  TKJunkMail Enjoy the sun Premium join:2002-03-03 Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast
| 1 year + 90 days is plenty of time to decide
The FCC still hasn't fixed their "deemed granted" rule, which gives baby bells automatic approval if the agency can't agree on a decision within one year plus a 90 day extension. This rule doesn't need fixing. That amount of time is plenty for a bureaucracy, even one as screwed up as the FCC, to make a decision. All government agencies need to have their feet held to the fire to make them be responsive and timely in their decisions. -- My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page |
|
 sonicmerlin
join:2009-05-24 Cleveland, OH
| Um...yes the rule DOES need fixing. It's terrible and illogical.
The FCC doesn't need a "fire" to keep it peppy. It needs less Republicans nominating people who cater to special-interests.
Unfortunately the FCC has done all it can for the forebearance issue. It's up to Congress to go on from here.
A year ago a bill was proposed in Congress in an attempt to fix the problem, but the bill went nowhere. Hopefully someone can resuscitate the bill. |
|
 JSRoman Premium join:2005-03-10 Callahan, FL | I wonder who was in charge of Congress last year. -- »www.seabee.navy.mil |
|
  vpoko Premium join:2003-07-03 Jamaica Plain, MA
| reply to TKJunkMail said by TKJunkMail :The FCC still hasn't fixed their "deemed granted" rule, which gives baby bells automatic approval if the agency can't agree on a decision within one year plus a 90 day extension. This rule doesn't need fixing. That amount of time is plenty for a bureaucracy, even one as screwed up as the FCC, to make a decision. All government agencies need to have their feet held to the fire to make them be responsive and timely in their decisions. Easy solution: any request not ruled upon within 1 year + a 90 extention is deemed denied. |
|
  TKJunkMail Enjoy the sun Premium join:2002-03-03 Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast
3 edits | said by vpoko :said by TKJunkMail :The FCC still hasn't fixed their "deemed granted" rule, which gives baby bells automatic approval if the agency can't agree on a decision within one year plus a 90 day extension. This rule doesn't need fixing. That amount of time is plenty for a bureaucracy, even one as screwed up as the FCC, to make a decision. All government agencies need to have their feet held to the fire to make them be responsive and timely in their decisions. Easy solution: any request not ruled upon within 1 year + a 90 extention is deemed denied. There was an act introduced in Congress this year to address your concerns. But it doesn't reverse the deemed approved to deemed denied. It forces the FCC to rule one way or the other within the 1yr+90 timeframe.
Protecting Consumers Through Proper Forbearance Procedures Act, H.R. 400, 111th Cong. (2009) (proposing to delete the deemed grant language in Section 10(c) and replace it with the requirement that the Commission grant or deny a forbearance petition within the one year, plus 90-day extension, timeframe). The bill has been sitting in Committee since Jan: »thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z···r.00400: Text of bill: »thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c111:H.R.400:
Of course, there is nothing in the bill laying out penalties on the FCC if they neither approve nor deny a petition. Maybe if they added that the FCC commissioners go to prison for 6 months if they refuse to act. That would make me happy. -- My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page |
|
  BF69
join:2004-07-28 Camden, TN
| reply to JSRoman said by JSRoman :I wonder who was in charge of Congress last year. maybe some republicans added some garbage that had nothing to do with the bill and that's why it went no where. LEARN how DC works. |
|
  Flibbetigibbet
@bellsouth.net | reply to sonicmerlin Yep, there's no catering to unions now that we have Government Motors, or to the MPAA or RIAA from of the Party of Hollywood, no sirree...  |
|
 sonicmerlin
join:2009-05-24 Cleveland, OH
| reply to BF69 Exactly. Many, many bills proposed by some very consumer-oriented Democrats (like Rep. Eric Massa) are frequently gutted and mangled by Republicans, and Democrats have to compromise to have any hope of getting the bill through.
Not that Democrats themselves are perfect, but their philosophy is by and large much less corporation-favoring than Republicans. |
|
  TKJunkMail Enjoy the sun Premium join:2002-03-03 Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast
| said by sonicmerlin :Exactly. Many, many bills proposed by some very consumer-oriented Democrats (like Rep. Eric Massa) are frequently gutted and mangled by Republicans, and Democrats have to compromise to have any hope of getting the bill through. Not that Democrats themselves are perfect, but their philosophy is by and large much less corporation-favoring than Republicans. Boringggg! Almost everyone of your posts say the same thing. -- My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page |
|
  Build1
@speakeasy.net | reply to BF69 And the year before that. |
|
 rahvin112
join:2002-05-24 Sandy, UT
| reply to sonicmerlin It's not just the republicans. The Dem's take as much money from the communication companies (and their unions) than the Repub's do. The issue is interference in an agency that should be guided by science and consumer protection. The FCC should be structured more like the Fed with lifetime appointments, approval of congress and a firm commitment to consumer protection being the primary basis for appointment. |
|
  KrK Heavy Artillery For The Little Guy Premium join:2000-01-17 Tulsa, OK
·AT&T Yahoo
·AT&T DSL Service
·Cox HSI
·AT&T Southwest
1 edit | reply to TKJunkMail What it allows the ILEC's to do is keep requesting things repeatedly until the backlog allows them to be granted whatever they want. It also allows people within the FCC who favor certain companies agendas to simply stall and drag out the process to create an instant win for their side--- perhaps on an issue that would not ever have passed muster.
-- "Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power." -- Benito Mussolini
|
|
  KrK Heavy Artillery For The Little Guy Premium join:2000-01-17 Tulsa, OK
·AT&T Yahoo
·AT&T DSL Service
·Cox HSI
·AT&T Southwest
| reply to TKJunkMail said by TKJunkMail :Boringggg! Almost everyone of your posts say the same thing. Ha!  -- "Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power." -- Benito Mussolini
|
|
  digitalfreak
join:2005-12-09 49533 | Oh so true! |
|
  digitalfreak
join:2005-12-09 49533 | reply to TKJunkMail Well, if it makes you happy, then everyone should be against it. |
|
  rawgerz In Debt we trust Premium join:2004-10-03 Grove City, PA | reply to KrK haha! |
|
 sonicmerlin
join:2009-05-24 Cleveland, OH | reply to TKJunkMail Unfortunately it's because people like you spread lies and slander disguised as "truth" about topics that others know very little about. I feel compelled to show them the other side. |
|
 sonicmerlin
join:2009-05-24 Cleveland, OH
| reply to rahvin112 Considering how a lot of policy initiated or bills proposed by Democrats tends to be unfavorable towards those companies, I suspect the CEOs aren't the ones handing out campaign money for the Dems.
Either way I totally agree with you about how the FCC should be structured. Were that the case, there's no question the broadband industry would leapfrog the rest of the world in less than a decade. |
|
 vinnie97
join:2003-12-05 Mesquite, TX | reply to digitalfreak Your anti TJ one-line quips are getting old and your asinine, unsupported conclusions also reek. |
|
 Metatron2008
join:2008-09-02 Stockbridge, GA
·AT&T Wireless Broa..
·DIRECTV
·Charter Pipeline
·America Online
·Skype
·Vonage
·AT&T Southeast
2 edits | reply to TKJunkMail I can't believe nobody got what you were saying. The reason this sort of thing happens is because the FCC is lazy, disorganized, and let's thing slip until they end. Your saying keep them on the leash, make sure they do something.
Otherwise, even with the law changed, the FCC will still drag things out and be lazy about it.
Maybe some people should read with their head and not their heart. |
|