redpanther
join:2001-01-07
Hot Springs National Park, AR | reply to dellsweig
Re: WRT160NL LinuxPowered is here. Can a WRT610NL be far behind?
DD-WRT won't work (yet) on the 160NL since it is Atheros based will it? |
|
dellsweig
Extreme Aerobatics
Premium,MVM
join:2003-12-10
Campbell Hall, NY
 ·Time Warner VOIP
·Vonage
 ·RoadRunner Cable
| said by redpanther  :DD-WRT won't work (yet) on the 160NL since it is Atheros based will it? What makes you think its Atheros based?? |
|
Thane_Bitter
join:2005-01-20
London, ON
 ·Bell Sympatico
| said by dellsweig :What makes you think its Atheros based?? Because 'Atheros' is stamped all over the IC's 
»https://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/oet/forms···_pdf=pdf
»https://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/repo···160NL%27
(Caution: something is wrong with the FCC website certificate)
DD-WRT does support some Atheros chipsets (i.e. Accton's La Fonera line-up), though I can't think of a Linksys device that has used Atheros before. The OpenWRT people seem to be salivating over the design, electronic design that is (physically it has all the appeal of a soap dish) so if can be done they will likely be the first to port a working firmware. |
|
redpanther
join:2001-01-07
Hot Springs National Park, AR | reply to dellsweig
»www.smallnetbuilder.com/content/···0839/96/ |
|
PrntRhd
join:2004-11-03
Fairfield, CA | reply to dellsweig
Yes it is Atheros based if this is to be believed:
»www.smallnetbuilder.com/content/···0839/96/ |
|
NetFixer
Freedom is NOT Free
Premium
join:2004-06-24
Murfreesboro, TN
·Vonage
·AT&T Southeast
 ·Cingular Wireless
·AT&T CallVantage
| reply to Thane_Bitter
Actually nothing is wrong with the SSL certificate, you just need to use the correct hostname in the URLs:
»https://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/prod/oet/forms···_pdf=pdf
»https://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/repo···160NL%27
--
A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
»portscan.dcs-net.net
»nature-pics.com |
|
