<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Re: Changing Polarization&#x27; in forum &#x27;Wireless Service Providers&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Changing-Polarization-22642895</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:06:32 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:06:32 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Changing Polarization</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Changing-Polarization-22644254</link>
<description><![CDATA[AMD Phreak posted : Same direction will not work, as Intralink has suggested.  Even with sync you will be mashing the front end of the receiver every time someone talks back to the cluster.  This will occur even with cross-polarization as the radio reciever sensitivity is very high in comparison to what the received signal will be.<br><br>Vertical spacing will be the only potential solution, and even then I have my doubts.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Changing-Polarization-22644254</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 10:34:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Changing Polarization</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Changing-Polarization-22644034</link>
<description><![CDATA[IntraLink posted : That's probably not going to work on the same channel.<br><br>You would need a lot of physical separation like maybe 100 feet to get anything out of the cross polarization on the AP side.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Changing-Polarization-22644034</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 09:57:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Changing Polarization</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Changing-Polarization-22643756</link>
<description><![CDATA[Mad Dawg posted : In theory you should have 20 db of separaton by using opposite polarity but as smokeshow said if your using the sync abilities on the motos it shouldnt matter]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Changing-Polarization-22643756</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 08:54:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Changing Polarization</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Changing-Polarization-22642934</link>
<description><![CDATA[Equis posted : Hello<br><br>I have 2 AP's very very close and was hoping that using opposite Polarization on one of them (Ap and all its sms) would stop the other AP's sm's screaming at the wrong AP<br><br>just wondering how much it would help<br><br>:-)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Changing-Polarization-22642934</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 00:21:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Changing Polarization</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Changing-Polarization-22642919</link>
<description><![CDATA[Smokeshow posted : 900 AP's or SM's? If they are SM's, then are they on the same AP? We need a bit more info on this one.<br><br>Generally, if you are using sync properly, you should be fine running on the same polarization]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Changing-Polarization-22642919</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 00:16:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Changing Polarization</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Changing-Polarization-22642895</link>
<description><![CDATA[Equis posted : Hello<br><br>I would like to run 2x 900 canopy units on the same frequency, same pole, same direction using sync.<br><br>If I change the Polarization of one yagi could I expect to have about a 10db loss/separation?<br><br>Thanks<br><br>:-)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Changing-Polarization-22642895</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 00:07:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

