WFO
Premium
join:2001-08-27
San Ramon, CA
1 edit | Acronis TI Build 9796 Released 6-24 Fixed issues
• Fixed resetting of password and encryption options when editing a task prior to its first run
• Fixed the issue of incorrect log entry when scheduled task for incremental backup to USB HDD (which is recognized as non-removable) fails when this HDD is not present, but the log says "Operation has succeeded."
• Fixed loss of some default "File level security options" during My Data task creation
Known issues and limitations of the version:
• Acronis True Image Home is unable to search:
o Archives in ZIP and TIB format on removable media
o Archives in ZIP format using GDS and WDS
• Archive to various places (AVP) does not work with FTP Server and the Acronis Secure Zone.
• Acronis True Image Home doesn't support backing up in compressed zip format to CD/DVD.
• The progress bar hangs when writing backups to CD\DVD. Please note that this does not prevent successful completion of the backup.
• Acronis True Image Home does not support GUID Partition Table (GPT) and dynamic disks. Dynamic disks are a type of RAID (Redundant Array of Inexpensive Disks) storage supported by the Microsoft Windows operating system. Hardware-based RAID sets are supported by the software.
• When upgrading from Acronis True Image 11 Home, tasks are not ported to Acronis True Image Home 2009. Also, it will not be possible to edit tasks created with Acronis True Image 11 home, and previously created scheduled tasks must be recreated following the upgrade.
• When updating from ATIH 11 with activated Acronis True Image Startup Recovery Manager (ASRM) to Acronis True Image Home 2009, the ASRM operates in trial mode by default. The user will not be able to create backups, only restore backups. In order to create backups from the ASRM, first deactivate the ASRM by going to Tools->Activate Startup Recovery Manager->Deactivate and then re-activate the ASRM by going to Tools->Activate Startup Recovery Manager->Activate
Log in to your account to collect the update. 
»www.acronis.com/homecomputing/su···pdates/# | |
|
 
howie
Premium,MVM
join:2003-04-08
Little Falls, NJ
| Re: Acronis TI Build 9796 Released 6-24 Thanks! I was still running 9788.
I use ShadowProtect and TI 2009 now (redundancy is good). | |
|
 |
WFO
Premium
join:2001-08-27
San Ramon, CA | Re: Acronis TI Build 9796 Released 6-24 I've been using Shadow Protect too. I'll give this a spin on one of my Win 7 rigs. | |
|
| |
howie
Premium,MVM
join:2003-04-08
Little Falls, NJ
| Re: Acronis TI Build 9796 Released 6-24 said by WFO  :I've been using Shadow Protect too. I'll give this a spin on one of my Win 7 rigs. They seem pretty equal speed-wise when imaging, although I find a full restore for me is about 1 to 2 minutes faster with SP. | |
|
Keizer
I'M Your Huckleberry
Premium,MVM
join:2003-01-20 | Downloading now.....thanks!! | |
|
Dustyn
Premium
join:2003-02-26
Ontario, CAN | Yeah it says it's version #9796, but when you download the file and hover over file, it says #9791. Are you sure you guys got version #9796? | |
|
| 
redxii
too big to fail
Premium,Mod
join:2001-02-26
Texas | Re: Acronis TI Build 9796 Released 6-24 They say it's 9796 but it's really 9791. | |
|
| |
Dustyn
Premium
join:2003-02-26
Ontario, CAN
4 edits | Re: Acronis TI Build 9796 Released 6-24 So is 9796 a NEW build?
Or is 9791 the new build?
I'm just wondering if they have failed to update the links to 9796 as it's misslabeled. I have been live chatting with a REP at ATI and he needs more info on my end as he tried sending me 9796 but it was 9791 again.
EDIT: Found out it's a GUI issue. It's build #9791. It is either a GUI mistake or a mislabeled version number. Either way there is NO build #9796.
»www.wilderssecurity.com/showthre···=1491952 | |
|
| | |
howie
Premium,MVM
join:2003-04-08
Little Falls, NJ
| Re: Acronis TI Build 9796 Released 6-24 Right you are, Dustyn! | |
|
| | | | 
takeahike
join:2005-01-07
Woodland Hills, CA | Re: Acronis TI Build 9796 Released 6-24 Same here. oh well. | |
|
|
|
Dustyn
Premium
join:2003-02-26
Ontario, CAN | Re: Acronis TI Build 9796 Released 6-24 I'm not going to install this botched up build.. even if they do re-release it later. Think I'll stick with the previous build for a while. | |
|
Fedorov
Premium
join:2002-09-11
| It's almost impossible to trust this company these days - I'm sticking with my current TI 2009 build, it works on my machines.
Fills you with ZERO confidence that in the past few weeks all I've seen is different build numbers appear/disappear and then mismatches of versions etc..... | |
|
| 
gate1975mlm
Premium
join:2001-09-30
Philadelphia, PA
| Re: Acronis TI Build 9796 Released 6-24 said by Fedorov :It's almost impossible to trust this company these days - I'm sticking with my current TI 2009 build, it works on my machines. Fills you with ZERO confidence that in the past few weeks all I've seen is different build numbers appear/disappear and then mismatches of versions etc..... Im a fan of True Image but I have to agree.
What the heck is Acronis programmers upto? | |
|
| | |
| | |
howie
Premium,MVM
join:2003-04-08
Little Falls, NJ
| Re: Acronis TI Build 9796 Released 6-24 said by DaHen :I have jumped the fence and gone with ShadowProtect. Seems that I couldn't mount any of my backups with TI version 11. Even going back to version 9 b2337. Contacted support. They tried but after it was escalated to Tier 2, I haven't heard from them. (Perhaps that should have been Tear 2. lol)  Yeah, SP is a great imaging program. I'm using both SP 3.3 and TI 2009. One can never have too many backups!  | |
|
| | | |
WFO
Premium
join:2001-08-27
San Ramon, CA
| Re: Acronis TI Build 9796 Released 6-24 You've got that right!!! I've got 9791 and 9796 downloaded. I'll probably hold off another week and continue watching the forum at Wilders before installing. 
--
Coolermaster HAF
I-7 920
12GB G.Skill DDR3 1600
3 X60GB OCZ SSDs Raid 0
2 X 500GB Sata IIs Raid 0 storage
Asus P6T
9800GX2
Windows 7 x64 | |
|
|
|
howie
Premium,MVM
join:2003-04-08
Little Falls, NJ | In case anyone's interested, here is the hash info for the "fixed" build 9796 install file:
CRC32: 5D63AA6D
MD5: 0F7B0C028FCC684E836094D743FCF6EB
SHA-1: 1E1736465740E696C78AAED98B9301C63A3063A5 | |
|
Dustyn
Premium
join:2003-02-26
Ontario, CAN | Looks like they finally got it fixed. (third time around)
May give it a shot... though I'm hesitant. | |
|
| 
splashd
@comcast.net | Re: Acronis TI Build 9796 Released 6-24 I tried to install, but I get a Windows crash dialog on XP just after double-clicking the install file I downloaded (I redownloaded-- same result). I'll revert to TI version 10 for now...This is not what I expected for my $25 upgrade... | |
|
| |
howie
Premium,MVM
join:2003-04-08
Little Falls, NJ
| Re: Acronis TI Build 9796 Released 6-24 said by splashd :
I tried to install, but I get a Windows crash dialog on XP just after double-clicking the install file I downloaded (I redownloaded-- same result). I'll revert to TI version 10 for now...This is not what I expected for my $25 upgrade...
Did you check the hash(es) of the setup file you downloaded? If it matches what I posted above, you should be fine, as the updated installer should not crash.
I'll re-post them:
CRC32: 5D63AA6D
MD5: 0F7B0C028FCC684E836094D743FCF6EB
SHA-1: 1E1736465740E696C78AAED98B9301C63A3063A5 | |
|
| | |
takeahike
join:2005-01-07
Woodland Hills, CA
1 edit | Re: Acronis TI Build 9796 Released 6-24 Well, looks ok. Do I go so far as to make my boot disk of this version? | |
|
Dustyn
Premium
join:2003-02-26
Ontario, CAN | For myself, #9796 installed correctly without any install issues under XP64. | |
|
|
|
|
I see it's a known issue... I hope they fix it ASAP.
·
·
The check program indicated I had a valid SN (which I paid for and is registered with them) and asked me to email the Acronis registry entries and msinfo which I did. I also restored the PC from a backup using TI2009 under Bartpe and reinstalled the prior version that accepted my paid for SN. After two days without a reply to my email I checked the Acronis site and they had removed the update and replaced it with the older version that still works for me.