 slipstream1 Premium join:2005-11-15 Jacksonville, TX
| reply to Killa200 Re: RouterOS Questions
Instead of bridging the backhaul, why not route it. Say you have 192.168.10.0/24 as the IP address range for Mikrotik #2 and you have 192.168.11.0/24 as a subnet of addresses for your backhauls. You would need to do the following: WLAN 5.8 BH on MTIK#1: 192.168.11.1/30 AP BRIDGE WLAN 5.8 BH on MTIK#2: 192.168.11.2/30 STATION Routes on MTIK#1 would be 0.0.0.0/0 Gateway:Address of Cisco Then you will have 3 default routes: 1. ether1 connected to cisco 2. WLAN 2.4 AP 3. WLAN 5.8 BH The following would need to be entered as a static route: DST-192.168.10.0/24 Gateway: 192.168.11.2 The gateway on your MTIK#2 would be 192.168.11.1.
This way you are totally routed across the backhaul and the backhauls are isolated from the 2.4 ap's.
On masquerade rules, I have always done: chain=srcnat action=masquerade out-interface=wlan 5.8 BH.
Hope this gives you some other ideas on how to go. |