Napsterbater :
said by robewhitener See Profile :

I prefer Tomato 1.23. 1.25 seems to have some issues, but 1.23 seems to be rock solid. I'm using the Victek mod.. That guy is just amazing.
What kind of issues, 1.25 has been rock soild for me on my WRTSL54GS (man that a long model number =P)
--
AMD Phenom II x3 720 BE @ 3.5Ghz(OC) | 4Gb Memory @ 1600mhz | Sapphire ATI HD4870 1GB 800mhz/1000mhz(OC) | 2x500GB HDD's Raid 0 | Windows 7 Ultimate x64 Build 7100]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22654493 Sat, 04 Jul 2009 16:50:06 EDT Re: [Firmware] DD-WRT vs Tomato for UPnP and TCP connections http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22651526 robewhitener : I prefer Tomato 1.23. 1.25 seems to have some issues, but 1.23 seems to be rock solid. I'm using the Victek mod.. That guy is just amazing.
--

]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22651526 Fri, 03 Jul 2009 19:59:40 EDT Re: [Firmware] DD-WRT vs Tomato for UPnP and TCP connections http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22648381 RoadRunner79 : If I have DD WRT already on router is it easy to put tomato onto the router?]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22648381 Fri, 03 Jul 2009 02:35:30 EDT Re: [Firmware] DD-WRT vs Tomato for UPnP and TCP connections http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22622781 anon : thank you for pointing that out I have been out of the loop after Tomato 1.23

For my main router I agree Tomato is the way to go.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22622781 Sun, 28 Jun 2009 02:25:13 EDT Re: [Firmware] DD-WRT vs Tomato for UPnP and TCP connections http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22614937 koitsu : At this point, I would say Tomato wins out, especially with its adoption of miniupnp. The default upnp library (Intel's) and utility that comes with the stock firmware (and last I looked, DD-WRT) is atrocious.

I've covered this in the old and recent past:

»New Version Of Tomato
»wrt54gl / DD-WRT and UPnP
--
Making life hard for others since 1977.
I speak for myself and not my employer/affiliates of my employer.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22614937 Fri, 26 Jun 2009 12:06:15 EDT [Firmware] DD-WRT vs Tomato for UPnP and TCP connections http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22610418 anon : I would like to know all of yours opinions as to witch firmware has the best UPnP and TCP management ability. ]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22610418 Thu, 25 Jun 2009 16:44:38 EDT