? wasn't FTTH, but "very high speed internet"

Author	All Replies
TKJunkMail Enjoy the sun Premium join:2002-03-03 Avalon, NJ ·Sprint Mobile Broa.. ·Comcast 2 edits	reply to baineschile ? wasn't FTTH, but "very high speed internet" Actually the survey question wasn't FTTH. It was "very high speed internet, such as fiber". I think that also includes coax cable, especially Docsis 3 implementations. »www.flickr.com/photos/34800970@N···5636826/ LOL. Think the FTTH Council is exaggerating just a bit to make their point?? Also, anyone want to take any bets that the SC developer who did this survey is running fiber to his development? -- My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page
	to forum · permalink · · 2009-06-30 11:29:00 ·
S_engineer join:2007-05-16 Chicago, IL ·Comcast	said by TKJunkMail : Actually the survey question wasn't FTTH. It was "very high speed internet, such as fiber". I think that also includes coax cable, especially Docsis 3 implementations. »www.flickr.com/photos/34800970@N···5636826/ [att=1] LOL. Think the FTTH Council is exaggerating just a bit to make their point?? Also, anyone want to take any bets that the SC developer who did this survey is running fiber to his development? Yeah it sounds kind of hokey...on the other hand.....in the back of your mind it would still be a consideration. Would you buy into an area that was served with dial up or satellite? But yet again...keep imposing caps, throttling, and using other traffic shaping methods and people won't care anyways! -- BF69~~~Please stop suffocating gerbils!
S_engineer join:2007-05-16 Chicago, IL ·Comcast	to forum · permalink · · 2009-06-30 11:49:35 ·


Wednesday, 25-Nov 11:46:44	Terms of Use \| Privacy Policy \| Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo \| feedback \| contact over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com. page compression OFF