<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Ugh in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r22647824</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 20:37:51 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 20:37:51 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Ugh</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22658303</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1528955"><b>EPS</b></A> : Actually, wireless carriers do often collaborate with carriers on phones.<br><br>For example, the BlackBerry Storm, and the Treo 500v were both developed by partnerships with Vodafone and RIM or Palm, respectively... These may not be the most innovative devices out there, though, while the more innovative devices do tend to be non-carrier sourced...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22658303</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 19:52:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Ugh</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22649040</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1048555"><b>BF69</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  sonicmerlin <A HREF="/useremail/u/1646149"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>&#147;In the absence of exclusivity agreements, wireless carriers would have less incentive to develop and promote innovative handsets, because other providers would have immediate access to the handsets without having made any investment in research and design," Verizon wrote in its comments to Congress on during a hearing on exclusivity.<br><br>Wow, I didn't know Verizon and other wireless carriers made phones.  Golly gee, now I see where....what's that?  They *don't* make phones?  Oh.<br><br>Well then, screw you Verizon.<br> </div>Innovative? How is gimping a phone and taking away functionality being "innovative"?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22649040</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 10:31:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Ugh</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22647824</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1646149"><b>sonicmerlin</b></A> : &#147;In the absence of exclusivity agreements, wireless carriers would have less incentive to develop and promote innovative handsets, because other providers would have immediate access to the handsets without having made any investment in research and design," Verizon wrote in its comments to Congress on during a hearing on exclusivity.<br><br>Wow, I didn't know Verizon and other wireless carriers made phones.  Golly gee, now I see where....what's that?  They *don't* make phones?  Oh.<br><br>Well then, screw you Verizon.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22647824</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 22:56:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
