wings10
I Am Legend
Premium
join:2004-06-09
South Elgin, IL | reply to pandora
Re: When will HD be the standard?
Does it costs the networks more to broadcast and carry 2 channels? One SD and one HD?
--
"The American Indians found out what happens when you don't control immigration." |
|
Jahntassa
What, I can have feathers
Premium
join:2006-04-14
Conway, SC
| It costs more to shoot programming and rebroadcast in HD. It also costs cable companies and distributors money to rebroadcast those signals.
Since many networks and studios sold off their SD equipment to try and make back some money from their HD investments, I don't think HD is going to be completely mainstream until most of the SD gear dies. |
|
tschmidt
Premium,MVM
join:2000-11-12
Milford, NH
 ·Hollis Hosting
 ·Verizon Online DSL
·Fairpoint Communic..
| reply to wings10
said by wings10  :Does it costs the networks more to broadcast and carry 2 channels? One SD and one HD? The short answer is it depends.
If station is broadcasting two different programs then obviously they have the cost of paying royalties on two programs. If they are the same then there is no additional cost.
The reason stations broadcast in both HD and SD format is not about OTA viewer but Sat and Cable. Often Sat and Cable providers have special relationship with broadcast station and get feed directly, not OTA. However in some cases Sat and Cable simply use OTA pickup. Since Cable will convert digital to analog standard definition broadcasting in SD give the station total control over image quality.
I assume over time you will see simulcasting in HD and SD decline.
A station is able to broadcast more programs in SD then HD. So if many programs is more important then video quality they will broadcast multiple SD channels.
Over the air station have 19 Mbps to play with. Precisely how they "spend" it is a business decision, HD or many SD.
/tom
|
|
wings10
I Am Legend
Premium
join:2004-06-09
South Elgin, IL | So they are using the same equipment and then ether up converting or down converting?
And using one camera like on the network news?
--
"The American Indians found out what happens when you don't control immigration." |
|
tschmidt
Premium,MVM
join:2000-11-12
Milford, NH
·Hollis Hosting
·Verizon Online DSL
·Fairpoint Communic..
| said by wings10 :So they are using the same equipment and then ether up converting or down converting? Correct, at the studio filming is done in either SD or HD format. It would be too cumbersome and expensive to have two sets of cameras. Assuming show is filmed in HD it is converted to SD.
Broadcast stations are able to simulcast multiple digital programs for free because they can fit both HD and SD program into a single digital OTA channel.
For Cable it is a different issue. They prefer to carry as many different programs as possible, not different versions of the same program. They have a limited amount of bandwidth. Ideally they would like to get rid of analog completely. In fact I think some MSOs have already done that. Some are looking at giving customers of basic cable a cable ready set top box that works much like the OTA converter box. It converts unencrypted QAM to analog SD NTSC. The converter box is cheap and prevents a lot of complaints by basic cable customers. I use OTA so am not really up on Cable industry.
/tom |
|
