 bbarreraPremium,MVM
join:2000-10-23
Sacramento, CA
kudos:1
 ·SureWest Internet
| reply to ba142
Re: USG200 speed tests #2 said by ba142:BMW Throughput on the autobahn?  |
|
 BranoI hate VogonsPremium,MVM
join:2002-06-25
Burlington, ON
kudos:2
 ·Bell Fibe
| I couldn't digest the results so I ran another test this time using ftp protocol. I was downloading exactly the same 330MB zipped iso as in my first 2.11 set of tests »USG200 speed tests
FTP server was vsftpd and I was downloading with wget redirecting output to /dev/null to get rid of possible disk write delays.
Here is an example from just the firewall test
brano@tweety:~> wget -O /dev/null ftp://192.168.50.2/iso.zip
--2009-07-04 00:04:30-- ftp://192.168.50.2/iso.zip
=> `/dev/null'
Connecting to 192.168.50.2:21... connected.
Logging in as anonymous ... Logged in!
==> SYST ... done. ==> PWD ... done.
==> TYPE I ... done. ==> CWD not needed.
==> SIZE iso.zip ... 344458362
==> PASV ... done. ==> RETR iso.zip ... done.
Length: 344458362 (329M)
100%[================================================================================== ==========>] 344,458,362 16.3M/s in 20s
2009-07-04 00:04:51 (16.0 MB/s) - `/dev/null' saved [344458362]
with following results
USG200 2.12 ftp test
Comments on results:
Tests on AppPatrol, AV, IDP, ADP should be valid as all these are scanning FTP protocol.
The AS test is invalid since AS looks at SMTP and POP3 only.
Interestingly the AV and IDP tests speeds were varying from 35KB/s to 8MB/s during the one file download. Now I'm convinced that AV and IDP have serious issues!
Overall the device seems to be not delivering to advertised specs with firmware 2.12(AQU.0) :(
--
openSUSE 11.1, KDE 4.2 |
|
| For IDP/AV performance, you can try to test it with multiple connections. The aggregate multiple session performance will be much better than single session performance.
BR,
style4me32 |
|
|
|
BranoI hate VogonsPremium,MVM
join:2002-06-25
Burlington, ON
kudos:2 | It probably would, but that's not the point of my test.
DUT should perform to advertised specs for single session.
--
openSUSE 11.1, KDE 4.2 |
|
| said by Brano:It probably would, but that's not the point of my test. DUT should perform to advertised specs for single session. Grey area 
--
"Perl is executable line noise, Python is executable pseudo-code."
|
|
BranoI hate VogonsPremium,MVM
join:2002-06-25
Burlington, ON
kudos:2 Reviews:
·Bell Fibe
| See my #1 speed test with 2.11 firmware »USG200 speed tests
The performance then was mostly up to specs (excluding AppPatrol).
Something seems to be wrong in 2.12.
--
openSUSE 11.1, KDE 4.2 |
|
| reply to Brano
Under the ftp test, does the USG200 has high CPU usage issue? What is the USG200 CPU usage when download the 330MB iso file? |
|
| I have a 30Mbps Internet connection (PPPoE) and using the ZyWALL USG200, when downloading using FTP the USG200 CPU usage is quite high 60%~80%.
When downloading a 1300MB ISO file using FlashGet and set to 8 simultaneous connections in microsoft.com, the USG200 CPU usage is >85%, does the USG200 has a PPPoE or CPU usage high issue?
Testing ISO File:
»www.microsoft.com/downloads/deta···3d06d6cb |
|
