DesdinovaPremium
join:2003-01-26
Gaithersburg, MD | So your argument is everyone who sees their marketing campaign will without reserve and exception buy a Glock specifically to kill cops? And further, they should not be charged because it's Glock's fault? You're saying that it if they didn't advertise it that way, no one would ever think of using it to that end? That no one has any motivation to use or abuse an item outside of what a marketing campaign orders?
Sorry, I don't agree. I don't care if Glock advertises that their guns will vaporize nuns and puppies with a single round to the back of the head, YOU'RE still the one who decides to aim at them and pull the trigger. |
