<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>80 Meters in Ham Radio</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r22633919</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 22:25:17 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 22:25:17 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: 80 Meters</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22658997</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Well, you can always try the Country Cousins. :)<br>Nice group of people. 7-9PM on 3.968 and 9 to whenever on 3.970]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22658997</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 22:59:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 80 Meters</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22639460</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/436079"><b>DrStrange</b></A> : <small><div class="bquote"><small>said by  n2jtx <A HREF="/useremail/u/285788"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>  I recall one amateur AM station out of New England that used play DJ and broadcast uninterrupted music.  His audio was good and I did not mind the genre but that was not the place to be doing it. </div></small><br><br>Somebody needed to take up a collection and buy him a Ramsey kit. If you're going to play DJ, do it on the proper band.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22639460</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 12:27:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 80 Meters</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22637550</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1242532"><b>n_w95482</b></A> : I hadn't actually thought of that, good idea :). The beach isn't too far from me either.<br><small>--<br>KI6RIT</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22637550</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 23:29:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 80 Meters</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22637098</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/206593"><b>GeekNJ</b></A> : If you can't get something setup at home, you can always go portable to some mountain in CA or beach, setup a rig and a battery with a portable antenna or dipole and have a blast. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22637098</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 21:35:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 80 Meters</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22636962</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1242532"><b>n_w95482</b></A> : I went around on 80 meters this past weekend for Field Day (first time on HF :D), and had tons of friendly contacts. I found a couple of people that were just talking about random stuff, I listened for a minute then moved on.<br><br>I had a lot of fun working 15 and 80 this past weekend though. Hopefully I can get some kind of HF setup going soon (moving into a condo), if not, I'll impatiently wait until Field Day next year.<br><small>--<br>KI6RIT</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22636962</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 21:03:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 80 Meters</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22636505</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/430868"><b>Ender3rd</b></A> : Your perception of 75/80 meters is shared by many. People tend to gather in little cliques and do not always welcome "intruders". On the other hand, quite a few groups like having someone new show up. <br><br>Things have loosened up a bit since the expansion of the phone portion, and it's actually possible to find open spots to call CQ between 3.700 and 3.800 most evenings.<br><br>To be honest, very few people on 75/80 meters get too excited about working low powered stations. With summer static crashes and other stations running power on frequencies close by, a QRP station will get swallowed up in short order. Unfortunately, it often seems that the weaker someone is, the longer they talk... Most people I know like to sit back with their feet up and work other stations that are strapping in at S-9 +60dB.<br><br>You're right about the bitching that goes on. There's a few cantankerous characters on that band. There always has been, and there always will be. It makes it all the more interesting in my opinion!  <br><small>--<br>My Jeep is not an SUV.  Your SUV is not a Jeep.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22636505</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 19:21:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 80 Meters</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22635150</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/206593"><b>GeekNJ</b></A> : Ah with 5w, in that case calling CQ is probably a bit of a challenge. <br><br>During large contests, there are always the folks rag chewing and the entire conversation seems to be about the contest and that they refuse to participate. I guess when you've got nothing to do but complain, you get good at it after a while. <br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://www.levinecentral.com/optimize-ool.html">Tweaked your connection?</a> | <A HREF="http://www.mailparse.com">Mail Parse</a> | <A HREF="http://www.levinecentral.com/ool/speed.asp">Speed Converter</a></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22635150</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 14:52:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 80 Meters</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22634837</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1269402"><b>battleop</b></A> : I've tried calling CQ with 5 watts on the last 3 field days with no contacts.  It's works out better to search for strong signals and reply to them.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22634837</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 13:55:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 80 Meters</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22634490</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/206593"><b>GeekNJ</b></A> : Why not pick a clear run frequency and start calling CQ? That way the folks you're writing about aren't involved. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22634490</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 13:02:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 80 Meters</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22634314</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/285788"><b>n2jtx</b></A> : 75/80 tends to have a lot of nets and "local" ragchew groups, most likely because of the shorter propagation.  They do tend to get very territorial.  I also recall about a dozen years ago, before Riley Hollingsworth got started, 75/80 was a big cesspool and was one of the factors in the FCC getting involved in enforcement again.  I recall one amateur AM station out of New England that used play DJ and broadcast uninterrupted music.  His audio was good and I did not mind the genre but that was not the place to be doing it.  75/80 is definitely much better now than it was in the 1990's but I guess there is always room for improvement.  I rarely work the band myself due to antenna issues but occasionally work some old friends on a net on Sunday evenings when conditions permit.<br><small>--<br>I support the right to keep and arm bears.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22634314</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 12:33:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 80 Meters</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22634197</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : I ignore them, 80 meters isn't a special band, I follow the same protocol I do on the other bands.  If someone is upset that oatmeal now comes in flavors, shame on them.<br><br>Had someone lambaste me for asking if the frequency was in use.  "The frequency is ALWAYS in use".  My reply was nice and used logic, "I listened for 2 minutes, heard nothing, and asked if it was in use.  Would you rather me simply start calling CQ?".  He changed his tune.<br><br>It's just radio.  There are more good operators than bad.  I just ignore the LIDS.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22634197</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 12:20:13 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>80 Meters</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22633919</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1269402"><b>battleop</b></A> : Is it me or is 80 meters just the most unfriendly place on the bands.   Every other band I have tried is filled with friendly guys who enjoy a QSO.   On 80 it seems like it's filled with old farts who think they own frequencies and do nothing but complain about other guys who get near their frequency.<br><br>I worked the 80meter station at field day and I was amazed at how many assholes there were bitching about field day and how it cluttered up the bands.  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22633919</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 11:43:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
