http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r22637345 en Tue, 01 Dec 2009 12:11:05 EDT Tue, 01 Dec 2009 12:11:05 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22655958 Wyldemusick : Having major issues in Tucson tonight...connection is in and out, web pages are loading sporadically (and often without images), speed is all over the place (one speed test showed 896 as a downstream speed!) and resetting the modem and router and rebooting the computers isn't helping in the slightest.

Any clues? All calling Cox gets me right now is the automated system....]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22655958 Sun, 05 Jul 2009 02:32:55 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22640463 soulcatch6 : This is Wally0101, guess I had already registered.

Anyhow at work right now will message MAC as soon as I get home.

Speeds seemed better this morning, But newgroups have been slow for a couple weeks now.

thanks for taking the time to look into this for me.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22640463 Wed, 01 Jul 2009 15:36:55 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22640050 needforspeed59 : Wally needs to register with BBR to use the PM feature.
--
Great success! High five!]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22640050 Wed, 01 Jul 2009 14:17:19 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22640008 CoxAZTech3 : If you want to PM me your MAC address I would be happy to take a look into this

Thanks,
Yousef Cox Arizona ]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22640008 Wed, 01 Jul 2009 14:10:24 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22637692 anon : West Coast (slow but useable)


Versus

East Coast: (Not working at all)
]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22637692 Wed, 01 Jul 2009 00:42:01 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22637716 fuddyduddy : Slow in Queen Creek AZ tonight.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22637716 Wed, 01 Jul 2009 00:24:08 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22637688 bowlingblogg : Mine is very slow here in Tucson as well. Speed tests do pretty well, but browsing is glacial. Forget streaming video!]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22637688 Wed, 01 Jul 2009 00:12:32 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22637625 needforspeed59 : Hmmm..just as a reference if any Cox techs are reading these posts tonight, I am doing good in North Glendale.

--
Great success! High five!]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22637625 Tue, 30 Jun 2009 23:53:23 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22637551 brian2220 : i agree i am having major slow speeds
im in downtown glendale ]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22637551 Tue, 30 Jun 2009 23:29:55 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22637383 dagnasty1 : Definitely something going on tonight. Normally pull 1700K down from Giganews but tonight...250K :(]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22637383 Tue, 30 Jun 2009 22:44:35 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22637345 anon : What's happening in tucson tonight. Internet is super slow. Especially to any site on east coast.

Tried to call Cox but they say thier phone system is down due to an emergency. And thier web page does not load at all.

I mostly see the slow downs on newsgroups. They are crawling. I use a premium server and switched to cox, but are downloading headers at 19 kbps!!

From »measurementlab.net/ The bold sections are really troublesome. Seems like Cox is shaping.

WEB100 Enabled Statistics:
Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done
checking for firewalls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done
running 10s outbound test (client-to-server [C2S]) . . . . . 2.88Mb/s
running 10s inbound test (server-to-client [S2C]) . . . . . . 105.16kb/s

------ Client System Details ------
OS data: Name = Windows XP, Architecture = x86, Version = 5.1
Java data: Vendor = Sun Microsystems Inc., Version = 1.6.0_14

------ Web100 Detailed Analysis ------
10 Mbps Ethernet link found.
Link set to Full Duplex mode
Information: throughput is limited by other network traffic.
Good network cable(s) found
Normal duplex operation found.

Web100 reports the Round trip time = 187.47 msec; the Packet size = 1460 Bytes; and
There were 14 packets retransmitted, 43 duplicate acks received, and 41 SACK blocks received
The connection stalled 3 times due to packet loss
The connection was idle 1.33 seconds (12.09%) of the time
S2C throughput test: Packet queuing detected: 99.41%
This connection is network limited 99.8% of the time.
Excessive packet loss is impacting your performance, check the auto-negotiate function on your local PC and network switch]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22637345 Tue, 30 Jun 2009 22:35:11 EDT