<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>[H/W] Cisco 2621 and 2912 performance in Cisco</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r22626272</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 17:17:42 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 17:17:42 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: [H/W] Cisco 2621 and 2912 performance</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22643979</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1654824"><b>Centurion030</b></A> : I changed a few things...<br><br>I added ip route-cache flow to the outbound FastEthernet port. This gives me ~11 Mbps down and 3Mbps up. I think that is probably the best the 2621 can do.<br><br>However, using ip inspect got results as low as 768Kbps down to 5Mbps down.<br><br>Interesting.<br><br>James]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22643979</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 09:50:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [H/W] Cisco 2621 and 2912 performance</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22641194</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1654824"><b>Centurion030</b></A> : Thanks!<br><br>Any config hints on the inbound and outbound ports?<br><br>James]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22641194</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 17:57:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [H/W] Cisco 2621 and 2912 performance</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22626307</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1455989"><b>Euphrates</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by Centurion030 :</small><br><br>I've got a 2621, 64MB DRAM/16MB Flash, and a 2912. As an experiment, I configured the 2621 for NAT/PAT and to provide DHCP, 192.168.1.x/26. When I run speedtest.net and speakeasy, I get about 7Mbps down and about 2.5Mbps up. On a regular Linksys router/switch, I can get 14Mbps/3Mbps at speakeasy/speedtest. I have IP CEF set on the 2621. <br><br>I know it is an older router/switch setup, but the performance is identical to my "BearNet" setup that had a 2620, 2611, and 2924, 2912 and the 2620 had a NM-4E to connect to the 2611. I do have Comcast at Turbo so I know I have the BW potential. <br><br>I was hoping to replace my Linksys with this setup as I have my house wired for Ethernet.<br><br>Any hints? Only ACL so far is to allow the 192.168.1.x net for PAT.<br><br>Regards,<br><br>James<br> </div>From my experience, I've noticed that Internet speed tests tend to use a lot of packets that the router will deam as fragmented.  You may need to configure the CBAC (ip inspect) firewall with its ability to reassemble fragmented packets.  I found this out the hard way on my 871.  Once configured, I was able to get a better picture of what my device was capable of.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22626307</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 23:50:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>[H/W] Cisco 2621 and 2912 performance</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22626272</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : I've got a 2621, 64MB DRAM/16MB Flash, and a 2912. As an experiment, I configured the 2621 for NAT/PAT and to provide DHCP, 192.168.1.x/26. When I run speedtest.net and speakeasy, I get about 7Mbps down and about 2.5Mbps up. On a regular Linksys router/switch, I can get 14Mbps/3Mbps at speakeasy/speedtest. I have IP CEF set on the 2621. <br><br>I know it is an older router/switch setup, but the performance is identical to my "BearNet" setup that had a 2620, 2611, and 2924, 2912 and the 2620 had a NM-4E to connect to the 2611. I do have Comcast at Turbo so I know I have the BW potential. <br><br>I was hoping to replace my Linksys with this setup as I have my house wired for Ethernet.<br><br>Any hints? Only ACL so far is to allow the 192.168.1.x net for PAT.<br><br>Regards,<br><br>James]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22626272</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 23:38:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
