site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

iansltx

join:2007-02-19
Golden, CO
kudos:2
Reviews:
·Comcast

reply to sonicmerlin

Re: Devil's Advocate

CenTel and Embarq tend to be in more rural areas. Not always the case, but in those areas cable generally doesn't go. Or in some situations cable is crappy. So 768k sometimes is actually a decent option...I'd much rather have 768k DSL than satellite of any speed. heck, if DIALUP went at 256k I'd pick it over satellite

sonicmerlin

join:2009-05-24
Cleveland, OH
kudos:1

Did you know over a year ago Japan launched a satellite internet service capable of 100+ mbit/s speeds so rural citizens could have fiber-quality speeds?


iansltx

join:2007-02-19
Golden, CO
kudos:2
Reviews:
·Comcast

I'll take U-Verse over 100 Mbit satellite.

1. Better uploads
2. Better latency

Now don't say satellite again or I'll slap you around with your choice of a dish or a WildBlue modem. Seriously, 1.5 seconds of latency = pull-your-hair-out-and-wonder-why-you-aren't-using-dialup.

Also, that's Japan. You're free to move.


Saturday, 02-Jun 14:10:17 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics