<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>4G? in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r22629234</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 23:03:29 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 23:03:29 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: 4G?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22629641</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1206900"><b>fiberguy</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  sonicmerlin <A HREF="/useremail/u/1646149"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Can we please force the carriers to stop throwing around the 4G term when the service provides nothing close to actual 4G speeds?<br> </div>This is spewed over and over and over here... why is there a need to clog up BBR when it's not going to change anything?  So are we destined to hear the "4G term" anytime a BBR article is posted on it?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22629641</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 16:44:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 4G?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22629577</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1597781"><b>me1212</b></A> : I think they are using 4g as meaning 'more than what 3g can do'. That said wimax is NOT 4g, 4g is(in sweden anyway) 100/50 some wimax cannot do(I thinik wimax is about 70/I forget the UL) LTE can do 100/50(its what sweden is using).]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22629577</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 16:33:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 4G?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22629332</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1590874"><b>DarkLogix</b></A> : sorry they can and will trough 4G around until they start it all over again with 5G]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22629332</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 15:54:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 4G?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22629296</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/260677"><b>jeffjs</b></A> : 4G is more than just speed.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22629296</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 15:48:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>4G?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22629234</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1646149"><b>sonicmerlin</b></A> : Can we please force the carriers to stop throwing around the 4G term when the service provides nothing close to actual 4G speeds?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22629234</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 15:37:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
