site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

openbox9

join:2004-01-26
Alexandria, VA
kudos:2

reply to sonicmerlin

Re: Government Oversight

said by sonicmerlin:

Whether it's Time Warner's illicit and unwanted "reeducation" programs to turn its users against each other and help it pass its metered billing program, or Comcast's throttling of certain types of internet usage, or Fairpoint's desire to impose a 1993 level 5 GB cap on their DSL customers, 'big business' demonstrates over and over again how truly greedy these unregulated oligopolies are.
And amazingly without the iron first of the government, these "Evil Corporations" tempered their desires and bent to the will of the consumer. Crazy how things can work in a marketplace if enough consumers voice their wants and desires and are willing to back them up with their wallet if need be.
said by sonicmerlin:

I'd like to see a law passed in Canada that forces ISPs to reveal their internal data on the actual cost of internet bandwidth to them.
What possible purpose would that information fill besides inflaming individuals around sites like this. There are many other costs of serving customers than an ISP's bandwidth costs.


digitalfreak
Premium
join:2005-12-09
Blacklick, OH

1 edit

We all saw what happened in a world of loosely regulated banking. Greed rules.


sonicmerlin

join:2009-05-24
Cleveland, OH
kudos:1

reply to openbox9
Oh PLEASE. Time Warner only tempered their desires when Congress in the form of Rep. Eric Massa threatened to get involved. Besides, you can't expect the public to get up in arms about every little unethical decision or money grab that every monopolistic corporation makes. One of the jobs of the government and the FCC is to protect the people, who are too busy or concerned with their own lives to worry about every little management detail at the national level. This protection includes protecting from corporate greed and business interests, which are very often at odds with the public good.


openbox9

join:2004-01-26
Alexandria, VA
kudos:2

And Congress got involved why? Because constituents spoke up. The system worked. No, I don't expect the public to get up in arms about every little alleged unethical decision or money grab. Only a select minority is affected, cares about, or even understands some of the questionable business dealings. I'm perfectly fine with the US not becoming a Nanny state. If people aren't willing to attempt to care for their interests and well being, they shouldn't have an expectation that the government will either.


Sunday, 03-Jun 04:31:03 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics