O Canada! > Canadian > Canadian Broadband > Status of 2008-108 Throttling Review and Vary

reply to jfmezei

Re: Status of 2008-108 Throttling Review and Vary

TY or posting that JF.

If anymore come your way, please do post.

Also, even if you are not happy with your reply (I haven't read it yet, but will now), I think you tried more than anyone else (associations aside) and had a very deep passion in what was pulled on everyone. You were, and are, a voice of a thousand people easy.

So no matter what, you did your very best to bring it all together and present it on behalf of everyone.

Be proud and be happy.

Thanks for all your effort. I for one appreciate what you have done and thank you.

Reading time now.

reply to jfmezei
CAIP's submission is good.

The only thing that I would have liked to see is at the end for the CRTC to:

- Issue an order mandating removal of DPI capabilities from the GAS links

Throttling is only one aspect of the evils of DPI - while currently it's the most obvious, removal of throttling does not protect our privacy, or protect us from other nasties down the road. jf touched on this in his submission.

jf - don't be too hard on yourself - CAIP's submission had a team of people working on it. Without being a paid lobbyist, there is only so much time you can spend. You did well for yourself!

reply to jfmezei
Just finished reading your submission JF.... good work. Between both submissions, I believe just about everything possible has been covered!

Yup. I liked Vaxinations/JF's submission.

Very easy to read. Very easy to understand. Very good points brought forth.

I don't see how the CRTC can ignore them (again).

Very well done.

It goes a bit deeper and IN YOUR FACE type thing which CAIP's doesn't do (CAIP's is more "reserved/refined").

I liked it.

Kudos to JF & CAIP.

JF, excellent disassembly of the Sympatico 'straw man'.

Also, in your paragraph 32, I would have added that this practice probably an offence under the Criminal Code .... but that's just me talking.