 jester121Premium join:2003-08-09 Lake Zurich, IL Reviews:
·voip.ms
| reply to iansltx
Re: This is news? said by iansltx:Combine that with the fact that you can't cap and tier by GB per month in a competitive (read: FiOS) market What if Verizon decides to institute caps? |
|
 iansltx join:2007-02-19 Golden, CO kudos:2 Reviews:
·Comcast
| Then we're screwed.
Kidding, kidding. Then someone else will try to roll out a high-end fiber network in muni NYC, since bandwidth is pretty cheap anyway.
Also, remember that Verizon is competing against Cablevision, who has already said they aren't going to cap. o if Verizon capped they'd lose customers in half their NYC market. That or they'd have to have dcaps in one half and no caps in the other. A messy siatuation to be sure.
Also FYI ALL TWC speed tests have had 100 Mbps for awhile now. The Austin one certainly does, and it's nowhere near DOCSIS 3 territory (nearest FiOS is in Dallas). |
|
|
|
 patcat88 join:2002-04-05 Jamaica, NY kudos:1 | reply to jester121 said by jester121:said by iansltx:Combine that with the fact that you can't cap and tier by GB per month in a competitive (read: FiOS) market What if Verizon decides to institute caps? There is RCN in 1/6th of NYC. |
|
 RARPSL join:1999-12-08 Suffern, NY | reply to iansltx said by iansltx:Also, remember that Verizon is competing against Cablevision, who has already said they aren't going to cap. Also, unlike Comcast who "plans to have 65% of their markets covered by DOCSIS 3.0 by the end of this year -- and 100% of their markets DOCSIS 3.0 enabled by the end of 2010", CV is 100% DOCSIS 3.0 Enabled RIGHT NOW (Ultra 101/15 anytime/anywhere [in their coverage area] you want to order it). |
|
 iansltx join:2007-02-19 Golden, CO kudos:2 | Valid point, but CC serves a much greater (and more dispersed) geographical area than CV. |
|