takeahike
join:2005-01-07
Woodland Hills, CA
1 edit | reply to howie
Re: Acronis TI Build 9796 Released 6-24
Well, looks ok. Do I go so far as to make my boot disk of this version? |
|
howie
Premium,MVM
join:2003-04-08
Little Falls, NJ
| reply to splashd
said by splashd :
I tried to install, but I get a Windows crash dialog on XP just after double-clicking the install file I downloaded (I redownloaded-- same result). I'll revert to TI version 10 for now...This is not what I expected for my $25 upgrade...
Did you check the hash(es) of the setup file you downloaded? If it matches what I posted above, you should be fine, as the updated installer should not crash.
I'll re-post them:
CRC32: 5D63AA6D
MD5: 0F7B0C028FCC684E836094D743FCF6EB
SHA-1: 1E1736465740E696C78AAED98B9301C63A3063A5 |
|
Dustyn
Premium
join:2003-02-26
Ontario, CAN | reply to WFO
For myself, #9796 installed correctly without any install issues under XP64. |
|
splashd
@comcast.net | reply to Dustyn
I tried to install, but I get a Windows crash dialog on XP just after double-clicking the install file I downloaded (I redownloaded-- same result). I'll revert to TI version 10 for now...This is not what I expected for my $25 upgrade... |
|
Dustyn
Premium
join:2003-02-26
Ontario, CAN | reply to WFO
Looks like they finally got it fixed. (third time around)
May give it a shot... though I'm hesitant. |
|
howie
Premium,MVM
join:2003-04-08
Little Falls, NJ | reply to WFO
In case anyone's interested, here is the hash info for the "fixed" build 9796 install file:
CRC32: 5D63AA6D
MD5: 0F7B0C028FCC684E836094D743FCF6EB
SHA-1: 1E1736465740E696C78AAED98B9301C63A3063A5 |
|
janderso1
Jim
Premium,MVM
join:2000-04-15
Saint Petersburg, FL
| reply to WFO
The last time I tried to update TI 2009 it told me my SN was invalid and gave me a URL to check it and if necessary get a replacement.  The check program indicated I had a valid SN (which I paid for and is registered with them) and asked me to email the Acronis registry entries and msinfo which I did. I also restored the PC from a backup using TI2009 under Bartpe and reinstalled the prior version that accepted my paid for SN. After two days without a reply to my email I checked the Acronis site and they had removed the update and replaced it with the older version that still works for me.
My educated guess is that they added a check for some pirated SNs and the check isn’t very accurate.
I am going to wait awhile for the dust to settle before I try this upgrade and I will have a current backup before I try it.
--
Jim Anderson |
|
WFO
Premium
join:2001-08-27
San Ramon, CA
| reply to howie
You've got that right!!!  I've got 9791 and 9796 downloaded. I'll probably hold off another week and continue watching the forum at Wilders before installing. 
--
Coolermaster HAF
I-7 920
12GB G.Skill DDR3 1600
3 X60GB OCZ SSDs Raid 0
2 X 500GB Sata IIs Raid 0 storage
Asus P6T
9800GX2
Windows 7 x64 |
|
howie
Premium,MVM
join:2003-04-08
Little Falls, NJ
| reply to DaHen
said by DaHen  :I have jumped the fence and gone with ShadowProtect. Seems that I couldn't mount any of my backups with TI version 11. Even going back to version 9 b2337. Contacted support. They tried but after it was escalated to Tier 2, I haven't heard from them. (Perhaps that should have been Tear 2. lol)  Yeah, SP is a great imaging program. I'm using both SP 3.3 and TI 2009. One can never have too many backups! |
|
DaHen
Premium
join:2002-11-08
Brockton, MA
 ·Verizon Online DSL
 ·Comcast
| reply to gate1975mlm
I have jumped the fence and gone with ShadowProtect.
Seems that I couldn't mount any of my backups with TI version 11. Even going back to version 9 b2337. Contacted support. They tried but after it was escalated to Tier 2, I haven't heard from them. (Perhaps that should have been Tear 2. lol)
|
|
howie
Premium,MVM
join:2003-04-08
Little Falls, NJ
1 edit | reply to WFO
They got it right now.... or have they?
[EDIT] FWIW, I just did a full backup and restore (using the new 9796 boot media). No issues to report.  |
|
gate1975mlm
Premium
join:2001-09-30
Philadelphia, PA
| reply to Fedorov
said by Fedorov :It's almost impossible to trust this company these days - I'm sticking with my current TI 2009 build, it works on my machines. Fills you with ZERO confidence that in the past few weeks all I've seen is different build numbers appear/disappear and then mismatches of versions etc..... Im a fan of True Image but I have to agree.
What the heck is Acronis programmers upto? |
|
Fedorov
Premium
join:2002-09-11
| reply to WFO
It's almost impossible to trust this company these days - I'm sticking with my current TI 2009 build, it works on my machines.
Fills you with ZERO confidence that in the past few weeks all I've seen is different build numbers appear/disappear and then mismatches of versions etc..... |
|
Dustyn
Premium
join:2003-02-26
Ontario, CAN | reply to howie
I'm not going to install this botched up build.. even if they do re-release it later. Think I'll stick with the previous build for a while. |
|
howie
Premium,MVM
join:2003-04-08
Little Falls, NJ
1 edit | reply to WFO
9796 is up but it fails (crashes) as soon as you run setup...  I see it's a known issue... I hope they fix it ASAP.
[EDIT] Link to issue over at Wilders:
»www.wilderssecurity.com/showthre···t=246541 |
|
takeahike
join:2005-01-07
Woodland Hills, CA | reply to howie
Same here. oh well. |
|
howie
Premium,MVM
join:2003-04-08
Little Falls, NJ
| reply to Dustyn
Right you are, Dustyn! |
|
Dustyn
Premium
join:2003-02-26
Ontario, CAN
4 edits | reply to redxii
So is 9796 a NEW build?
Or is 9791 the new build?
I'm just wondering if they have failed to update the links to 9796 as it's misslabeled. I have been live chatting with a REP at ATI and he needs more info on my end as he tried sending me 9796 but it was 9791 again.
EDIT: Found out it's a GUI issue. It's build #9791. It is either a GUI mistake or a mislabeled version number. Either way there is NO build #9796.
»www.wilderssecurity.com/showthre···=1491952 |
|
redxii
too big to fail
Premium,Mod
join:2001-02-26
Texas | reply to Dustyn
They say it's 9796 but it's really 9791. |
|
Dustyn
Premium
join:2003-02-26
Ontario, CAN | reply to WFO
Yeah it says it's version #9796, but when you download the file and hover over file, it says #9791. Are you sure you guys got version #9796? |
|
