slipstream1
Premium
join:2005-11-15
Jacksonville, TX
| reply to Killa200
Re: RouterOS Questions
Instead of bridging the backhaul, why not route it. Say you have 192.168.10.0/24 as the IP address range for Mikrotik #2 and you have 192.168.11.0/24 as a subnet of addresses for your backhauls. You would need to do the following:
WLAN 5.8 BH on MTIK#1: 192.168.11.1/30 AP BRIDGE
WLAN 5.8 BH on MTIK#2: 192.168.11.2/30 STATION
Routes on MTIK#1 would be 0.0.0.0/0 Gateway:Address of Cisco
Then you will have 3 default routes:
1. ether1 connected to cisco
2. WLAN 2.4 AP
3. WLAN 5.8 BH
The following would need to be entered as a static route:
DST-192.168.10.0/24 Gateway: 192.168.11.2
The gateway on your MTIK#2 would be 192.168.11.1.
This way you are totally routed across the backhaul and the backhauls are isolated from the 2.4 ap's.
On masquerade rules, I have always done:
chain=srcnat action=masquerade out-interface=wlan 5.8 BH.
Hope this gives you some other ideas on how to go. |
