Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Tech and Talk » Technical » Digital Imaging Technology » Continuous vs Flash Lighting and Everything in Between Part2
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Posting:
Post a:
Post a:
Interactive Lighting Tutorial »
« Continuous vs Flash Lighting and Everything in Between Part 3  
AuthorAll Replies


Splitpair
Premium
join:2000-07-29
Cow Towne
·T-Mobile US

reply to Exit
Re: Continuous vs Flash Lighting and Everything in Between Part2

said by Exit See Profile :

There is no lighting rule that can't or shouldn't be broken, but I agree that it's important to learn the basics before you go blazing your own trails.
I would say you fail to understand there are certain rules that cannot be broken, for example the angle of incidence is not a variable as light will work in a predictable manner based on the angle it strikes a subject, understanding just how that works is one of the keys to mastering it.

Another rule that cannot be broken is the inverse square law, it is not variable and there is no miracle light amplifier, if ones light is 5.6 feet from the subject and it is moved to 8 feet you will only have half the light to work with, move it to 11 and the light will be reduced by another half.

Another basic rule that cannot be bent is direct lighting flattens features and as the light is moved off direct it begins to sculpt.

By understanding the rules which become the basics of lighting allows experimentation with predictable results, while failing to understand the rules leaves one wondering what went wrong…

Wayne
--
If you cannot fix it with a buttset and some beanies you ain't a technician


Exit
Premium,ExMod 2002
join:2001-04-10
Canada
·TekSavvy Solutions..

said by Splitpair See Profile :

said by Exit See Profile :

There is no lighting rule that can't or shouldn't be broken, but I agree that it's important to learn the basics before you go blazing your own trails.
I would say you fail to understand there are certain rules that cannot be broken, for example the angle of incidence is not a variable as light will work in a predictable manner based on the angle it strikes a subject, understanding just how that works is one of the keys to mastering it.

Another rule that cannot be broken is the inverse square law, it is not variable and there is no miracle light amplifier, if ones light is 5.6 feet from the subject and it is moved to 8 feet you will only have half the light to work with, move it to 11 and the light will be reduced by another half.

Another basic rule that cannot be bent is direct lighting flattens features and as the light is moved off direct it begins to sculpt.

By understanding the rules which become the basics of lighting allows experimentation with predictable results, while failing to understand the rules leaves one wondering what went wrong…

Wayne
Those weren't exactly the rules I was talking about, but you are correct. That is more the characteristics of light rather than how a person uses it to light things. Some rules can't be overcome, but sometimes people don't care either


Splitpair
Premium
join:2000-07-29
Cow Towne
·T-Mobile US

said by Exit See Profile :

Some rules can't be overcome, but sometimes people don't care either
For what it is worth a rule that can be bent or even tossed out the window depending on what one considers acceptable would be the ratios and is one angle of experimentation that even a beginner straddled with an on camera flash can use to improve a shot with something as simple as a reflector.

Wayne
--
If you cannot fix it with a buttset and some beanies you ain't a technician
-
Forums » Tech and Talk » Technical » Digital Imaging TechnologyInteractive Lighting Tutorial »
« Continuous vs Flash Lighting and Everything in Between Part 3  


Tuesday, 08-Dec 22:34:59 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [193] Sprint Sued For Distracted Driving Death
· [81] 3G Network Test Says AT&T Is Tops
· [72] Mediacom Unveils 105 Mbps Pricing
· [62] Sprint Poised For A Turnaround?
· [50] The Future Of Wi-Fi Is Bright
· [48] WPA Cracker: Test WPA-PSK Networks In 20 Minutes
· [47] Site Leaks Yahoo, Verizon Fed Data Share Pricing
· [44] Microwaving Your Innards Is Not 'Extreme'
· [39] Verizon LTE: 5-12 Mbps Downstream
· [18] Verizon Settles With NJ Over Misleading FiOS Marketing
Most people now reading
· Comcast refused to install 400' feet. [Comcast HSI]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Throttling of NNTP traffic ?? [Cogeco]
· ICC Strats??? [World of Warcraft]
· IMG 1.7 (IMG Updates and Discussion) [Verizon FIOS TV]
· CRTC Response to ME: You will be Band F FOREVER!!! [TekSavvy]
· Microsoft Security Bulletin(s) for December 8, 2009 [Security]
· [ Classes] ATTN Death Knights - Post your spec for critique! [World of Warcraft]
· Comcast Customers: Would You Prefer Metered Billing? [Comcast HSI]