<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Bell/Acanac can but Teksavvy can&#x27;t?&#x27; in forum &#x27;TekSavvy&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/BellAcanac-can-but-Teksavvy-cant-22628766</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 03:20:47 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 03:20:47 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: DRY LOOP Fees</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-DRY-LOOP-Fees-22639923</link>
<description><![CDATA[Davesnothere posted : .<br>My inconsistent info gathering experience with Bell was during Spring to summer of last year.<br><br>Their loop was installed during July.<br><br>The nightmare began with my next statement.<br><br>If I was going to just circulate a lie, I could have used less words. ;)<br><br>Believe me folks, you absolutely MUST understand that this is BELL we are discussing here, and THAT, in and of itself says a lot.<br><br>I agree it's true that Dry Loops are becoming more common since then.<br><br>It's also true that a FEW of their reps told me what YOU just said, but most of them had some combination of the other variations I wrote about above, and each argued with me that each was right, when I told them what some of their co-workers had said.<br><br>Perhaps, especially as I in the end strongly urged the Bell Manager guy to do so, their front-line reps have indeed been better briefed since then about Dry Loops, and we can all certainly hope so.<br><br>In contrast, the TSI account setup was flawless, including the new dry loop for it, and including the work of the local Bell tech who did the hookup and test with me while we both were at the service location.<br><br>I have no beef with Bell's local techs. - They are just caught in the middle of all the troubles that Bell's other departments create with their bureaucracy, politics, and misinformation.<br><br>:)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-DRY-LOOP-Fees-22639923</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 13:54:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: DRY LOOP Fees</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-DRY-LOOP-Fees-22638892</link>
<description><![CDATA[jyeung posted : Bell does not charge its own customers for a dry loop. This is fact.<br><br>Wholesale DSL customers are charged accordingly by their ISP.<br><br>Not sure how they could have screwed it up. Dry loops are pretty common now, and all the Bell customer service reps I've talked with know this.<br><br>- Jason]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-DRY-LOOP-Fees-22638892</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 10:27:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>DRY LOOP Fees</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/DRY-LOOP-Fees-22638000</link>
<description><![CDATA[Davesnothere posted : From first-hand experience (with Bell, who else ?) mid last year, I discovered that there are almost as many variations of answer regarding cost involved in setting up / maintaining a Dry Loop as there are people at Bell to ask !<br><br>Some stated that they would charge me $10 per month for the DL regardless of who I get my DSL from (It was Bell at the time), while others said that if my DSL was from Bell that this fee would be waived.<br><br>(My thought was to migrate my way overpriced Bell Biz land line number to a Cell, killing that line's account at Bell, and also to sometimes use Skype, all of which which I later did manage to make happen, and rather effectively, I might add, though not without some growing pains.)<br><br>Still others said that Bell would only waive the monthly DL fee if I was a Bell Biz customer, but not for a Sympatico Residential peep (already knowing which type I was, though not necessarily my longer term reason for setting up the loop).<br><br>There were even some who first said to me "What's a Dry Loop ?" - Seriously !<br><br>Then some said that there would be a fee (I think it was around $100) to SET UP the dry loop, and would not take my word that there already were 2 perfectly good idle wire pairs, complete with RJ11 demarc jacks, at my service location from the most recent previous occupant, and that I had seen them work, as he overlapped his old service with mine while I was moving in, each of us on different pairs.<br><br>Eventually, I got to a Bell Manager (yes, folks, that's one above a Supervisor, and thanks in advance for the recognition of having achieved that ;), takes a bow, need Emoticon for that) in Ottawa, who identified himself and promised me that no matter who handled the order, that I would not be charged any of the fees I mentioned above (as long as I kept my DSL with Bell), and to have them consult him if they disagreed about this while taking my order.<br><br>I then placed the order.<br><br>All went as planned, technologically, though I had to call them to kill a new T&C screen in my browser, about which I was not forewarned and I flatly refused to agree to, making it a 'Deal-Breaker' with them.<br><br>Then when my next statement came in the mail, the BAS****s massacred it several ways to Sunday.<br><br>First, they charged me the monthly $10 for the Loop, though had promised not to, and insult to injury, they began to charge me $5 each month for a MODEM rental, though none was asked for nor sent.<br><br>I had to call and fight with Bill's Belling dept practically Every Month for the rest of last year over those 2 errors recurring, until I finally gave up on them and had TSI set me up another loop & DSL, and walked away from the Bell account.<br><br>Now Bell can chase ME for the $$, and I really do not care, as my financial situation already has bigger marks against it that this may cause.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/DRY-LOOP-Fees-22638000</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 02:45:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bell/Acanac can but Teksavvy can&#x27;t?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-BellAcanac-can-but-Teksavvy-cant-22629665</link>
<description><![CDATA[Guspaz posted : EDIT: My understanding of Bell's current dry-loop tariff (using band A for reference):<br><br>1) Unbundled loop fees are currently $8.50<br>2) Dry loop fees are 50% of that, so $4.25<br>3) TekSavvy marks that up by $3 to $7.25<br>4) Bell is proposing raising the unbundled loop fee to $10.64<br>5) Bell says they intend to propose that dry loop fees be made equal to unbundled fees since the cost to provide the service is the same<br>6) End result: dry loop goes from $4.25 to $10.64<br><br>The best-case scenario is probably dry loop fees increasing from $4.25 to $5.32, which TekSavvy could potentially eat and still charge $7.25 for band A. The worst case is dry loop fees more than double.<br><br>Of course, I could be reading this all wrong. Bell's tariffs are incredibly obtuse.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-BellAcanac-can-but-Teksavvy-cant-22629665</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 16:50:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bell/Acanac can but Teksavvy can&#x27;t?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-BellAcanac-can-but-Teksavvy-cant-22629381</link>
<description><![CDATA[darknestgirl posted : if she has a Bell phone line she doesn't have to pay for a dry loop and yes it's 8$/month with Acanac  it can be paid monthly or for the year. I've been with both company and didn't had any problem]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-BellAcanac-can-but-Teksavvy-cant-22629381</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 16:03:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bell/Acanac can but Teksavvy can&#x27;t?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-BellAcanac-can-but-Teksavvy-cant-22629333</link>
<description><![CDATA[jyeung posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1493204" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1493204');">justsomeguy</a>:</small><br><br>I got suspicious about this the other day, wondering if Teksavvy really remits the dry dsl band rates to bell, and if they do, are they<br>making a profit on them, or if 100% goes to Bell.<br> </div>As with any business, they do mark up the cost. Check the tariffs. A Band A monthly rate is $8.50 / 2 = $4.25/month according to the Access Services Tariff item 105.<br><br>- Jason]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-BellAcanac-can-but-Teksavvy-cant-22629333</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 15:54:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bell/Acanac can but Teksavvy can&#x27;t?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-BellAcanac-can-but-Teksavvy-cant-22629315</link>
<description><![CDATA[Fireblade posted : The only thing good that came out of Acanac is their VOIP service. Can't beat it for $9.95 / month for unlimited calling in NA with 10+ calling features.<br><small>--<br>I love fish sticks. I love putting fish sticks in my mouth.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-BellAcanac-can-but-Teksavvy-cant-22629315</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 15:50:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bell/Acanac can but Teksavvy can&#x27;t?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-BellAcanac-can-but-Teksavvy-cant-22629119</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : Yes, TS is indeed cheaper than Bell even with the dry loop added up. Acanac as it turns out, has offered $33.50 (after taxes) as monthly charge for 13months. This includes all the charges.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-BellAcanac-can-but-Teksavvy-cant-22629119</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 15:48:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bell/Acanac can but Teksavvy can&#x27;t?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-BellAcanac-can-but-Teksavvy-cant-22629244</link>
<description><![CDATA[Mike2009 posted : Many companies provide DSL service but only a few provide excellent customer service and technical support. The companies who provide service for ridiculously low prices usually skimp in those areas. That's what I meant by comparing apples and oranges. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-BellAcanac-can-but-Teksavvy-cant-22629244</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 15:39:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bell/Acanac can but Teksavvy can&#x27;t?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-BellAcanac-can-but-Teksavvy-cant-22629230</link>
<description><![CDATA[El Quintron posted : First off, any company can sell at a loss temporarily in order to be competitive. This is fairly common practice.<br><br>Second item worth mentionning is that Acanac is a spinoff of Canaca which is a med-sized business targeted IT company. They can afford to take a temporary hit, to gain clients.<br><br>This could be another reason that they may have chosen to eat the dryloop fee for the first year.<br><small>--<br>Working to bring you closer to a Bell and Rogers free household.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-BellAcanac-can-but-Teksavvy-cant-22629230</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 15:36:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bell/Acanac can but Teksavvy can&#x27;t?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-BellAcanac-can-but-Teksavvy-cant-22629090</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : This is not an apple/orange comparison. Both companies are DSL providers! If it was that kind of comparison, do you really think Acanac would be getting any customers?<br><br>I won't try to move this off-topic anymore but just want to state that I am TS user and suggest my friends to go with TS only. This post is <i>not about who is better</i>, but about policy and charges levied by different companies to different users.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-BellAcanac-can-but-Teksavvy-cant-22629090</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 15:17:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bell/Acanac can but Teksavvy can&#x27;t?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-BellAcanac-can-but-Teksavvy-cant-22629068</link>
<description><![CDATA[Martian3 posted : According to Acanac's website, they charge a flat $8 fee for dry loop (listed as naked DSL, found <A HREF="http://www.acanac.ca/NakedDSL.htm">here</a>).<br><br>If your friend isn't paying this fee, it's likely that Acanac is just eating the fee for the first year as part of their promotion.<br><br>Bell did charge retail customers the band rate for dry loop once upon a time, but no longer does so. However, Bell almost never proactively migrates customers off of old platforms or packages, so someone who signed up when band rate charges still were being applied will likely still be charged for it until she calls in and updates her package.<br><br>Even with the band rate charge, given that the vast majority of customers in Ontario and Quebec are in bands A-D and that the few who aren't are probably too far away from a DSLAM/remote to get DSL service anyway, Teksavvy still works out cheaper than Bell. Bell HS Performance is $47.95 + $3.95 mandatory modem rental fee, for a total of $51.90. The most current promotion I'm aware of is $5 off for 12 months, so if we want to include that the total ends up being $46.90 for the first year. Teksavvy by comparison in rate band D is $29.95 + $10.98, for a total of $40.93.<br><br>Looks to me like Bell has to drop the rate band on their own customers just to stay even remotely competitive.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-BellAcanac-can-but-Teksavvy-cant-22629068</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 15:11:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bell/Acanac can but Teksavvy can&#x27;t?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-BellAcanac-can-but-Teksavvy-cant-22629039</link>
<description><![CDATA[Madwand posted : Acanac charges $8 month... taxes included.  It is not free.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-BellAcanac-can-but-Teksavvy-cant-22629039</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 15:05:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bell/Acanac can but Teksavvy can&#x27;t?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-BellAcanac-can-but-Teksavvy-cant-22629036</link>
<description><![CDATA[Mike2009 posted : You're comparing apples and oranges my friend. Look at the reviews for each company and you'll see a huge difference.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-BellAcanac-can-but-Teksavvy-cant-22629036</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 15:05:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bell/Acanac can but Teksavvy can&#x27;t?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-BellAcanac-can-but-Teksavvy-cant-22629032</link>
<description><![CDATA[El Quintron posted : I was with Acanac from Oct 2007 to Oct 2008 for the One year package, they did not eat the dryloop fee at the time.<br><br>I was billed as follows (up front)<br>18.95 x12<br>+<br>7.95 (or 8.95, can't remember exactly) x12<br><br>for my first year of internet.<br><small>--<br>Working to bring you closer to a Bell and Rogers free household.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-BellAcanac-can-but-Teksavvy-cant-22629032</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 15:05:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bell/Acanac can but Teksavvy can&#x27;t?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-BellAcanac-can-but-Teksavvy-cant-22629031</link>
<description><![CDATA[justsomeguy posted : Can anyone confirm that acanac either charges or "eats" dry loop fees?<br><br>How about other providers?<br><br>I got suspicious about this the other day, wondering if Teksavvy really remits the dry dsl band rates to bell, and if they do, are they<br>making a profit on them, or if 100% goes to Bell.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-BellAcanac-can-but-Teksavvy-cant-22629031</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 15:05:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bell/Acanac can but Teksavvy can&#x27;t?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-BellAcanac-can-but-Teksavvy-cant-22628981</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : Bell may not be using the term, but I know someone personally who is being charged for the "dry loop" for the last few years. So your claim of not charging their own customers isn't 100% correct.<br><br>The math for the <i>high second year costs</i> also doesn't work when you compare it to TS. They charged something around $17/month for year 1. Now it is $33/month (with 1month extra) = around $600 for 2yrs. With TS it would be $31.45/month = $750 !!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-BellAcanac-can-but-Teksavvy-cant-22628981</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 15:00:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bell/Acanac can but Teksavvy can&#x27;t?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-BellAcanac-can-but-Teksavvy-cant-22628976</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : Ahh yes bell does use the term DRY LOOP]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-BellAcanac-can-but-Teksavvy-cant-22628976</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 15:00:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bell/Acanac can but Teksavvy can&#x27;t?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-BellAcanac-can-but-Teksavvy-cant-22628974</link>
<description><![CDATA[shepd posted : I have heard that Acanac eats the dry loop fees, although it does say on their website that they charge an extra $8 a month.<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.acanac.ca/NakedDSL.htm" >www.acanac.ca/NakedDSL.htm</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-BellAcanac-can-but-Teksavvy-cant-22628974</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 14:54:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bell/Acanac can but Teksavvy can&#x27;t?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-BellAcanac-can-but-Teksavvy-cant-22628969</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : Acanac charges for dry loop too.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-BellAcanac-can-but-Teksavvy-cant-22628969</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 14:53:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bell/Acanac can but Teksavvy can&#x27;t?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-BellAcanac-can-but-Teksavvy-cant-22628958</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : Neither Bell or Acanac is charging anything extra for the dry loop. Acanac never charged her for it during the last subscription period either.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-BellAcanac-can-but-Teksavvy-cant-22628958</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 14:53:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bell/Acanac can but Teksavvy can&#x27;t?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-BellAcanac-can-but-Teksavvy-cant-22628965</link>
<description><![CDATA[HiVolt posted : Acanac takes a loss in the first year. They could be absorbing the cost of the dryloop also. I'm not sure.<br><br>Every wholesaler has to pay for dryloop costs according to the band rate.<br><small>--<br>GOLF LEAFS GOLF!</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-BellAcanac-can-but-Teksavvy-cant-22628965</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 14:51:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bell/Acanac can but Teksavvy can&#x27;t?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-BellAcanac-can-but-Teksavvy-cant-22628952</link>
<description><![CDATA[Inssomniak posted : Bell also doesnt use the term dry loop, they dont charge their own customers a dry loop fee.  <br><br>But Acanac should be subject to dry loop costs.  Maybe Acanac throws it in? or makes up for it in Higher 2nd year costs?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-BellAcanac-can-but-Teksavvy-cant-22628952</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 14:48:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bell/Acanac can but Teksavvy can&#x27;t?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-BellAcanac-can-but-Teksavvy-cant-22628914</link>
<description><![CDATA[Mike2009 posted : Bell charges Teksavvy for the dryloop. It should be the same with Acanac.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-BellAcanac-can-but-Teksavvy-cant-22628914</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 14:41:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Bell/Acanac can but Teksavvy can&#x27;t?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/BellAcanac-can-but-Teksavvy-cant-22628766</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : Hi, I'm a bit intrigued and dismayed by the response one of my friends got from Teksavvy when she wanted to sign up for the PHS connection. She had been an Acanac user for the last year and wanted to move to something which is not as expensive as Acanac in the second year. After all options she said Teksavvy looked like the best option.<br><br>However, when she ordered the connection TS said she <b>will need</b> to pay for the dry loop connection as well. I was assuming she already had the dry loop as she was using Acanac since the last year.<br><br>So after checking her options she called Bell as they had a 3month free offer and they didn't have any problem sending her the package and didn't even ask her for the dryloop!<br><br>Soon after Acanac called her and offered her a "relatively" good deal and they never talked about the dry loop.<br><br>She is paying much more than she would have had she gone with TS yearly plan. But I'm wondering why TS was adamant on getting the dryloop activated if Acanac and Bell have no problem on that end whatsoever. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/BellAcanac-can-but-Teksavvy-cant-22628766</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 14:14:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

