site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
553
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

dlewis23

join:2005-04-18
Boca Raton, FL

Vote for Change?

I thought everyone who voted for him, voted for change.

Doesn't look like any change to me. Maybe next time people will actually check out the person before the vote for him.

Fisamo
Premium
join:2004-02-20
Apex, NC

Don't count on it...

The only checking out that needs to happen is the letter after their name.

BTW, that goes for the vast majority of people on BOTH sides.



badtrip
I heart the East Bay
Premium
join:2004-03-20
Albany, CA

reply to dlewis23

said by dlewis23:

I thought everyone who voted for him, voted for change.

Doesn't look like any change to me. Maybe next time people will actually check out the person before the vote for him.
Truth be told, many of us didn't vote FOR Obama, we voted AGAINST McCain/Palin.

mcd

join:2007-05-19

said by badtrip:

said by dlewis23:

I thought everyone who voted for him, voted for change.

Doesn't look like any change to me. Maybe next time people will actually check out the person before the vote for him.
Truth be told, many of us didn't vote FOR Obama, we voted AGAINST McCain/Palin.
Isn't that the truth.

sonicmerlin

join:2009-05-24
Cleveland, OH
kudos:1

reply to dlewis23
I'm just going to post one person's expert reply over and over again.

This is a move to monitor Government agencies, NOT the public the way the previous boss dictator did.

The government has no inherent right to privacy in most circumstances. This is a move towards Gov transparency, and monitoring possible corruption with "contractors".


mcd

join:2007-05-19

4 edits

said by sonicmerlin:

I'm just going to post one person's expert reply over and over again.

This is a move to monitor Government agencies, NOT the public the way the previous boss dictator did.

The government has no inherent right to privacy in most circumstances. This is a move towards Gov transparency, and monitoring possible corruption with "contractors".
lol, believe that transparency act if you want. Nothing has changed.

»www.msnbc.msn.com/id/31373407/ns···e_house/
»www.eff.org/press/mentions/2009/4/10-0
»www.eff.org/press/mentions/2009/2/16-1
»www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/04/ob···parency-
»www.newsweek.com/id/202875
»techpresident.com/blog-entry/oba···ls-short

There's more, but you should get the gist of it.

Finger2208

join:2001-04-07
Lindale, TX

reply to mcd

said by mcd:

said by badtrip:

said by dlewis23:

I thought everyone who voted for him, voted for change.

Doesn't look like any change to me. Maybe next time people will actually check out the person before the vote for him.
Truth be told, many of us didn't vote FOR Obama, we voted AGAINST McCain/Palin.
Isn't that the truth.
And hindsight being 20-20 you made an extremely poor choice

vinnie97
Premium
join:2003-12-05
US
kudos:1

3 edits

reply to sonicmerlin
You have seriously been brainwashed if you believe what you're spouting about so-called transparency.

»www.youtube.com/watch?v=yyjk58yT···embedded

satellite68

join:2007-04-11
Louisville, KY

reply to dlewis23
Today is July 5, 2009. It has been less than six months since Obama was put into office.

I suppose for the armchair jockeys who incessantly complain about everything Obama, less than six months for "change" might be long enough. I, and a lot of others, am willing to be patient. After all, it took eight years to get us in the mess we're in, and I'm sure it will take more than six months to "clean up after the elephants".


vinnie97
Premium
join:2003-12-05
US
kudos:1

It took a lot longer than 8 years, but keep believing that partisan nonsense, it will be our socialistic undoing. *kisses the country goodbye*


Sunday, 03-Jun 04:32:59 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics