Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » FCC Cleans Up 'Forbearance' Process » 1 year + 90 days is plenty of time to decide
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
99
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
« Time to get out the axe.  
page: 1 · 2
AuthorAll Replies


TKJunkMail
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast

 1 year + 90 days is plenty of time to decide

The FCC still hasn't fixed their "deemed granted" rule, which gives baby bells automatic approval if the agency can't agree on a decision within one year plus a 90 day extension.
This rule doesn't need fixing. That amount of time is plenty for a bureaucracy, even one as screwed up as the FCC, to make a decision. All government agencies need to have their feet held to the fire to make them be responsive and timely in their decisions.
--
My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page

sonicmerlin

join:2009-05-24
Cleveland, OH

Um...yes the rule DOES need fixing. It's terrible and illogical.

The FCC doesn't need a "fire" to keep it peppy. It needs less Republicans nominating people who cater to special-interests.

Unfortunately the FCC has done all it can for the forebearance issue. It's up to Congress to go on from here.

A year ago a bill was proposed in Congress in an attempt to fix the problem, but the bill went nowhere. Hopefully someone can resuscitate the bill.

JSRoman
Premium
join:2005-03-10
Callahan, FL
I wonder who was in charge of Congress last year.
--
»www.seabee.navy.mil


vpoko
Premium
join:2003-07-03
Jamaica Plain, MA

reply to TKJunkMail
said by TKJunkMail See Profile :

The FCC still hasn't fixed their "deemed granted" rule, which gives baby bells automatic approval if the agency can't agree on a decision within one year plus a 90 day extension.
This rule doesn't need fixing. That amount of time is plenty for a bureaucracy, even one as screwed up as the FCC, to make a decision. All government agencies need to have their feet held to the fire to make them be responsive and timely in their decisions.
Easy solution: any request not ruled upon within 1 year + a 90 extention is deemed denied.


TKJunkMail
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast


3 edits
said by vpoko See Profile :

said by TKJunkMail See Profile :

The FCC still hasn't fixed their "deemed granted" rule, which gives baby bells automatic approval if the agency can't agree on a decision within one year plus a 90 day extension.
This rule doesn't need fixing. That amount of time is plenty for a bureaucracy, even one as screwed up as the FCC, to make a decision. All government agencies need to have their feet held to the fire to make them be responsive and timely in their decisions.
Easy solution: any request not ruled upon within 1 year + a 90 extention is deemed denied.
There was an act introduced in Congress this year to address your concerns. But it doesn't reverse the deemed approved to deemed denied. It forces the FCC to rule one way or the other within the 1yr+90 timeframe.
Protecting Consumers Through Proper Forbearance Procedures Act, H.R. 400, 111th Cong. (2009)
(proposing to delete the deemed grant language in Section 10(c) and replace it with the requirement that the
Commission grant or deny a forbearance petition within the one year, plus 90-day extension, timeframe).
The bill has been sitting in Committee since Jan:
»thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z···r.00400:
Text of bill: »thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c111:H.R.400:

Of course, there is nothing in the bill laying out penalties on the FCC if they neither approve nor deny a petition. Maybe if they added that the FCC commissioners go to prison for 6 months if they refuse to act. That would make me happy.
--
My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page


BF69

join:2004-07-28
Camden, TN

reply to JSRoman
said by JSRoman See Profile :

I wonder who was in charge of Congress last year.
maybe some republicans added some garbage that had nothing to do with the bill and that's why it went no where. LEARN how DC works.


Flibbetigibbet

@bellsouth.net
reply to sonicmerlin
Yep, there's no catering to unions now that we have Government Motors, or to the MPAA or RIAA from of the Party of Hollywood, no sirree...

sonicmerlin

join:2009-05-24
Cleveland, OH

reply to BF69
Exactly. Many, many bills proposed by some very consumer-oriented Democrats (like Rep. Eric Massa) are frequently gutted and mangled by Republicans, and Democrats have to compromise to have any hope of getting the bill through.

Not that Democrats themselves are perfect, but their philosophy is by and large much less corporation-favoring than Republicans.


TKJunkMail
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast

said by sonicmerlin See Profile :

Exactly. Many, many bills proposed by some very consumer-oriented Democrats (like Rep. Eric Massa) are frequently gutted and mangled by Republicans, and Democrats have to compromise to have any hope of getting the bill through.

Not that Democrats themselves are perfect, but their philosophy is by and large much less corporation-favoring than Republicans.
Boringggg! Almost everyone of your posts say the same thing.
--
My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page


Build1

@speakeasy.net
reply to BF69
And the year before that.

rahvin112

join:2002-05-24
Sandy, UT

reply to sonicmerlin
It's not just the republicans. The Dem's take as much money from the communication companies (and their unions) than the Repub's do. The issue is interference in an agency that should be guided by science and consumer protection. The FCC should be structured more like the Fed with lifetime appointments, approval of congress and a firm commitment to consumer protection being the primary basis for appointment.


KrK
Heavy Artillery For The Little Guy
Premium
join:2000-01-17
Tulsa, OK
·AT&T Yahoo
·AT&T DSL Service
·Cox HSI
·AT&T Southwest


1 edit
reply to TKJunkMail
What it allows the ILEC's to do is keep requesting things repeatedly until the backlog allows them to be granted whatever they want. It also allows people within the FCC who favor certain companies agendas to simply stall and drag out the process to create an instant win for their side--- perhaps on an issue that would not ever have passed muster.

--
"Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power." -- Benito Mussolini


KrK
Heavy Artillery For The Little Guy
Premium
join:2000-01-17
Tulsa, OK
·AT&T Yahoo
·AT&T DSL Service
·Cox HSI
·AT&T Southwest

reply to TKJunkMail
said by TKJunkMail See Profile :

Boringggg! Almost everyone of your posts say the same thing.
Ha!
--
"Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power." -- Benito Mussolini


digitalfreak

join:2005-12-09
49533
Oh so true!


digitalfreak

join:2005-12-09
49533
reply to TKJunkMail
Well, if it makes you happy, then everyone should be against it.


rawgerz
In Debt we trust
Premium
join:2004-10-03
Grove City, PA
reply to KrK
haha!

sonicmerlin

join:2009-05-24
Cleveland, OH
reply to TKJunkMail
Unfortunately it's because people like you spread lies and slander disguised as "truth" about topics that others know very little about. I feel compelled to show them the other side.

sonicmerlin

join:2009-05-24
Cleveland, OH

reply to rahvin112
Considering how a lot of policy initiated or bills proposed by Democrats tends to be unfavorable towards those companies, I suspect the CEOs aren't the ones handing out campaign money for the Dems.

Either way I totally agree with you about how the FCC should be structured. Were that the case, there's no question the broadband industry would leapfrog the rest of the world in less than a decade.

vinnie97

join:2003-12-05
Mesquite, TX
reply to digitalfreak
Your anti TJ one-line quips are getting old and your asinine, unsupported conclusions also reek.

Metatron2008

join:2008-09-02
Stockbridge, GA
·AT&T Wireless Broa..
·DIRECTV
·Charter Pipeline
·America Online
·Skype
·Vonage
·AT&T Southeast


2 edits
reply to TKJunkMail
I can't believe nobody got what you were saying. The reason this sort of thing happens is because the FCC is lazy, disorganized, and let's thing slip until they end. Your saying keep them on the leash, make sure they do something.

Otherwise, even with the law changed, the FCC will still drag things out and be lazy about it.

Maybe some people should read with their head and not their heart.
-
Forums » FCC Cleans Up 'Forbearance' Process« Time to get out the axe.  
page: 1 · 2


Friday, 27-Nov 02:27:52 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [112] Time Warner Cable Fires Broadside At Broadcasters
· [109] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [95] Apple Joins AT&T Verizon Snark Fest
· [87] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [70] TiVo Sees Record Customer Losses
· [63] In-Flight Internet Headed For Bumpy Landing?
· [56] Thanksgiving Open Thread
· [38] ICANN Slams DNS Redirection
· [36] Senators Want ACTA Made Public
· [35] EFF Wages War On Fine Print
Most people now reading
· Newegg Black Friday Sale started [Users Find Hot Deals]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Whats the big deal about being "Old School"....? [World of Warcraft]
· Bell Response to PIPEDA Request [TekSavvy]
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]
· HOW-TO: QoS and Tomato (fixes "choppy voice") [MagicJack]
· SSD [Computer Hardware Discussion/Reviews]
· Ottawa South Highspeed - WOW! [Canadian Broadband]
· [ Classes] DK best DPS spec [World of Warcraft]