<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title> New HD Channels? in Verizon FIOS TV</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r22623555</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 20:23:51 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 20:23:51 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22728144</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/548382"><b>JeepMatt</b></A> : Nice to see competition heating up...<br><br>Comcast in my area will be moving 41 analogs to digital in the next two months...granted, for them that means a possible 123 HD channels with that awful 3:1 QAM ratio they use.... ;) ;)<br><br>Hopefully that rumor of a "nice chunk of new HD's" in Q4 comes true for us...<br><small>--<br>"ONE team - ONE city - ONE dream!!"</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22728144</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 06:27:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22683411</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/244683"><b>harrylime</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  VZ Mark <A HREF="/useremail/u/1653166"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Some of these classic movies are in black and white... </div>The masters for the most important movies in the Warner Bros. library -- ADV. OF ROBIN HOOD, CASABLANCA, etc -- are scanned from film at 4K resolution. (So is drek like CATWOMAN, but that's beside the point.) That's about six times as many pixels as your HDTV set.  :o<br><br>(4096&times;3072 pixels compared to 1920x1080.) <br><br>I think TCM HD could max out your screen all right, even in black and white. The main question is how much high-frequency detail you lose to the MPEG-2 compression.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22683411</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 23:09:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22672835</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1262578"><b>zer0future</b></A> : From what I've seen Nick HD doesn't really have many HD programs yet, perhaps they will start animating some of their cartoons in HD now that they have a HD channel. I guess they could try and get HD broadcasting rights on the shows they have on nick at night (if available). From what little I've seen there isn't a noticeable difference between regular Nick and NickHD. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22672835</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 11:23:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22672118</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1552888"><b>Greg2600</b></A> : What's very ironic is that Verizon's SD quality on a channel such as TCM is so good, that TCM HD (upconverted) looks about the same on an HDTV.  Whereas someone like Comcast almost has to have TCM HD for HDTV's because their SD quality is so horrible.  So in line with what VZ Mark is saying, Verizon doesn't really need to add the HD version, because the SD is just as good.  But it makes Verizon look weaker because they don't have the HD version.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22672118</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 09:36:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22672114</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/275993"><b>darcilicious</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  matcarl <A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Spongebob isn't in 16:9 though, but I notice that for the HD channels that show 4:3 content, the screen does get filled up slightly more than the SD version, maybe 1 inch on each side.<br> </div>Interesting -- I've never seen that myself. My TV is typically set at 1:1 mode and my 6200 is set with SD override off...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22672114</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 09:35:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22671936</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><b>matcarl</b></A> : Spongebob isn't in 16:9 though, but I notice that for the HD channels that show 4:3 content, the screen does get filled up slightly more than the SD version, maybe 1 inch on each side.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22671936</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 08:58:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22671860</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1653166"><b>VZ Mark</b></A> : I am aware of the ability for old movies to be digitized and the potential for them to be aired in high resolution. What I don't think will happen for quite sometime is that the extensive library of classic movies to be upconverted for HD channels. Maybe it's a case of 'build it and they will come' and by adding the channels it will push the movie companies, but some of these classic movies are in black and white...<br><br>And I was watching Spongebob in HD, but with my kids. That cartoon is pretty funny even for adults at times!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22671860</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 08:42:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22671093</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1656939"><b>URFloorMatt</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  VZ Mark <A HREF="/useremail/u/1653166"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>I'm curious about the Cartoon Network since Nick HD, which VZ recently added, didn't seem to be worth it? Don't know much about cartoon production but are HD cartoons really worth the BW? My kid was thrilled to see the "HD" in the logo but I didn't see a major difference...anyone agree/disagree? <br> </div>I think Nick HD has a fair amount of HD during the daytime, and I have seen at least one teen sitcom airing during the day that's also HD.  The problem is Nick at Nite covers 8pm to some early hour and there's not yet any HD during that time, though George Lopez repeats could be.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22671093</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 00:21:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22671041</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  VZ Mark <A HREF="/useremail/u/1653166"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Subjective indeed! For example munson15 wants TCM in HD and I don't blame him. But in reality Turner CLASSIC Movies are all shot prior to HD technology and quality would not be the same as Discovery HD Theatre just for one example. Junk for one could be gold to another but to me the dot tv's are just plain crap...good discussion...<br> </div>No, this is wrong.  Assuming that HD Theater shoots most of its footage on digital video rather than film, it's maximum resolution is 1080p.  Anything that TCM airs that was shot on 32 mm film has much, much higher potential resolution.<br><br>Now, it's been stated at AVS that TCM will be upconverting for the next year, so that might cut against adding it in the short term.  But given how these carriage agreements generally work, adding TCM, HLN, TruTV, and Cartoon Network would seem well worth the effort.  These are four channels that, until recently, were standard fare for analog distribution by cable providers.  They all have high exposure, particularly Cartoon Network.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22671041</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 00:14:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22668823</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/275993"><b>darcilicious</b></A> : Well, if you're watching SpongeBob then yeah, you're probably watching too much TV ;-)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22668823</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 16:32:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22668799</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1653166"><b>VZ Mark</b></A> : Spongebob did look better in HD, just not sure it was as good as watching sports in SD and then switching to the HD feed of the same game and getting that 'WOW!' factor. Maybe I just watch too much damn TV???]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22668799</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 16:30:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22668737</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/275993"><b>darcilicious</b></A> : I have noticed that programs in SD that are broadcast on HD channels almost always look better than they do on their original SD channels. <br><br>(At least if they don't do stretch and the like ;-) )]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22668737</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 16:23:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22668697</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1653166"><b>VZ Mark</b></A> : Thanks for the feedback, besides this show are there any others that would also be noticeable? Part of the discussion on this thread is 'part-time' HD on full time HD channels. Seems to me like VZ is adding some of these HD channels faster than the providers can add HD content? ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22668697</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 16:18:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22668265</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1509282"><b>Baff</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  VZ Mark <A HREF="/useremail/u/1653166"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>I'm curious about the Cartoon Network since Nick HD, which VZ recently added, didn't seem to be worth it? Don't know much about cartoon production but are HD cartoons really worth the BW? My kid was thrilled to see the "HD" in the logo but I didn't see a major difference...anyone agree/disagree? <br> </div>I want CN for Star Wars: The Clone Wars.  Very noticeable difference to me.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22668265</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 15:02:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22667744</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  lcjawhit <A HREF="/useremail/u/1394056"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br><div class="bquote">Is SYFY new?  I don't remember seeing it...<br> </div>Sci-Fi Channel is being renamed (stupidly) to SyFy.  Thank the boobs at NBC.<br> </div>That's just genius! i used to check my listings and ask "What's this Skiffy (SciFi) channel about?" Now I can phonetically figure it out!  :uhh:]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22667744</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 13:46:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22667754</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><b>matcarl</b></A> : They may have some shows that are in HD, better to have it than not, I say!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22667754</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 13:44:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22667734</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1653166"><b>VZ Mark</b></A> : I'm curious about the Cartoon Network since Nick HD, which VZ recently added, didn't seem to be worth it? Don't know much about cartoon production but are HD cartoons really worth the BW? My kid was thrilled to see the "HD" in the logo but I didn't see a major difference...anyone agree/disagree? ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22667734</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 13:42:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22667649</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1552888"><b>Greg2600</b></A> : Anything shot on 35mm or 70mm film, which includes I think almost all films anyone would ever want to watch, contain a resolution higher than 1080p.  So any of those could be converted to HD fairly easily.  I have no idea, but my guess is that Turner's Classics have not been converted to HD from their original stock.  TCM does show some newer films, but odds are they are still just SD copies.  <br><br>The next ones Verizon should go after are BBC, MSNBC, Comcast's, TCM, and Cartoon Network.  The Cablevision/Rainbow networks should be added, but we all know the story there.<br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  lcjawhit <A HREF="/useremail/u/1394056"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Is SYFY new?  I don't remember seeing it...<br> </div>Sci-Fi Channel is being renamed (stupidly) to SyFy.  Thank the boobs at NBC.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22667649</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 13:29:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22667641</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/275993"><b>darcilicious</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  matcarl <A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Having everything would solve the problem  :p<br> </div>Agreed! (per my previous post ;-) )]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22667641</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 13:26:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22667635</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/275993"><b>darcilicious</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by RBost :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  darcilicious <A HREF="/useremail/u/275993"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  VZ Mark <A HREF="/useremail/u/1653166"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>   :</small><br><br>I think VZ does need to stress quality over quantity now that the 100HD barrier has been broken...<br> </div>And who decides what is "quality"? Very subject topic! Frankly, if a channel is in HD and won't substantially raise the cost to customers then Vz should carry it :p <br> </div>I disagree. Junk is junk,whether it is in HD or not.To me, quality far exceeds quantity.<br> </div>Your "junk" could very well be my treasure. I could care less about most sports in HD, most news in HD, etc, etc.  And I'm sure there are HD channels that I would never want to go without that you never watch. So between the two of us, who should be the judge of "quality"? I vote for me ;-)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22667635</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 13:26:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22667631</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1394056"><b>lcjawhit</b></A> : Is SYFY new?  I don't remember seeing it...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22667631</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 13:25:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22667606</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1496823"><b>FIOSHD</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  VZ Mark <A HREF="/useremail/u/1653166"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Subjective indeed! For example munson15 wants TCM in HD and I don't blame him. But in reality Turner CLASSIC Movies are all shot prior to HD technology and quality would not be the same as Discovery HD Theatre just for one example. Junk for one could be gold to another but to me the dot tv's are just plain crap...good discussion...<br> </div>I'm not so sure of this.  It all depends on the quality of the transfer.  There is nothing inherent in film that makes it worse than something shot with an HD camera.....at least that is my understanding.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22667606</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 13:21:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22667581</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><b>matcarl</b></A> : Having everything would solve the problem  :p]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22667581</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 13:18:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22667370</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1653166"><b>VZ Mark</b></A> : Subjective indeed! For example munson15 wants TCM in HD and I don't blame him. But in reality Turner CLASSIC Movies are all shot prior to HD technology and quality would not be the same as Discovery HD Theatre just for one example. Junk for one could be gold to another but to me the dot tv's are just plain crap...good discussion...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22667370</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 12:49:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22667209</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/909885"><b>eric87m</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  Greg2600 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1552888"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>The .TV channels were actually a negative.  I wish they just plain got rid of them.<br> </div> agreed]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22667209</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 12:29:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22667004</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  darcilicious <A HREF="/useremail/u/275993"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  VZ Mark <A HREF="/useremail/u/1653166"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br>I think VZ does need to stress quality over quantity now that the 100HD barrier has been broken...<br> </div>And who decides what is "quality"? Very subject topic! Frankly, if a channel is in HD and won't substantially raise the cost to customers then Vz should carry it :p <br> </div>I disagree. Junk is junk,whether it is in HD or not.To me, quality far exceeds quantity.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22667004</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 12:13:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22666841</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/275993"><b>darcilicious</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  VZ Mark <A HREF="/useremail/u/1653166"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>I think VZ does need to stress quality over quantity now that the 100HD barrier has been broken...<br> </div>And who decides what is "quality"? Very subject topic! Frankly, if a channel is in HD and won't substantially raise the cost to customers then Vz should carry it :p ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22666841</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 11:39:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22666796</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1653166"><b>VZ Mark</b></A> : I agree that the dot tv's and even the Viacom HD's have minimal HD content. The dot TV's will be used in a trial for viewing on handsets. I don't watch these at home on my 62" DLP, not sure why I would watch them on my cell??? Spike HD is the best of the Viacom Channels, especially the new Jesse James show. I think VZ does need to stress quality over quantity now that the 100HD barrier has been broken...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22666796</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 11:33:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22664558</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1552888"><b>Greg2600</b></A> : The .TV channels were actually a negative.  I wish they just plain got rid of them.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22664558</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 22:40:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22664413</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/238234"><b>kba829</b></A> : Now that they've added Comedy Central, if they add BBC in HD, I could pretty much give up SD channels altogether. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22664413</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 22:15:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22663677</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  JeepMatt <A HREF="/useremail/u/548382"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  munson15 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1530721"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Now it's Cablevision that is adding HD channels left and right & it's Verizon that's seemingly dead in the water like some rat-gnawed corpse when it comes to adding new channels. Go figure.<br> </div>Huh? They just added 12 HD channels in the past 2 months! <br> </div>At least 7 of these channels are pure fluff. The 6 .crap channels do not deserve to be on any line-up, and YES is merely a 24 hour informercial about the Yankees with about half of its programming in SD. Vz. needs to shine now that some of the better channels are becoming available in HD.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22663677</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 20:20:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22663630</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  JeepMatt <A HREF="/useremail/u/548382"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  munson15 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1530721"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Now it's Cablevision that is adding HD channels left and right & it's Verizon that's seemingly dead in the water like some rat-gnawed corpse when it comes to adding new channels. Go figure.<br> </div>Huh? They just added 12 HD channels in the past 2 months! <br> </div>You can tell us that until you're blue in the face, but no one in the world considers the .TV channels real HD additions.<br><br>Verizon added six channels in the last two months, and destroyed the bandwidth for six other future channels.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22663630</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 20:05:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22663180</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1530721"><b>munson15</b></A> : That's right, they added Recipe TV at some point, didn't they? How silly of me to overlook that monumental achievement in the history of HD TV.  <br><br>The point I was trying to make is that if Cablevision (a company that until very recently has had a history of only adding new channels to their lineup slowly) can add new premium HD channels as they become available, Verizon should be able to as well. <br><br>EDIT:<br><br>Let me be perfectly clear here so there are no misunderstands. I'm bitter specifically about Cablevision carrying TCM HD, a channel I'd very much like to see in the FIOS HD lineup. I was a Cablevision customer for 20 years, and it was like trying to pull teeth from a crocodile in heat to get them to add new channels to their lineup, no matter how popular those channels were on other services. Now that they've got some competition, they're adding new channels like there's no tomorrow.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22663180</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 18:44:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22663077</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/548382"><b>JeepMatt</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  munson15 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1530721"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Now it's Cablevision that is adding HD channels left and right & it's Verizon that's seemingly dead in the water like some rat-gnawed corpse when it comes to adding new channels. Go figure.<br> </div>Huh? They just added 12 HD channels in the past 2 months! <br><small>--<br>"ONE team - ONE city - ONE dream!!"</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22663077</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 18:26:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22663046</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1530721"><b>munson15</b></A> : What sickens me is that Cablevision is actually starting to carry some cool HD channels, like TCM HD, that I wish were available on FIOS. When I had CV, they were notoriously slow in adding any new channels, either in SD or HD. On those rare occasions when they did add new channels, along with the inevitable rate increase, they always acted like they were doing their customers the mother of all favors for doing so. <br><br>Now it's Cablevision that is adding HD channels left and right & it's Verizon that's seemingly dead in the water like some rat-gnawed corpse when it comes to adding new channels. Go figure.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22663046</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 18:22:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22661408</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : The new Comcast lineup looks very competitive but remember, we are still the only one that has the 6 .crap channels.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22661408</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 13:47:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22661085</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1592825"><b>armstrda</b></A> : Man that new Portland area HD lineup isn't bad for Comcast.  Should make the transition easier if Frontier decides to screw us when the switch takes place.  Not looking forward to the PQ though.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22661085</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 12:47:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22660722</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1552888"><b>Greg2600</b></A> : MSNBC, Turner Classic Movies, TruTV, BET, not to mention that region already has Fuse, G4, Cartoon Network, We, IFC in HD.  Portland, though, for those who don't know, has been light years ahead of the rest of the country (except Boston) for Comcast.  <br><br>Hopefully Verizon adds a half dozen more HD channels this fall.  At some point though, the number of channels nor internet speed are not going to make a competitive difference, and the providers will have to sell based on other measures.  Verizon said recently that they are no longer going to compete on price, well, umm, that might make its way back into the equation.  And price wars, of course, are usually very ugly.  <br><br>If I were Verizon, I would really be focusing on getting more of the Web into the TV/STB.  That means web-video sites like You Tube, Hulu, Fancast and AOL, and not the worthless sites I've read they are going to offer.  I want to see old episodes of Thundercats or Welcome Back Kotter, not videos of some idiot skateboarding off a trash dumpster.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22660722</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 11:43:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22660020</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/548382"><b>JeepMatt</b></A> : Check out this thread..<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="/forum/r22653935-HD-Portland-OR-new-HD-channels-effective-Sept-1st">[HD] Portland, OR new HD channels effective Sept 1st.</A><br><br>Comcast in the OR / WA area will be really competitive come 9/1...included in their lineup are a number of the ones Max1 listed earlier...<br><br>As the Beastie's used to say...no sleep til' Brooklyn!  :p<br><small>--<br>"ONE team - ONE city - ONE dream!!"</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22660020</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 09:20:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22649959</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1653166"><b>VZ Mark</b></A> : Exactly! I'm hoping that Rainbow is spunoff from Cablevision but I'm not holding my breath for that either. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22649959</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 13:59:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22643606</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Does anyone know if Chiller HD is available yet?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22643606</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 08:00:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22640874</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1478162"><b>MeatChicken</b></A> :  The Comcasts, Turners, & BBC Am-HD, are the "important ones" for me... E! , Cartoon, TCM...<br> ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22640874</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 16:57:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22640854</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/113657"><b>almahix</b></A> : There aren't any among those that I miss having in HD. Once everything is broadcast in native HD it would be good I suppose, but most channels just stretch or warp SD to fill the screen and it looks awful. I'll watch the SD channels rather than stretched/warped SD on HD channels.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22640854</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 16:52:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22640739</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1531447"><b>Roche1972</b></A> : MeatChicken, the Rainbow Media HD channels are owned by Cablevision along with MSG HD and MSG+ HD. Cablevision hates Verizon so don't look for those HD channels anytime soon.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22640739</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 16:27:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22639989</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/548382"><b>JeepMatt</b></A> : Meat-<br>I'm interpreting it that we have no chance of seeing them since they're from Rainbow.<br><small>--<br>"ONE team - ONE city - ONE dream!!"</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22639989</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 14:06:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22639963</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1478162"><b>MeatChicken</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  VZ Mark <A HREF="/useremail/u/1653166"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>You can scratch off the Rainbow Media HD's (4-7)...<br> </div> What does that mean?<br> We are getting others?<br> ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22639963</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 14:01:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22639689</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1653166"><b>VZ Mark</b></A> : You can scratch off the Rainbow Media HD's (4-7)...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22639689</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 13:12:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22636274</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/896908"><b>JTBurn</b></A> : Thanks Max 1.  Not much there I care about. Except the "Coming Soon to FIOS" stuff, and maybe AMC and E!.  20-22 sounds good to me.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22636274</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 18:33:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22635290</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1281783"><b>timrek</b></A> : Add NASA HD (part time for now)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22635290</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 15:15:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22635226</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1105113"><b>aaronwt</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  Max1 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1517020"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Even though I don't want to sound like I'm complaining, because Fios is after all the leader in total number of HD channels available, they are missing quite a few HD channels.  The total number of available HD channels not carried by Fios, by my estimation, is 24 channels.  Here is the list:<br>Viacom<br>1&#9;BET HD<br>2&#9;BET J HD<br>3&#9;LOGO HD<br>Rainbow Media<br>4&#9;AMC HD<br>5&#9;IFC HD<br>6&#9;WE TV HD<br>7&#9;Fuse HD<br>Turner<br>8&#9;Cartoon Network HD<br>9&#9;TCM HD<br>10&#9;Tru TV HD<br>Fox<br>11&#9;Fuel HD<br>Independent<br>12&#9;Jewelry TV HD<br>13&#9;Fashion TV HD<br>14&#9;TV One HD<br>Comcast<br>15&#9;E! Entertainment HD<br>16&#9;G4 HD <br>17&#9;Style HD<br>NBC Universal <br>18&#9;MSNBC HD<br>Coming Soon to Fios&#9;<br>19&#9;Crime & Investigation HD<br>20&#9;CBS College Sports HD<br>21&#9;NBA TV HD<br>22&#9;Team HD (HD channel for NBA League Pass)<br>23&#9;RFD TV HD<br>24&#9;TBN HD<br>I wouldn't mind having the Turner & Comcast HD Channels.<br> </div>Well I guess that explains why I could't find BET-HD the other day when my girlfriend wanted me to record the BET awards show for her.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22635226</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 15:04:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22635108</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1580560"><b>coolguy23</b></A> : Yes NBA TV does carry a lot of live games. They have a lot of games throughout the week.  On Tuesdays, its fan night, where the fans get to pick which game they want to see.  Also, a lot of the first round NBA playoff games were only on NBA TV.  Plus its cool to have detailed highlights of all the NBA games at night (kind of like sportscenter but with just NBA highlights).]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22635108</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 14:45:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22635073</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1653166"><b>VZ Mark</b></A> : Matt,<br><br>I don't see it on the radar for now but tipoff is a ways off. Do you know if NBA TV will carry live games like NFL Network? Ask me again as season draws nearer and I will have a better idea...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22635073</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 14:37:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22635002</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1478162"><b>MeatChicken</b></A> :  In your list, My immediate choices would be  #'s 4 thru 10, 15 thru 19,  & the not listed BBC America-HD, launching on July 20. <br>I wouldn't mind any of the others, but not at the delay of, or instead of, these.<br>    ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22635002</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 14:24:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22634895</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1517020"><b>Max1</b></A> : Even though I don't want to sound like I'm complaining, because Fios is after all the leader in total number of HD channels available, they are missing quite a few HD channels.  The total number of available HD channels not carried by Fios, by my estimation, is 24 channels.  Here is the list:<br>Viacom<br>1&#9;BET HD<br>2&#9;BET J HD<br>3&#9;LOGO HD<br>Rainbow Media<br>4&#9;AMC HD<br>5&#9;IFC HD<br>6&#9;WE TV HD<br>7&#9;Fuse HD<br>Turner<br>8&#9;Cartoon Network HD<br>9&#9;TCM HD<br>10&#9;Tru TV HD<br>Fox<br>11&#9;Fuel HD<br>Independent<br>12&#9;Jewelry TV HD<br>13&#9;Fashion TV HD<br>14&#9;TV One HD<br>Comcast<br>15&#9;E! Entertainment HD<br>16&#9;G4 HD <br>17&#9;Style HD<br>NBC Universal <br>18&#9;MSNBC HD<br>Coming Soon to Fios&#9;<br>19&#9;Crime & Investigation HD<br>20&#9;CBS College Sports HD<br>21&#9;NBA TV HD<br>22&#9;Team HD (HD channel for NBA League Pass)<br>23&#9;RFD TV HD<br>24&#9;TBN HD<br>I wouldn't mind having the Turner & Comcast HD Channels.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22634895</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 14:06:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22634735</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/548382"><b>JeepMatt</b></A> : Mark-<br>Any guarantee we'll see NBA TV on 89/589 at the same time as the LP channels?<br><small>--<br>"ONE team - ONE city - ONE dream!!"</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22634735</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 13:38:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22634464</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1653166"><b>VZ Mark</b></A> : NBA LP (ten SD services) along with the one corresponding HD service will be in place in time for next season...In fact, Team 6-10 are currently in use for MLS coverage...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22634464</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 12:58:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22634436</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1653166"><b>VZ Mark</b></A> : InDemand has two HD services. Game HD (VZ VC#1474) is used for MLB/NHL coverage and Team HD is used for NBA/MLS coverage (will be on VZ VC#1489 for start of NBA season)... ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22634436</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 12:52:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22630324</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1558091"><b>SQUIDWARD360</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  kes601 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1452846"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  SQUIDWARD360 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1558091"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br>They aren't exactly full time stations when they rerun the same programming.  The demand on the part time programming is higher then these.<br> </div>Again, it's a moot point because InDemand doesn't even offer them as HD feeds.<br><br>BTW, I would be the first to subscribe if Extra Innings was in all HD, but I still think it would be a waste of QAM space :-)<br> </div>It's not entirely moot when Verizon can make their own deal like DTV.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22630324</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 19:02:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22629573</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/582815"><b>Vamp9190</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  JeepMatt <A HREF="/useremail/u/548382"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>R-<br><br>The only 1 I know of is NBA TV HD - which is to be on by the time next season begins.<br> </div>It would be nice, but I am not holding my breath on this one. Especially after the last 2 years of promises (and especially with them adding it to the guide as a cruel joke a few months ago).]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22629573</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 16:32:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22627210</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1478162"><b>MeatChicken</b></A> : As has been mentioned.. Wish list ..<br>BBC AmericaHD when it launches in July.<br> E!-HD, Style-HD, Cartoon-HD, MSNBC (SD or HD for my market!), TCM-HD, IFC-HD, G4-HD.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22627210</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 09:29:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22627171</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/481467"><b>somebodeez</b></A> : I'd love to have TCM HD!  :)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22627171</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 09:15:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22626969</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1452846"><b>kes601</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  SQUIDWARD360 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1558091"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>They aren't exactly full time stations when they rerun the same programming.  The demand on the part time programming is higher then these.<br> </div>Again, it's a moot point because InDemand doesn't even offer them as HD feeds.<br><br>BTW, I would be the first to subscribe if Extra Innings was in all HD, but I still think it would be a waste of QAM space :-)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22626969</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 07:48:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: MSNBC HD &#x26; NBATV</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22626956</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/712898"><b>robjlevin</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  Myron4 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1535670"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>.  When does NBA League Pass get taken out of the hands of iN Demand?<br> </div>Probably never. DTV and Dish negotiate directly with the leagues because of their national footprint. It would be a logistical nightmare for cable companies (and I include FiOS in this) to handle it all.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22626956</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 07:42:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>MSNBC HD &#x26; NBATV</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22626942</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1535670"><b>Myron4</b></A> : TWC in selected markets of course, which rarely seems to include North Texas.  Their unique offering here is CBS College Sports HD but you only get that with their $7+ sports tier.<br><br>NBA TV is my #1 FiOS request now, SD & HD.  Wasn't it actually in the channel lineup about 7 months ago for a couple of months...  When does NBA League Pass get taken out of the hands of iN Demand?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22626942</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 07:33:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22626929</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1426347"><b>Acerone</b></A> : MSNBC HD goes live on CableVision today. Time Warner in July. By the end of August, MSNBC HD will be available in 11 million homes. No mention of FIOS yet. Also BET HD went live on DirecTV]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22626929</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 07:25:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22626727</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1474562"><b>Mark F</b></A> : But, I was a fan of Charlie's Angels. <br>Mark F.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22626727</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 03:41:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22626313</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1469403"><b>afiggatt</b></A> :  Maybe Verizon will surprise us and add MSNBC HD when it officially launches tomorrow. But that is not likely. Of course, with the excessive coverage about you know who on the news channels, that may be a good thing.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22626313</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 23:52:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22626135</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/944374"><b>casey10s</b></A> : Tennis Channel HD is probably the channel I watch the most.  I could care less about the NBA Channel.  The same basically goes for the NFL Network.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22626135</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 22:55:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22625547</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1558091"><b>SQUIDWARD360</b></A> : They aren't exactly full time stations when they rerun the same programming.  The demand on the part time programming is higher then these.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22625547</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 20:44:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22625503</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1452846"><b>kes601</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  SQUIDWARD360 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1558091"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>It's only a waste of bandwidth since you don't want them. I'm sure 90% of the other people here would rather see those channels in HD then the .tv channels, Tennis HD, Mav Tv or YES.<br> </div>No, it is a waste of bandwidth to carry them in HD because they are part time stations that would require several QAMs.<br><br>And -- I completely agree with the stations you listed, I could care less about them as well, but at least they are full time stations (with the exception of YES, which I don't count since the point of the station is Yankees games which can't air outside of NY).]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22625503</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 20:36:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22625271</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  JeepMatt <A HREF="/useremail/u/548382"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>The only 1 I know of is NBA TV HD - which is to be on by the time next season begins.<br> </div>Please say they will have NBA League Pass as well  :)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22625271</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 19:40:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22625014</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1558091"><b>SQUIDWARD360</b></A> : It's only a waste of bandwidth since you don't want them. I'm sure 90% of the other people here would rather see those channels in HD then the .tv channels, Tennis HD, Mav Tv or YES.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22625014</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 18:32:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22624195</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1452846"><b>kes601</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  SQUIDWARD360 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1558091"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>At this point I'm only waiting for the Cartoon Network.  Verizon has provided everything but the NFL Ticket at this point. I would like to see the NBA and NHL packages in HD though.<br> </div>NFL Ticket is exclusive to DirecTV, the contract was just renewed.<br>NBA / NHL in HD to me would be a waste of bandwidth unless they could do these IP based.  But, considering InDemand does not carry all the games in HD anyway it is a moot point.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22624195</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 14:44:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22624114</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1558091"><b>SQUIDWARD360</b></A> : At this point I'm only waiting for the Cartoon Network.  Verizon has provided everything but the NFL Ticket at this point. I would like to see the NBA and NHL packages in HD though.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22624114</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 14:23:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22623771</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/548382"><b>JeepMatt</b></A> : R-<br><br>The only 1 I know of is NBA TV HD - which is to be on by the time next season begins.<br><br>CBS CS stated in their PR that VZ would carry the HD feed "sometime in 2009" - but I have not heard any whispers on that, nor on any of the other channels you listed.<br><small>--<br>"ONE team - ONE city - ONE dream!!"</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22623771</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 12:43:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title> New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22623555</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Has anyone heard if there will be anymore HD channels added this summer? MSNBC and BBC will be availablle as well as TCM. Is there a chance we may get any of these? I'm also hoping that CBS College Sports and NBA will be added soon.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22623555</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 11:41:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
