| ZyWALL USG 100 v2.12(AQQ.0)C0 firmware is out ZyWALL USG 100 v2.12(AQQ.0)C0
»ftp://ftp.zyxel.com/ZYWALL_USG_100/fir···0)C0.zip
»ftp://ftp.zyxel.com/ZYWALL_USG_100/firmware/ZYWALL USG 100_2.12(AQQ.0)C0.zip
USG 100/200 User's Guide v2.12
»ftp://ftp.zyxel.com/ZYWALL_USG_100/use···2.12.pdf
»ftp://ftp.zyxel.com/ZYWALL_USG_100/use···e/ZYWALL USG 100_2.12.pdf
USG 100/200 CLI Reference Guide v2.11 Edition 2
»ftp://ftp.zyxel.com/ZYWALL_USG_100/cli···00_3.pdf
»ftp://ftp.zyxel.com/ZYWALL_USG_100/cli···e/ZYWALL USG 100_3.pdf |
|
| God save us . . . |
|
jmpage2
join:2005-02-24
Littleton, CO | reply to idolclub
Vaguely implies support for Vista on SSL but it is unclear to me if Windows 7 is also now supported for SSL VPN access. |
|
 bbarreraPremium,MVM
join:2000-10-23
Sacramento, CA
kudos:1 | Page 10 of the Release Notes has a nice table showing OS/Browser support for SSL VPN. It includes Win2k/XP/Vista/2003 along with Linux and Mac OS X. You need to closely review for supported browsers/OS and SSL VPN features. |
|
|
|
| reply to idolclub
I think MS is trying to ruin ZyXEL, everytime ZyXEL updates their SSL VPN implementasjon, MS releases a new OS thats not compatible ;P
--
"Perl is executable line noise, Python is executable pseudo-code."
|
|
bbarreraPremium,MVM
join:2000-10-23
Sacramento, CA
kudos:1 | I love the ancient Safari browser (Mac OS X) supported by SSL VPN
 |
|
jmpage2
join:2005-02-24
Littleton, CO | reply to dslpartner
If it works with Vista then there is a chance it will work with Win7 too.
I like Macs, so don't knock the Safari/OS X support!  |
|
bbarreraPremium,MVM
join:2000-10-23
Sacramento, CA
kudos:1 Reviews:
 ·SureWest Internet
| said by jmpage2:I like Macs, so don't knock the Safari/OS X support! I'm running Safari 4, and SSL VPN only supports Safari 2 according to the table. I'm guessing Safari 2 is Tiger only, and not Leopard (Safari 3/4) or the upcoming Snow Leopard (Safari 4).
I've been requesting Mac OS X support from ZyXEL for many years, and thankfully the 2.12 release supports L2TP/IPSec with Mac OS X (including the iPhone L2TP/IPSec client)! |
|
 BranoI hate VogonsPremium,MVM
join:2002-06-25
Burlington, ON
kudos:3
 ·Bell Fibe
| Although the ZLD development is too slow for my taste, it's good to see it's moving and bugs are fixed and new features introduced.
I just wish ZyXel would more listen to community and pick up the pace on critical issues. ...competition is not asleep.
--
openSUSE 11.1, KDE 4.2 |
|
| reply to idolclub
I'm a bit disappointed by some things.
The ZLD would have brought ZyXEL to better tergets, instead, except some new interesting features a part, we report some lacks in many functions. |
|
jmpage2
join:2005-02-24
Littleton, CO | reply to Brano
The reality is that there is no other $500 SSL UTM, at least not one that has any kind of real market support.
Despite the numerous shortcomings the USG family is still the most competitive UTM in class if you require SSL VPN. |
|
| said by jmpage2:The reality is that there is no other $500 SSL UTM, at least not one that has any kind of real market support. Despite the numerous shortcomings the USG family is still the most competitive UTM in class if you require SSL VPN. Draytek VigorPro 5300 SSL VPN UTM Router, bundled with 30 SSL VPN Tunnels, also a good choice. |
|
| reply to idolclub
Just for a fun history anecdote, way back when, about 10+ years ago, Draytek was started by people that left ZyXEL 
--
"Perl is executable line noise, Python is executable pseudo-code."
|
|
BranoI hate VogonsPremium,MVM
join:2002-06-25
Burlington, ON
kudos:3 | reply to idolclub
Indeed, Draytek routers are quite good and feature rich for decent money.
--
openSUSE 11.1, KDE 4.2 |
|
| reply to jmpage2
Works with Vista 32-bit in full tunnel mode, but doesn't work with Windows 7 or Vista 64-bit in full tunnel mode. The Securextender doesn't install, but then again if it is supposed to work then I don't know what to change... Any ideas? I tried with IE7, don't have Firefox installed on those machines yet... |
|
jmpage2
join:2005-02-24
Littleton, CO | Win7 has a 'XP' virtualization mode, give that a shot and see if it works. |
|
jmpage2
join:2005-02-24
Littleton, CO | reply to idolclub
The Draytek routers with SSL VPN that I found cost over $800, so the USG 100 at $480 is a heck of a lot cheaper. |
|
 mozerdLight Will Pierce The DarknessPremium,MVM
join:2004-04-23
Nepean, ON | said by jmpage2:The Draytek routers with SSL VPN that I found cost over $800, so the USG 100 at $480 is a heck of a lot cheaper. The VigorPro 5300n provides a remarkable value proposition in view of the fact that it also includes outstanding wireless 'N' [utilizing highend Ralink 'N' tech].
»www.guideband.com/product_info.p···s_id=131
--
David Mozer
IT-Expert on Call
Information Technology for Home and Business |
|
bbarreraPremium,MVM
join:2000-10-23
Sacramento, CA
kudos:1 Reviews:
·SureWest Internet
| reply to jmpage2
said by jmpage2:The reality is that there is no other $500 SSL UTM, at least not one that has any kind of real market support. Despite the numerous shortcomings the USG family is still the most competitive UTM in class if you require SSL VPN. Curious if anyone has looked at new Sonicwall lineup and pricing:
»www.sonicwall.com/us/products/13281.html
I still have an old SOHO3 at my brother-in-laws, and do understand that Sonicwall charges for access to firmware updates and of course they have various subscriptions if you want added features. Wondering how these stack up against ZyWALL USG series. |
|
jmpage2
join:2005-02-24
Littleton, CO | The Sonicwall TZ210 would be the closest thing to the ZyXel USG 100 (2 GigE ports, USB ports, 2 SSL clients, etc)... it does have the added benefit of integrated 802.11G/N.
It requires extra $$$$ though for features that are standard on the ZyXel box, such as an SPI firewall, which carries an annual subscription charge of around $150.
The box itself costs $850 or almost double what USG 100 costs.
I do believe that Sonicwall has far better phone support, etc, than ZyXel, but the boxes cost a LOT more. |
|
