<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Re: Wow&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Wow-22645049</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:51:01 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:51:01 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Wow</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Wow-22668763</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : Or the Jackson estate can just go out and buy more AT&T stock especially while it's still in the toilet: down approx 39% from a year ago...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Wow-22668763</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 17:11:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Wow</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Wow-22648417</link>
<description><![CDATA[sporkme posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1427659" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1427659');">jfmezei</a>:</small><br><br>And since they charge for each SMS, there is accounting and probably logging involved which requires the distributed nodes to send accounting information to some central accounting system.<br> </div>Which is probably the largest cost in providing SMS service. :)<br><small>--<br>with every mistake we must surely be learning</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Wow-22648417</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 03:08:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Wow</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Wow-22648000</link>
<description><![CDATA[jfmezei posted : If Michael Jackson's death resulted in AT&T profits rising, shouldn't the Jackson estate get AT&T to give them some royalties on the generated traffic ? :-) :-) :-)<br><br>the large north american mobile networks don't set prices according to costs, they set prices according to what the market will bear. If people are willing to pay $0.10 per SMS, then they wil charge $0.10 even if it costs them just a fraction of a penny to provide.<br><br>In fairness though, one needs to realise that SMS does require some hefty computing and storage. Remember that SMS is store and forward and some system will store your system until the destination handset is turned on, at which point it needs to route the message via appropriate systems to finally reach the antenna that serves that handset. And since they charge for each SMS, there is accounting and probably logging involved which requires the distributed nodes to send accounting information to some central accounting system.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Wow-22648000</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 23:44:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Wow</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Wow-22645049</link>
<description><![CDATA[ender7074 posted : Thats a lot of dough for something as simple as text messages.  I'll bet they still complain about it not costing enough though...<br><small>--<br>Does Microsoft mean small and squishy?</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Wow-22645049</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 13:08:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

