<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Re:  New HD Channels?&#x27; in forum &#x27;Verizon FIOS TV&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22623555</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 09:46:09 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 09:46:09 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22728144</link>
<description><![CDATA[JeepMatt posted : Nice to see competition heating up...<br><br>Comcast in my area will be moving 41 analogs to digital in the next two months...granted, for them that means a possible 123 HD channels with that awful 3:1 QAM ratio they use.... ;) ;)<br><br>Hopefully that rumor of a "nice chunk of new HD's" in Q4 comes true for us...<br><small>--<br>"ONE team - ONE city - ONE dream!!"</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22728144</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 06:27:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22683411</link>
<description><![CDATA[harrylime posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1653166" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1653166');">VZ Mark</a>:</small><br><br>Some of these classic movies are in black and white... </div>The masters for the most important movies in the Warner Bros. library -- ADV. OF ROBIN HOOD, CASABLANCA, etc -- are scanned from film at 4K resolution. (So is drek like CATWOMAN, but that's beside the point.) That's about six times as many pixels as your HDTV set.  :o<br><br>(4096&times;3072 pixels compared to 1920x1080.) <br><br>I think TCM HD could max out your screen all right, even in black and white. The main question is how much high-frequency detail you lose to the MPEG-2 compression.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22683411</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 23:09:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22672835</link>
<description><![CDATA[zer0future posted : From what I've seen Nick HD doesn't really have many HD programs yet, perhaps they will start animating some of their cartoons in HD now that they have a HD channel. I guess they could try and get HD broadcasting rights on the shows they have on nick at night (if available). From what little I've seen there isn't a noticeable difference between regular Nick and NickHD. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22672835</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 11:23:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22672118</link>
<description><![CDATA[Greg2600 posted : What's very ironic is that Verizon's SD quality on a channel such as TCM is so good, that TCM HD (upconverted) looks about the same on an HDTV.  Whereas someone like Comcast almost has to have TCM HD for HDTV's because their SD quality is so horrible.  So in line with what VZ Mark is saying, Verizon doesn't really need to add the HD version, because the SD is just as good.  But it makes Verizon look weaker because they don't have the HD version.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22672118</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 09:36:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22672114</link>
<description><![CDATA[darcilicious posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1444888" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1444888');">matcarl</a>:</small><br><br>Spongebob isn't in 16:9 though, but I notice that for the HD channels that show 4:3 content, the screen does get filled up slightly more than the SD version, maybe 1 inch on each side.<br> </div>Interesting -- I've never seen that myself. My TV is typically set at 1:1 mode and my 6200 is set with SD override off...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22672114</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 09:35:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22671936</link>
<description><![CDATA[matcarl posted : Spongebob isn't in 16:9 though, but I notice that for the HD channels that show 4:3 content, the screen does get filled up slightly more than the SD version, maybe 1 inch on each side.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22671936</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 08:58:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22671860</link>
<description><![CDATA[VZ Mark posted : I am aware of the ability for old movies to be digitized and the potential for them to be aired in high resolution. What I don't think will happen for quite sometime is that the extensive library of classic movies to be upconverted for HD channels. Maybe it's a case of 'build it and they will come' and by adding the channels it will push the movie companies, but some of these classic movies are in black and white...<br><br>And I was watching Spongebob in HD, but with my kids. That cartoon is pretty funny even for adults at times!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22671860</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 08:42:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22671093</link>
<description><![CDATA[URFloorMatt posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1653166" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1653166');">VZ Mark</a>:</small><br><br>I'm curious about the Cartoon Network since Nick HD, which VZ recently added, didn't seem to be worth it? Don't know much about cartoon production but are HD cartoons really worth the BW? My kid was thrilled to see the "HD" in the logo but I didn't see a major difference...anyone agree/disagree? <br> </div>I think Nick HD has a fair amount of HD during the daytime, and I have seen at least one teen sitcom airing during the day that's also HD.  The problem is Nick at Nite covers 8pm to some early hour and there's not yet any HD during that time, though George Lopez repeats could be.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22671093</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 00:21:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22671041</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1653166" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1653166');">VZ Mark</a>:</small><br><br>Subjective indeed! For example munson15 wants TCM in HD and I don't blame him. But in reality Turner CLASSIC Movies are all shot prior to HD technology and quality would not be the same as Discovery HD Theatre just for one example. Junk for one could be gold to another but to me the dot tv's are just plain crap...good discussion...<br> </div>No, this is wrong.  Assuming that HD Theater shoots most of its footage on digital video rather than film, it's maximum resolution is 1080p.  Anything that TCM airs that was shot on 32 mm film has much, much higher potential resolution.<br><br>Now, it's been stated at AVS that TCM will be upconverting for the next year, so that might cut against adding it in the short term.  But given how these carriage agreements generally work, adding TCM, HLN, TruTV, and Cartoon Network would seem well worth the effort.  These are four channels that, until recently, were standard fare for analog distribution by cable providers.  They all have high exposure, particularly Cartoon Network.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22671041</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 00:14:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22668823</link>
<description><![CDATA[darcilicious posted : Well, if you're watching SpongeBob then yeah, you're probably watching too much TV ;-)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22668823</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 16:32:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22668799</link>
<description><![CDATA[VZ Mark posted : Spongebob did look better in HD, just not sure it was as good as watching sports in SD and then switching to the HD feed of the same game and getting that 'WOW!' factor. Maybe I just watch too much damn TV???]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22668799</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 16:30:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22668737</link>
<description><![CDATA[darcilicious posted : I have noticed that programs in SD that are broadcast on HD channels almost always look better than they do on their original SD channels. <br><br>(At least if they don't do stretch and the like ;-) )]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22668737</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 16:23:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22668697</link>
<description><![CDATA[VZ Mark posted : Thanks for the feedback, besides this show are there any others that would also be noticeable? Part of the discussion on this thread is 'part-time' HD on full time HD channels. Seems to me like VZ is adding some of these HD channels faster than the providers can add HD content? ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22668697</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 16:18:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22668265</link>
<description><![CDATA[Baff posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1653166" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1653166');">VZ Mark</a>:</small><br><br>I'm curious about the Cartoon Network since Nick HD, which VZ recently added, didn't seem to be worth it? Don't know much about cartoon production but are HD cartoons really worth the BW? My kid was thrilled to see the "HD" in the logo but I didn't see a major difference...anyone agree/disagree? <br> </div>I want CN for Star Wars: The Clone Wars.  Very noticeable difference to me.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22668265</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 15:02:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22667744</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1394056" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1394056');">lcjawhit</a>:</small><br><br><div class="bquote">Is SYFY new?  I don't remember seeing it...<br> </div>Sci-Fi Channel is being renamed (stupidly) to SyFy.  Thank the boobs at NBC.<br> </div>That's just genius! i used to check my listings and ask "What's this Skiffy (SciFi) channel about?" Now I can phonetically figure it out!  :uhh:]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22667744</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 13:46:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22667754</link>
<description><![CDATA[matcarl posted : They may have some shows that are in HD, better to have it than not, I say!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22667754</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 13:44:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22667734</link>
<description><![CDATA[VZ Mark posted : I'm curious about the Cartoon Network since Nick HD, which VZ recently added, didn't seem to be worth it? Don't know much about cartoon production but are HD cartoons really worth the BW? My kid was thrilled to see the "HD" in the logo but I didn't see a major difference...anyone agree/disagree? ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22667734</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 13:42:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22667649</link>
<description><![CDATA[Greg2600 posted : Anything shot on 35mm or 70mm film, which includes I think almost all films anyone would ever want to watch, contain a resolution higher than 1080p.  So any of those could be converted to HD fairly easily.  I have no idea, but my guess is that Turner's Classics have not been converted to HD from their original stock.  TCM does show some newer films, but odds are they are still just SD copies.  <br><br>The next ones Verizon should go after are BBC, MSNBC, Comcast's, TCM, and Cartoon Network.  The Cablevision/Rainbow networks should be added, but we all know the story there.<br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1394056" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1394056');">lcjawhit</a>:</small><br><br>Is SYFY new?  I don't remember seeing it...<br> </div>Sci-Fi Channel is being renamed (stupidly) to SyFy.  Thank the boobs at NBC.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22667649</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 13:29:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22667641</link>
<description><![CDATA[darcilicious posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1444888" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1444888');">matcarl</a>:</small><br><br>Having everything would solve the problem  :p<br> </div>Agreed! (per my previous post ;-) )]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22667641</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 13:26:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22667635</link>
<description><![CDATA[darcilicious posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by RBost :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/275993" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=275993');">darcilicious</a>:</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1653166" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1653166');">VZ Mark</a>:</small><br><br>I think VZ does need to stress quality over quantity now that the 100HD barrier has been broken...<br> </div>And who decides what is "quality"? Very subject topic! Frankly, if a channel is in HD and won't substantially raise the cost to customers then Vz should carry it :p <br> </div>I disagree. Junk is junk,whether it is in HD or not.To me, quality far exceeds quantity.<br> </div>Your "junk" could very well be my treasure. I could care less about most sports in HD, most news in HD, etc, etc.  And I'm sure there are HD channels that I would never want to go without that you never watch. So between the two of us, who should be the judge of "quality"? I vote for me ;-)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22667635</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 13:26:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22667631</link>
<description><![CDATA[lcjawhit posted : Is SYFY new?  I don't remember seeing it...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22667631</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 13:25:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22667606</link>
<description><![CDATA[FIOSHD posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1653166" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1653166');">VZ Mark</a>:</small><br><br>Subjective indeed! For example munson15 wants TCM in HD and I don't blame him. But in reality Turner CLASSIC Movies are all shot prior to HD technology and quality would not be the same as Discovery HD Theatre just for one example. Junk for one could be gold to another but to me the dot tv's are just plain crap...good discussion...<br> </div>I'm not so sure of this.  It all depends on the quality of the transfer.  There is nothing inherent in film that makes it worse than something shot with an HD camera.....at least that is my understanding.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22667606</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 13:21:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22667581</link>
<description><![CDATA[matcarl posted : Having everything would solve the problem  :p]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22667581</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 13:18:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22667370</link>
<description><![CDATA[VZ Mark posted : Subjective indeed! For example munson15 wants TCM in HD and I don't blame him. But in reality Turner CLASSIC Movies are all shot prior to HD technology and quality would not be the same as Discovery HD Theatre just for one example. Junk for one could be gold to another but to me the dot tv's are just plain crap...good discussion...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22667370</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 12:49:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22667209</link>
<description><![CDATA[eric87m posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1552888" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1552888');">Greg2600</a>:</small><br><br>The .TV channels were actually a negative.  I wish they just plain got rid of them.<br> </div> agreed]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22667209</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 12:29:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22667004</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/275993" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=275993');">darcilicious</a>:</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1653166" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1653166');">VZ Mark</a>:</small><br><br>I think VZ does need to stress quality over quantity now that the 100HD barrier has been broken...<br> </div>And who decides what is "quality"? Very subject topic! Frankly, if a channel is in HD and won't substantially raise the cost to customers then Vz should carry it :p <br> </div>I disagree. Junk is junk,whether it is in HD or not.To me, quality far exceeds quantity.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22667004</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 12:13:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22666841</link>
<description><![CDATA[darcilicious posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1653166" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1653166');">VZ Mark</a>:</small><br><br>I think VZ does need to stress quality over quantity now that the 100HD barrier has been broken...<br> </div>And who decides what is "quality"? Very subject topic! Frankly, if a channel is in HD and won't substantially raise the cost to customers then Vz should carry it :p ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22666841</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 11:39:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22666796</link>
<description><![CDATA[VZ Mark posted : I agree that the dot tv's and even the Viacom HD's have minimal HD content. The dot TV's will be used in a trial for viewing on handsets. I don't watch these at home on my 62" DLP, not sure why I would watch them on my cell??? Spike HD is the best of the Viacom Channels, especially the new Jesse James show. I think VZ does need to stress quality over quantity now that the 100HD barrier has been broken...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22666796</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 11:33:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22664558</link>
<description><![CDATA[Greg2600 posted : The .TV channels were actually a negative.  I wish they just plain got rid of them.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22664558</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 22:40:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22664413</link>
<description><![CDATA[kba829 posted : Now that they've added Comedy Central, if they add BBC in HD, I could pretty much give up SD channels altogether. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22664413</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 22:15:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22663677</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/548382" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=548382');">JeepMatt</a>:</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1530721" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1530721');">munson15</a>:</small><br><br>Now it's Cablevision that is adding HD channels left and right & it's Verizon that's seemingly dead in the water like some rat-gnawed corpse when it comes to adding new channels. Go figure.<br> </div>Huh? They just added 12 HD channels in the past 2 months! <br> </div>At least 7 of these channels are pure fluff. The 6 .crap channels do not deserve to be on any line-up, and YES is merely a 24 hour informercial about the Yankees with about half of its programming in SD. Vz. needs to shine now that some of the better channels are becoming available in HD.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22663677</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 20:20:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22663630</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/548382" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=548382');">JeepMatt</a>:</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1530721" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1530721');">munson15</a>:</small><br><br>Now it's Cablevision that is adding HD channels left and right & it's Verizon that's seemingly dead in the water like some rat-gnawed corpse when it comes to adding new channels. Go figure.<br> </div>Huh? They just added 12 HD channels in the past 2 months! <br> </div>You can tell us that until you're blue in the face, but no one in the world considers the .TV channels real HD additions.<br><br>Verizon added six channels in the last two months, and destroyed the bandwidth for six other future channels.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22663630</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 20:05:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22663180</link>
<description><![CDATA[munson15 posted : That's right, they added Recipe TV at some point, didn't they? How silly of me to overlook that monumental achievement in the history of HD TV.  <br><br>The point I was trying to make is that if Cablevision (a company that until very recently has had a history of only adding new channels to their lineup slowly) can add new premium HD channels as they become available, Verizon should be able to as well. <br><br>EDIT:<br><br>Let me be perfectly clear here so there are no misunderstands. I'm bitter specifically about Cablevision carrying TCM HD, a channel I'd very much like to see in the FIOS HD lineup. I was a Cablevision customer for 20 years, and it was like trying to pull teeth from a crocodile in heat to get them to add new channels to their lineup, no matter how popular those channels were on other services. Now that they've got some competition, they're adding new channels like there's no tomorrow.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22663180</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 18:44:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22663077</link>
<description><![CDATA[JeepMatt posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1530721" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1530721');">munson15</a>:</small><br><br>Now it's Cablevision that is adding HD channels left and right & it's Verizon that's seemingly dead in the water like some rat-gnawed corpse when it comes to adding new channels. Go figure.<br> </div>Huh? They just added 12 HD channels in the past 2 months! <br><small>--<br>"ONE team - ONE city - ONE dream!!"</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22663077</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 18:26:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22663046</link>
<description><![CDATA[munson15 posted : What sickens me is that Cablevision is actually starting to carry some cool HD channels, like TCM HD, that I wish were available on FIOS. When I had CV, they were notoriously slow in adding any new channels, either in SD or HD. On those rare occasions when they did add new channels, along with the inevitable rate increase, they always acted like they were doing their customers the mother of all favors for doing so. <br><br>Now it's Cablevision that is adding HD channels left and right & it's Verizon that's seemingly dead in the water like some rat-gnawed corpse when it comes to adding new channels. Go figure.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22663046</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 18:22:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22661408</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : The new Comcast lineup looks very competitive but remember, we are still the only one that has the 6 .crap channels.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22661408</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 13:47:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22661085</link>
<description><![CDATA[armstrda posted : Man that new Portland area HD lineup isn't bad for Comcast.  Should make the transition easier if Frontier decides to screw us when the switch takes place.  Not looking forward to the PQ though.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22661085</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 12:47:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22660722</link>
<description><![CDATA[Greg2600 posted : MSNBC, Turner Classic Movies, TruTV, BET, not to mention that region already has Fuse, G4, Cartoon Network, We, IFC in HD.  Portland, though, for those who don't know, has been light years ahead of the rest of the country (except Boston) for Comcast.  <br><br>Hopefully Verizon adds a half dozen more HD channels this fall.  At some point though, the number of channels nor internet speed are not going to make a competitive difference, and the providers will have to sell based on other measures.  Verizon said recently that they are no longer going to compete on price, well, umm, that might make its way back into the equation.  And price wars, of course, are usually very ugly.  <br><br>If I were Verizon, I would really be focusing on getting more of the Web into the TV/STB.  That means web-video sites like You Tube, Hulu, Fancast and AOL, and not the worthless sites I've read they are going to offer.  I want to see old episodes of Thundercats or Welcome Back Kotter, not videos of some idiot skateboarding off a trash dumpster.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22660722</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 11:43:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22660020</link>
<description><![CDATA[JeepMatt posted : Check out this thread..<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="/forum/r22653935-HD-Portland-OR-new-HD-channels-effective-Sept-1st">[HD] Portland, OR new HD channels effective Sept 1st.</A><br><br>Comcast in the OR / WA area will be really competitive come 9/1...included in their lineup are a number of the ones Max1 listed earlier...<br><br>As the Beastie's used to say...no sleep til' Brooklyn!  :p<br><small>--<br>"ONE team - ONE city - ONE dream!!"</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22660020</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 09:20:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22649959</link>
<description><![CDATA[VZ Mark posted : Exactly! I'm hoping that Rainbow is spunoff from Cablevision but I'm not holding my breath for that either. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22649959</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 13:59:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22643606</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : Does anyone know if Chiller HD is available yet?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22643606</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 08:00:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22640874</link>
<description><![CDATA[MeatChicken posted :  The Comcasts, Turners, & BBC Am-HD, are the "important ones" for me... E! , Cartoon, TCM...<br> ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22640874</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 16:57:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22640854</link>
<description><![CDATA[almahix posted : There aren't any among those that I miss having in HD. Once everything is broadcast in native HD it would be good I suppose, but most channels just stretch or warp SD to fill the screen and it looks awful. I'll watch the SD channels rather than stretched/warped SD on HD channels.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22640854</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 16:52:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22640739</link>
<description><![CDATA[Roche1972 posted : MeatChicken, the Rainbow Media HD channels are owned by Cablevision along with MSG HD and MSG+ HD. Cablevision hates Verizon so don't look for those HD channels anytime soon.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22640739</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 16:27:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22639989</link>
<description><![CDATA[JeepMatt posted : Meat-<br>I'm interpreting it that we have no chance of seeing them since they're from Rainbow.<br><small>--<br>"ONE team - ONE city - ONE dream!!"</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22639989</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 14:06:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22639963</link>
<description><![CDATA[MeatChicken posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1653166" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1653166');">VZ Mark</a>:</small><br><br>You can scratch off the Rainbow Media HD's (4-7)...<br> </div> What does that mean?<br> We are getting others?<br> ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22639963</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 14:01:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22639689</link>
<description><![CDATA[VZ Mark posted : You can scratch off the Rainbow Media HD's (4-7)...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22639689</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 13:12:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22636274</link>
<description><![CDATA[JTBurn posted : Thanks Max 1.  Not much there I care about. Except the "Coming Soon to FIOS" stuff, and maybe AMC and E!.  20-22 sounds good to me.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22636274</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 18:33:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22635290</link>
<description><![CDATA[timrek posted : Add NASA HD (part time for now)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22635290</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 15:15:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re:  New HD Channels?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22635226</link>
<description><![CDATA[aaronwt posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1517020" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1517020');">Max1</a>:</small><br><br>Even though I don't want to sound like I'm complaining, because Fios is after all the leader in total number of HD channels available, they are missing quite a few HD channels.  The total number of available HD channels not carried by Fios, by my estimation, is 24 channels.  Here is the list:<br>Viacom<br>1&#9;BET HD<br>2&#9;BET J HD<br>3&#9;LOGO HD<br>Rainbow Media<br>4&#9;AMC HD<br>5&#9;IFC HD<br>6&#9;WE TV HD<br>7&#9;Fuse HD<br>Turner<br>8&#9;Cartoon Network HD<br>9&#9;TCM HD<br>10&#9;Tru TV HD<br>Fox<br>11&#9;Fuel HD<br>Independent<br>12&#9;Jewelry TV HD<br>13&#9;Fashion TV HD<br>14&#9;TV One HD<br>Comcast<br>15&#9;E! Entertainment HD<br>16&#9;G4 HD <br>17&#9;Style HD<br>NBC Universal <br>18&#9;MSNBC HD<br>Coming Soon to Fios&#9;<br>19&#9;Crime & Investigation HD<br>20&#9;CBS College Sports HD<br>21&#9;NBA TV HD<br>22&#9;Team HD (HD channel for NBA League Pass)<br>23&#9;RFD TV HD<br>24&#9;TBN HD<br>I wouldn't mind having the Turner & Comcast HD Channels.<br> </div>Well I guess that explains why I could't find BET-HD the other day when my girlfriend wanted me to record the BET awards show for her.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-New-HD-Channels-22635226</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 15:04:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

