bbiab
join:2004-05-26
| reply to sMURF
Re: Bell finally fixed the IKNS remotes (somewhat)
Not sure why you think your problems are due to IKNS. In fact, I don't think there ever was a problem with down, only the reporting of stats. Up, on the other hand, still no change @ 736 here. Some will say there is no reason for this or does not exist anymore, but then they never say how to fix. This is real of course, documented from the beginning. Ping is fine, no idea what the stats say, don't care. |
|
Gokuu
join:2001-08-27
| If you had bothered to read the OP, you would have realized that he was talking about UPSTREAM.
If you have no idea about the stats and "don't care", then please don't bother posting and wasting our time if you have nothing of value to add to the conversation.
I have been on an IKNS remote since March 2009, and I have always had correct upstream attenuation with my ST516. Upstream is at a perfect 800kbit, however this wasn't the case when on 2+. I was never able to get anything close to the 1088 which is in Bell's official profile.
said by bbiab  :Not sure why you think your problems are due to IKNS. In fact, I don't think there ever was a problem with down, only the reporting of stats. Up, on the other hand, still no change @ 736 here. Some will say there is no reason for this or does not exist anymore, but then they never say how to fix. This is real of course, documented from the beginning. Ping is fine, no idea what the stats say, don't care. |
|
bbiab
join:2004-05-26
1 edit | OP be talking about interleave and ping time. Not using ST516. |
|
