site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


cameronsfx

join:2009-01-08
Panama City, FL

reply to openbox9

Re: Vermont should go after Verizon and contact the IRS

said by openbox9:

So VZ's liability is what? morbo See Profile insinuated that VZ is liable/guilty of something. My response was that VZ did nothing wrong and that there are others to clearly lay the responsibility/blame on to include Fairpoint's CEO and BOD as well as state/federal regulators.
Deal's done. VZ has NO liability. Period. It was approved. Period. Done. Over. Fairpoint stands on its own. Period.

----
Not a lawyer but play one on TV....and Oprah.

sonicmerlin

join:2009-05-24
Cleveland, OH
kudos:1

No it's not "done". "Legality" is a term corporations put out to shield themselves from the common man's wrath. However in the telecom industry "legal" is meaningless when the FCC spends a decade gutting the most important Act regarding national communication services ever passed.

Verizon had a responsibility to the consumers it had been serving for years, and who had been loyally subscribing to their services for years. They were as aware as anyone that their customers would be entering a minefield with Fairpoint. They need to be held accountable for their anti-societal business decisions.


Saturday, 02-Jun 18:31:09 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics