republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » US Telco Support » AT&T » AT&T U-verse » why does HD on ATT UVerse seem so much better
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Posting:
Post a:
Post a:
When should I expect my first AT&T U Verse Statment »
« Getting screwed again....  
AuthorAll Replies


djrobx

join:2000-05-31
Valencia, CA
·PHONE POWER
·AT&T U-Verse
·AT&T CallVantage
·Time Warner VOIP
·RoadRunner Cable

reply to STLCompGuy
Re: why does HD on ATT UVerse seem so much better

U-verse HD isn't the greatest, but it's still a LOT better than what we get from Time Warner Cable in our area.

Time Warner in this area is trying to compete with AT&T, DirecTV and DISH, but are trying to cram too many MPEG-2 HD channels without making enough space for them. Whenever there's a lot of activity on the screen or there are rapid scene changes, the picture pixelates and the colors wash out. Maybe your cable company is making the same mistake.

Both suffer from over-compression. In AT&T's case, they have to use a low bitrate on MPEG-4 to fit two HD streams into the relatively small data pipe going to homes. It looks good most of the time, with some strange motion artifacts (rolling fog doesn't move smoothly, backgrounds like grass on a football field shifts). Still, MPEG-4 seems to maintain a pleasant picture without completely losing its composure. It seems AT&T plans on addressing this by increasing the bandwidth per home.
--
AT&T U-Hearse
Your funeral. Delivered.


heat84

join:2004-03-11
Fort Lauderdale, FL
·Comcast
·AT&T Southeast

said by djrobx See Profile :

It seems AT&T plans on addressing this by increasing the bandwidth per home.
Which isn't possible unless they either take bandwidth away from the internet side or go FTTP.

MyDogHsFleas
Premium
join:2007-08-15
Austin, TX
·AT&T U-Verse
·AT&T Southwest

said by heat84 See Profile :

said by djrobx See Profile :

It seems AT&T plans on addressing this by increasing the bandwidth per home.
Which isn't possible unless they either take bandwidth away from the internet side or go FTTP.
AT&T actually has other moves they can make before going FTTH. They can upgrade to VDSL2 (which is apparently in trial now -- people have posted they are seeing 32 up/5 down in a new profile), and they can implement pair bonding (to increase the possible distance from the VRAD.

VDSL2 can get them about a 50% increase over the same copper.


uversehmm

@sbcglobal.net

reply to djrobx
I totally disagree that Uverse HD is better than cable HD. They had just installed Uverse service in my house and I tell you that Comcast cable's HD picture quality is better than Uverse. At least, from what I have experienced so far. The HD picture looks pixalated; in fact, it is very noticeable on the Network's Logo. I am dissapointed because I expected an opposite outcome reading all the good reviews about Uverse. I have 2 HD boxes in my house plus Uverse internet 6.0 installed. By the way, I have a nice Samsung 52 inch TV, therefore, I will capture all defects.

The quality of HD in Comcast was crisp and clear.

texasguy37

join:2009-05-18
Grand Prairie, TX
Well, I can only state what is happening in my house. I switched from Dish Network to U-verse. The U-verse HD quality is good and compares favorably to the quality I received with Dish.


djrobx

join:2000-05-31
Valencia, CA
·PHONE POWER
·AT&T U-Verse
·AT&T CallVantage
·Time Warner VOIP
·RoadRunner Cable


1 edit
reply to uversehmm
said by uversehmm :

I totally disagree that Uverse HD is better than cable HD.
I'm sure that's true in your area. When we had Comcast, the picture was far superior to U-verse and locals were bit-for-bit equivalent to OTA, but they didn't offer that many channels. When Time Warner took over, they started further compressing the channels to fit more in, and the result was absolutely disastrous to quality. U-verse is easily better than the crap we get from Time Warner now. Don't assume just because your cable is good that everyone else's is, it varies a lot by area!

Which isn't possible unless they either take bandwidth away from the internet side or go FTTP.
Not true. AT&T is running VDSL at 25/2 (or 19/2 for far customers) now. They're testing a 32/5 profile with 3HD and higher quality streams. Pair bonding/VDSL2 has been on AT&T's radar for a long time which is supposed to extend the reach for customers further out.

--
AT&T U-Hearse
Your funeral. Delivered.
-
Forums » US Telco Support » AT&T » AT&T U-verseWhen should I expect my first AT&T U Verse Statment »
« Getting screwed again....  


Wednesday, 09-Dec 21:34:43 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [199] Sprint Sued For Distracted Driving Death
· [107] AT&T Launching New 24 Mbps U-Verse Tier
· [82] 3G Network Test Says AT&T Is Tops
· [72] Mediacom Unveils 105 Mbps Pricing
· [66] Sprint Poised For A Turnaround?
· [63] WPA Cracker: Test WPA-PSK Networks In 20 Minutes
· [56] AT&T Hints At Usage-Based iPhone Data Pricing
· [51] The Future Of Wi-Fi Is Bright
· [47] Site Leaks Yahoo, Verizon Fed Data Share Pricing
· [44] Microwaving Your Innards Is Not 'Extreme'
Most people now reading
· ICC strats [World of Warcraft]
· Is sleeping similar to being dead? [General Questions]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Comcast refused to install 400' feet. [Comcast HSI]
· ICC Strats??? [World of Warcraft]
· Is My ISP Blocking Access To Websites [Security]
· Adobe Flash Player version 10.0.42.34 [Security]
· Hot Girl falls face first down stairs [56k Lookout (Broadband Heavy)]
· RG Firmware update to VDSL2 this morning [AT&T U-verse]